Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
patch to LabeledMarker - improved visibility control
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 1 - 25 of 34 - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)   Newer >
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Sergey Ushakov  
View profile  
 More options Nov 12 2008, 5:31 pm
From: Sergey Ushakov <s-n-usha...@nm.ru>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:31:31 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Nov 12 2008 5:31 pm
Subject: patch to LabeledMarker - improved visibility control
Hi,

and first special thanks to Mike Purvis, as I have learned a lot while
examining his LabeledMarker...

Meanwhile during my first experience of using it in my project I ran
into several visibility issues. The patch to fix them is appended
below.

1) The current release version (1.2) of LabeledMarker does not allow
setting up visibility before .addOverlay()/.initialize(). It produces
an error due to .div_ not having been created yet. Normal overlays
(polylines, etc) do allow this. Solution: move .div_ creation code
from .initialize() to the constructor.

2) Labels are forced to be visible at  .addOverlay()/.initialize()
even if they were made hidden before. Solution: add helper
method .applyLabelVisibility_() and call it consistently from .show
(), .hide(), .setLabelVisibility().

3) LabeledMarker inherits from the GMarker the problem that it is
always visible after having been added to a map, regardless of the
visibility status assigned before (unlike other standard overlays).
Solution: add extra private property .ownVisibility_ to store assigned
visibility status and use it along with .applyLabelVisibility_() where
appropriate - in .initialize(), .show(), .hide().

Any comments will be most appreciated.

Regards,
Sergey

-------------------

--- labeledmarker-1.2.js        2008-11-13 00:47:31.000000000 +0300
+++ labeledmarker-new.js        2008-11-13 00:53:07.000000000 +0300
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@

 /**
  * Constructor for LabeledMarker, which picks up on strings from the
GMarker
- * options array, and then calls the GMarker constructor.
+ * options array, creates the div, and then calls the GMarker
constructor.
  *
  * @param {GLatLng} latlng
  * @param {GMarkerOptions} Named optional arguments:
@@ -45,7 +45,18 @@
   this.clickable_ = opt_opts.clickable || true;
   this.title_ = opt_opts.title || "";
   this.labelVisibility_  = true;
+  // That's a workaround for the problem with GMarker that it unlike
other
+  // GOverlay's is always visible after addOverlay(), regardless if
having
+  // been hidden before it
+  this.ownVisibility_ = true;

+  this.div_ = document.createElement("div");
+  this.div_.className = this.labelClass_;
+  this.div_.innerHTML = this.labelText_;
+  this.div_.style.position = "absolute";
+  this.div_.style.cursor = "pointer";
+  this.div_.title = this.title_;
+
   if (opt_opts.draggable) {
        // This version of LabeledMarker doesn't support dragging.
        opt_opts.draggable = false;
@@ -61,8 +72,8 @@
 LabeledMarker.prototype = new GMarker(new GLatLng(0, 0));

 /**
- * Is called by GMap2's addOverlay method. Creates the text div and
adds it
- * to the relevant parent div.
+ * Is called by GMap2's addOverlay method. Adds the text div to the
relevant
+ * parent div.
  *
  * @param {GMap2} map the map that has had this labeledmarker added
to it.
  */
@@ -71,13 +82,12 @@
   GMarker.prototype.initialize.apply(this, arguments);

   this.map_ = map;
-  this.div_ = document.createElement("div");
-  this.div_.className = this.labelClass_;
-  this.div_.innerHTML = this.labelText_;
-  this.div_.style.position = "absolute";
-  this.div_.style.cursor = "pointer";
-  this.div_.title = this.title_;

+  if (!this.ownVisibility_)
+    {
+      this.hide();
+    }
+  this.applyLabelVisibility_();
   map.getPane(G_MAP_MARKER_PANE).appendChild(this.div_);

   if (this.clickable_) {
@@ -162,11 +172,8 @@
  */
 LabeledMarker.prototype.show = function() {
   GMarker.prototype.show.apply(this, arguments);
-  if (this.labelVisibility_) {
-    this.showLabel();
-  } else {
-    this.hideLabel();
-  }
+  this.ownVisibility_ = true;
+  this.applyLabelVisibility_();
 };

