<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>google-perftools Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools</link>
  <description>Developer discussion around the Google perftools.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Issue 187 in google-perftools: Compilation errors while compiling a C++ file that includes google/heap-checker.h</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/33f13fe5a8336359/bde5905f0ff81f0c?show_docid=bde5905f0ff81f0c</link>
  <description>
  Comment #2 on issue 187 by mohit.aron: Compilation errors while compiling a &lt;br&gt; C++ file that includes google/heap-checker.h &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools/issues/detail?id=187&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; I did something slightly different. I changed the &#39;#include &amp;quot;config.h&amp;quot;&#39; in &lt;br&gt; heap- &lt;br&gt; checker.h to &#39;#include &amp;lt;google/config.h&#39; and copied the config.h that was
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/33f13fe5a8336359/bde5905f0ff81f0c?show_docid=bde5905f0ff81f0c</guid>
  <author>
  codesite-nore...@google.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 05:55:41 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Issue 184 in google-perftools: pprof --raw output has slight bug with remote fetch</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/b303acef59d5d58f/5bfa4c003c90146b?show_docid=5bfa4c003c90146b</link>
  <description>
  Comment #4 on issue 184 by csilvers: pprof --raw output has slight bug with &lt;br&gt; remote fetch &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools/issues/detail?id=184&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; I think your patch is missing the part where we actually use WGET_OPTIONS &lt;br&gt; when &lt;br&gt; running wget commands. I added that into pprof, and will make that part of
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/b303acef59d5d58f/5bfa4c003c90146b?show_docid=5bfa4c003c90146b</guid>
  <author>
  codesite-nore...@google.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 05:50:40 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Issue 187 in google-perftools: Compilation errors while compiling a C++ file that includes google/heap-checker.h</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/33f13fe5a8336359/a3cd0192977c64aa?show_docid=a3cd0192977c64aa</link>
  <description>
  Updates: &lt;br&gt; Status: Started &lt;br&gt; Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium &lt;br&gt; Comment #1 on issue 187 by csilvers: Compilation errors while compiling a &lt;br&gt; C++ file that includes google/heap-checker.h &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools/issues/detail?id=187&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Doh! So it is. I&#39;ve removed config.h for the next release. I guess not
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/33f13fe5a8336359/a3cd0192977c64aa?show_docid=a3cd0192977c64aa</guid>
  <author>
  codesite-nore...@google.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 05:41:38 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Issue 187 in google-perftools: Compilation errors while compiling a C++ file that includes google/heap-checker.h</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/33f13fe5a8336359/58609c0e5996ca4f?show_docid=58609c0e5996ca4f</link>
  <description>
  Status: New &lt;br&gt; Owner: ---- &lt;br&gt; New issue 187 by mohit.aron: Compilation errors while compiling a C++ file &lt;br&gt; that includes google/heap-checker.h &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools/issues/detail?id=187&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; What steps will reproduce the problem? &lt;br&gt; 1. Write C++ code that #includes &amp;lt;google/heap-checker.h&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; 2. The compiler would produce errors about a missing config.h
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/33f13fe5a8336359/58609c0e5996ca4f?show_docid=58609c0e5996ca4f</guid>
  <author>
  codesite-nore...@google.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:23:40 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Issue 184 in google-perftools: pprof --raw output has slight bug with remote fetch</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/b303acef59d5d58f/cc131f6d4a8ececc?show_docid=cc131f6d4a8ececc</link>
  <description>
  Comment #3 on issue 184 by mrabkin: pprof --raw output has slight bug with &lt;br&gt; remote fetch &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools/issues/detail?id=184&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; WGET option patch attached. Unfortunately, WGET returns zero (success) &lt;br&gt; codes for bad &lt;br&gt; options, so I grep for an error message. &lt;br&gt; Attachments: &lt;br&gt; pprof_wget_options.patch 849 bytes
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/b303acef59d5d58f/cc131f6d4a8ececc?show_docid=cc131f6d4a8ececc</guid>
  <author>
  codesite-nore...@google.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:31:41 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Issue 185 in google-perftools: add realtime profiling support to cpuprofiler</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/268fc355770be0ab/b77c0ad4f0317b41?show_docid=b77c0ad4f0317b41</link>
  <description>
  Comment #6 on issue 185 by themastermind1: add realtime profiling support &lt;br&gt; to cpuprofiler &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools/issues/detail?id=185&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Cool, was just curious. Thanks!
