Message from discussion
libtcmalloc on Windows x64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.8.4 with SMTP id 4mr41761anh.20.1246195125960; Sun, 28 Jun
2009 06:18:45 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 06:18:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m3r5x4lxx8.fsf@meta.mtv.corp.google.com>
X-IP: 64.235.97.218
References: <14b85b55-80f4-48a3-8ffe-d07659712c47@f19g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>
<m3r5x4lxx8.fsf@meta.mtv.corp.google.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.11)
Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <593d7830-dd7b-419f-bc94-db5bbde3d7df@c9g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: libtcmalloc on Windows x64
From: Alex Black <a...@alexblack.ca>
To: google-perftools <google-perftools@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks for the response Craig. I don't see myself writing 64bit asm
any time soon, but you never know :)
On Jun 28, 1:39=A0am, Craig Silverstein <csilv...@google.com> wrote:
> Sorry, windows x64 isn't supported yet.
>
> I don't know what it would take to get it supported. =A0Maybe not much.
> But I don't really know windows, and don't have a 64-bit machine to
> play around with. =A0We do have 64-bit asm instructions for linux, but I
> don't know how easy it is to port them to windows-land (if indeed
> that's needed).
>
> If you do figure out how to get this to work, we're happy to take
> patches! :-)
>
|