@@ -176,7 +183,8 @@
  */
 LabeledMarker.prototype.hide = function() {
   GMarker.prototype.hide.apply(this, arguments);
-  this.hideLabel();
+  this.ownVisibility_ = false;
+  this.applyLabelVisibility_();
 };

@@ -195,13 +203,7 @@
  */
 LabeledMarker.prototype.setLabelVisibility = function(visibility) {
   this.labelVisibility_ = visibility;
-  if (!this.isHidden()) { // Marker showing, make visible change
-    if (this.labelVisibility_) {
-      this.showLabel();
-    } else {
-      this.hideLabel();
-    }
-  }
+  this.applyLabelVisibility_();
 };

@@ -215,6 +217,18 @@

 /**
+ * Updates actual label visibility depending on marker and label
settings.
+ */
+LabeledMarker.prototype.applyLabelVisibility_ = function () {
+  if ((!this.isHidden()) && this.labelVisibility_) {
+    this.showLabel();
+  } else {
+    this.hideLabel();
+  }
+};
+
+
+/**
  * Hides the label of the marker.
  */
 LabeledMarker.prototype.hideLabel = function() {


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
pamela fox  
View profile  
 More options Nov 12 2008, 5:54 pm
From: "pamela fox" <pamela....@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:54:29 +1100
Local: Wed, Nov 12 2008 5:54 pm
Subject: Re: patch to LabeledMarker - improved visibility control

Hey Sergey-
It looks good. I was the one that wrote all the show/hide stuff for
LabeledMarker, and I remember that I wasn't quite sure what developers would
expect the behavior to be. I assume that my current example of show/hide
still works correctly with this change in code?
Would you like to join the project and patch in the code, or have someone
else patch it in for you?

Thanks!


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Sergey Ushakov  
View profile  
 More options Nov 13 2008, 1:05 am
From: Sergey Ushakov <s-n-usha...@nm.ru>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:05:18 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 13 2008 1:05 am
Subject: Re: patch to LabeledMarker - improved visibility control
Hi Pamela,

thanks for the invitation. I have no objections against joining the
project.

I have also checked the new code against all samples including the one
with bars and restaurants. Looks like nothing is ruined :)

Regards,
Sergey

On 13 нояб, 01:54, "pamela fox" <pamela....@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
pamela fox  
View profile  
 More options Nov 13 2008, 1:12 am
From: "pamela fox" <pamela....@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:12:25 +1100
Local: Thurs, Nov 13 2008 1:12 am
Subject: Re: patch to LabeledMarker - improved visibility control

Okay, great. Follow the instructions under "How do I contribute?"
http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-utility-library-dev/wiki/FrequentlyAsk...

2008/11/13 Sergey Ushakov <s-n-usha...@nm.ru>


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Sergey Ushakov  
View profile  
 More options Nov 13 2008, 4:17 am
From: Sergey Ushakov <s-n-usha...@nm.ru>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:17:25 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 13 2008 4:17 am
Subject: Re: patch to LabeledMarker - improved visibility control
Ok,  I've signed the CLA electronically. Is some approval of yours to
come next?

Regards,
Sergey

On 13 нояб, 09:12, "pamela fox" <pamela....@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
pamela fox  
View profile  
 More options Nov 13 2008, 4:41 pm
From: "pamela fox" <pamela....@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:41:02 +1100
Local: Thurs, Nov 13 2008 4:41 pm
Subject: Re: patch to LabeledMarker - improved visibility control

Thanks Sergey. I checked out your signature and it seems you didn't actually
type the 'I AGREE". Can you do that, and then let me know what gmail address
I should add to the project for you?

2008/11/13 Sergey Ushakov <s-n-usha...@nm.ru>


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Sergey Ushakov  
View profile  
 More options Nov 13 2008, 9:54 pm
From: Sergey Ushakov <s-n-usha...@nm.ru>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:54:36 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 13 2008 9:54 pm
Subject: Re: patch to LabeledMarker - improved visibility control
Ok, done. And the gmail address is supplied in the CLA form too. But
frankly the CLA form did not have any objections the previous time
also ;)

Regards,
Sergey

On Nov 14, 12:41 am, "pamela fox" <pamela....@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
pamela fox  
View profile  
 More options Nov 13 2008, 10:18 pm
From: "pamela fox" <pamela....@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:18:50 +1100
Local: Thurs, Nov 13 2008 10:18 pm
Subject: Re: patch to LabeledMarker - improved visibility control

Hey Sergey-
Thanks, I've added you. The CLA form is just a Google Spreadsheet form, it's
not that smart. :)
You can go ahead and submit the patch now. If you can, try to re-run jslint
and packer to generate the new packed file as well.