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/268fc355770be0ab/b77c0ad4f0317b41?show_docid=b77c0ad4f0317b41</guid>
  <author>
  codesite-nore...@google.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:50:55 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Issue 185 in google-perftools: add realtime profiling support to cpuprofiler</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/268fc355770be0ab/48d0fe90d40a0d8a?show_docid=48d0fe90d40a0d8a</link>
  <description>
  Comment #5 on issue 185 by csilvers: add realtime profiling support to &lt;br&gt; cpuprofiler &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools/issues/detail?id=185&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; It&#39;s functionally the same: &lt;br&gt; --- &lt;br&gt; ==== //depot/google3/base/profile-h andler.cc#2 - &lt;br&gt; /home/csilvers/google3/base/pr o &lt;br&gt; file-handler.cc ==== &lt;br&gt; --- /tmp/g4-500/cache/depot/google 3/base/profile-handler.cc#2 2009-11-04
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/268fc355770be0ab/48d0fe90d40a0d8a?show_docid=48d0fe90d40a0d8a</guid>
  <author>
  codesite-nore...@google.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:41:49 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Issue 185 in google-perftools: add realtime profiling support to cpuprofiler</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/268fc355770be0ab/e9c5b79ebd58d51b?show_docid=e9c5b79ebd58d51b</link>
  <description>
  Comment #4 on issue 185 by themastermind1: add realtime profiling support &lt;br&gt; to cpuprofiler &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools/issues/detail?id=185&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m curious to see your version of the patch.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/268fc355770be0ab/e9c5b79ebd58d51b?show_docid=e9c5b79ebd58d51b</guid>
  <author>
  codesite-nore...@google.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:27:34 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Issue 186 in google-perftools: Can&#39;t compile on debian lenny i386</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/5ffff5044b89d4d6/8e18d44d958df677?show_docid=8e18d44d958df677</link>
  <description>
  Updates: &lt;br&gt; Status: Started &lt;br&gt; Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium &lt;br&gt; Comment #1 on issue 186 by csilvers: Can&#39;t compile on debian lenny i386 &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools/issues/detail?id=186&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; This is taken from svn head, I take it? You&#39;re right there&#39;s a missing &lt;br&gt; header. I&#39;ll &lt;br&gt; get that fixed up.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/5ffff5044b89d4d6/8e18d44d958df677?show_docid=8e18d44d958df677</guid>
  <author>
  codesite-nore...@google.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:23:30 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Issue 185 in google-perftools: add realtime profiling support to cpuprofiler</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/268fc355770be0ab/4ff156a0df68da0c?show_docid=4ff156a0df68da0c</link>
  <description>
  Updates: &lt;br&gt; Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium &lt;br&gt; Comment #3 on issue 185 by csilvers: add realtime profiling support to &lt;br&gt; cpuprofiler &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools/issues/detail?id=185&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; (No comment was entered for this change.)
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/268fc355770be0ab/4ff156a0df68da0c?show_docid=4ff156a0df68da0c</guid>
  <author>
  codesite-nore...@google.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:19:26 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Issue 185 in google-perftools: add realtime profiling support to cpuprofiler</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/268fc355770be0ab/0980e6881ded775b?show_docid=0980e6881ded775b</link>
  <description>
  Updates: &lt;br&gt; Status: Started &lt;br&gt; Comment #2 on issue 185 by csilvers: add realtime profiling support to &lt;br&gt; cpuprofiler &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools/issues/detail?id=185&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; I&#39;ve applied the patch (or more exactly, the functionality from the patch), &lt;br&gt; but one &lt;br&gt; of the unittests we use to test the heap-profiler handler breaks with the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/268fc355770be0ab/0980e6881ded775b?show_docid=0980e6881ded775b</guid>
  <author>
  codesite-nore...@google.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:15:23 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Issue 184 in google-perftools: pprof --raw output has slight bug with remote fetch</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/b303acef59d5d58f/a41a5eea06bb58da?show_docid=a41a5eea06bb58da</link>
  <description>
  Updates: &lt;br&gt; Status: Started &lt;br&gt; Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium &lt;br&gt; Comment #2 on issue 184 by csilvers: pprof --raw output has slight bug with &lt;br&gt; remote fetch &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools/issues/detail?id=184&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; I&#39;ve patched in the fix for problem 1, but haven&#39;t done anything with &lt;br&gt; problem 2 yet.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/b303acef59d5d58f/a41a5eea06bb58da?show_docid=a41a5eea06bb58da</guid>
  <author>
  codesite-nore...@google.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:11:16 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Issue 186 in google-perftools: Can&#39;t compile on debian lenny i386</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/5ffff5044b89d4d6/b05193336ce3f036?show_docid=b05193336ce3f036</link>
  <description>
  Status: New &lt;br&gt; Owner: ---- &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;New issue 186 by fredericsmailbox: Can&#39;t compile on debian lenny i386 &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools/issues/detail?id=186&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Source code just updated and can&#39;t compile it on Debian Lenny i386 &lt;br&gt; (./configure --enable-minimal and without): &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;In file included from src/symbolize.cc:37:
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/5ffff5044b89d4d6/b05193336ce3f036?show_docid=b05193336ce3f036</guid>
  <author>
  codesite-nore...@google.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:05:23 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Issue 182 in google-perftools: pprof results are low compared with top</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/f85ec054caf07c58/190707f37b7ed49b?show_docid=190707f37b7ed49b</link>
  <description>
  That&#39;s disappointing to hear. I&#39;d like to figure out what&#39;s going on. &lt;br&gt; These are not maps you made, I presume? They&#39;re probably from &lt;br&gt; tcmalloc. &lt;br&gt; I would expect GetStats() to show this memory. GetStats() has weird &lt;br&gt; behavior that the bigger the buffer you pass in, the more info it &lt;br&gt; gives you. Maybe pass in a really big buffer (like 1M) and see if it
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/f85ec054caf07c58/190707f37b7ed49b?show_docid=190707f37b7ed49b</guid>
  <author>
  csilv...@google.com
  (Craig Silverstein)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:34:41 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Issue 105 in google-perftools: Profiling does not happen across fork() calls</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/6044db9315aa70a2/b91d329d21daa2f1?show_docid=b91d329d21daa2f1</link>
  <description>
  Comment #6 on issue 105 by benjamin.becker: Profiling does not happen &lt;br&gt; across fork() calls &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools/issues/detail?id=105&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; I would just like to confirm that this issue is still present in v1.4, &lt;br&gt; tested on Linux 2.6.24 with the same results as &lt;br&gt; the submitter.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/google-perftools/browse_thread/thread/6044db9315aa70a2/b91d329d21daa2f1?show_docid=b91d329d21daa2f1</guid>
  <author>
  codesite-nore...@google.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:21:59 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