- pamela


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Sergey Ushakov  
View profile  
 More options Nov 15 2008, 5:20 am
From: Sergey Ushakov <s-n-usha...@nm.ru>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 02:20:39 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 15 2008 5:20 am
Subject: Re: patch to LabeledMarker - improved visibility control
Hi Pamela,

I've encountered two issues with jslint and packer:

1) jslint has found a problem in the old part of the code:
Problem at line 111 character 5: Function statements cannot be placed
in blocks. Use a function expression or move the statement to the top
of the outer function.
function newEventPassthru(obj, event) {
...
This piece of code originates to the very first version by Mike, and
related comments suggest that he has put some effort into appropriate
considerations. Frankly I do not feel that I understand all aspects of
these matters, so maybe you have a look yourself or communicate Mike
so that he could share his ideas about best approach to make jslint
happy?

2) the packer page http://code.google.com/p/packer/source/checkout
suggests using the following url to check out the packer:
http://packer.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ , meanwhile all the folders
under http://packer.googlecode.com/svn/ are empty... And I could not
find any online packer tool (besides other non-google packers)... Is
there any other applicable approach to packing?

Regards,
Sergey

On Nov 14, 6:18 am, "pamela fox" <pamela....@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Nianwei  
View profile  
 More options Nov 16 2008, 6:49 am
From: Nianwei <nian...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 03:49:36 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Nov 16 2008 6:49 am
Subject: Re: patch to LabeledMarker - improved visibility control
Sergey:
 1) The jslint included in the util does not complaint about that
statement. You may used a different jslint that is more restrictive.
That said, if you want get rid of it, you can 1) move it up right
after the line ".initialize = function", or 2) rewrite it as

var newEventPassthru = function (obj, event) {
..}

As the best way to handle this: do not use this function, instead, use
the function in core library:

// delete the whole section of the function newEventPassthru
// then
//replace
    //  GEvent.addDomListener(this.div_, name, newEventPassthru(this,
name));
 // with
      GEvent.addDomListener(this.div_, name, GEvent.callback(GEvent,
GEvent.trigger, this, name));

not sure if GEvent.callback was available when the LabelMarker was
written, but there is no need for newEventPassthru function any more.

2) I think you should stick with the packer copy in the util folder
and just run ant with it, not try to check out the packer from other
source, unless you are totally familiar with the packer itself. As far
as I can see, if jslint is happy, then the packer is happy.

On Nov 15, 5:20 am, Sergey Ushakov <s-n-usha...@nm.ru> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Sergey Ushakov  
View profile  
 More options Nov 23 2008, 10:31 am
From: Sergey Ushakov <s-n-usha...@nm.ru>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:31:54 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Nov 23 2008 10:31 am
Subject: Re: patch to LabeledMarker - improved visibility control
Hi Nianwei and Pamela,

first thanks to Nianwei for the clues on getting hold of the tools and
for making jslint more happy :)  I've finally got jslint and packer
running, and jslint now does not have any complaints, and the examples
do not look broken by the new version :)

Pamela, I have checked in the new version into the trunk svn
repository. What's going to happen next? :)

Regards,
Sergey

On Nov 16, 2:49 pm, Nianwei <nian...@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
pamela fox  
View profile  
 More options Nov 23 2008, 6:01 pm
From: "pamela fox" <pamela....@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:01:09 +1100
Local: Sun, Nov 23 2008 6:01 pm
Subject: Re: patch to LabeledMarker - improved visibility control

Hey Sergey-

Thanks! Now we just need to decide if the changes are significant enough to
warrant a new version release of the library.
I'm just looking through the reported issues now. Would you have interest in
patching in the diff from either of these issues?
http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-utility-library-dev/issues/detail?id=73
http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-utility-library-dev/issues/detail?id=19

- pamela


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Sergey Ushakov  
View profile  
 More options Nov 25 2008, 3:36 am
From: Sergey Ushakov <s-n-usha...@nm.ru>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:36:13 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 25 2008 3:36 am
Subject: Re: patch to LabeledMarker - improved visibility control
Ok Pamela,

i'll try to have a look later this week, maybe on the weekend.

Regards,
Sergey

On Nov 24, 2:01 am, "pamela fox" <pamela....@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Sergey Ushakov  
View profile  
 More options Nov 30 2008, 12:17 pm
From: Sergey Ushakov <s-n-usha...@nm.ru>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:17:04 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Nov 30 2008 12:17 pm
Subject: Re: patch to LabeledMarker - improved visibility control
Hi Pamela,

I've incorporated the suggestions mentioned by
http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-utility-library-dev/issues/detail?id=19
and http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-utility-library-dev/issues/detail?id=35
without any hesitations and seemingly without damage :)  The new
version is submitted to the svn repository along with the new API
reference and a new example for setLabelText().

As for the suggestion of http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-utility-library-dev/issues/detail?id=73
, I've shared my concerns on the issue discussion page and would
rather suggest to wait for some feedback from Nekromanter...

Regards,
Sergey

On Nov 25, 11:36 am, Sergey Ushakov <s-n-usha...@nm.ru> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Sergey Ushakov  
View profile  
 More options Dec 2 2008, 5:07 pm
From: Sergey Ushakov <s-n-usha...@nm.ru>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 14:07:25 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Dec 2 2008 5:07 pm
Subject: Re: patch to LabeledMarker - improved visibility control
Hi Pamela,

the consent on issue 73 is achieved, and appropriate final revision is
available. I have not checked it in yet just to ask one more question
about API.

By the moment we can control label visibility either by hideLabel()/
showLabel() or by setLabelVisibility(). It's clear that these
different functions have appeared historically in the process of
realizing necessary API facilities, but aren't they finally somewhat
excessive? Perhaps we might consider deprecation either of them - just
to avoid confusion of new users? In the current revision the hideLabel
()/showLabel() pair is the right candidate for deprecation as they are
not fully functional, but it would be easy also to make them fully
functional and deprecate setLabelVisibility() instead - just to make
API more uniform...

What's your opinion?

Regards,
Sergey

On Nov 30, 8:17 pm, Sergey Ushakov <s-n-usha...@nm.ru> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
pamela fox  
View profile  
 More options Dec 2 2008, 7:46 pm
From: "pamela fox" <pamela....@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 11:46:44 +1100
Local: Tues, Dec 2 2008 7:46 pm
Subject: Re: patch to LabeledMarker - improved visibility control
Hmm. So I think I did showLabel/hideLabel to be parallel with
GMarker.show/hide, but now when thinking about it, it seems
programmatically better to have a setLabelVisibility function.
Developers could just pass in whatever booleans into that function
instead of having to do an if/else block.

So I'm fine with deprecating the show/hide. Going forward, I'd like to
deprecate the "release" branches of the libraries and just have the
version folders. That way we can fully deprecate(remove) functions in
new versions without worrying about breaking old versions.

Thanks for your effort on this!


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Sergey Ushakov  
View profile  
 More options Dec 3 2008, 1:31 am
From: Sergey Ushakov <s-n-usha...@nm.ru>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 22:31:20 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Dec 3 2008 1:31 am
Subject: Re: patch to LabeledMarker - improved visibility control
Ok Pamela, just to make things more clear:

should I better completely remove the showLabel/hideLabel pair or just
mark them as deprecated in jsdoc?

Regards,
Sergey

On Dec 3, 3:46 am, "pamela fox" <pamela....@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
pamela fox  
View profile  
 More options Dec 3 2008, 7:20 pm
From: "pamela fox" <pamela....@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:20:10 +1100
Local: Wed, Dec 3 2008 7:20 pm
Subject: Re: patch to LabeledMarker - improved visibility control
Let's just completely remove it.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Sergey Ushakov  
View profile  
 More options Dec 4 2008, 2:36 am
From: Sergey Ushakov <s-n-usha...@nm.ru>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 23:36:28 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Dec 4 2008 2:36 am
Subject: Re: patch to LabeledMarker - improved visibility control
Ok Pamela, I've checked in the new revision along with updated API
doc. I've also fixed the copy() method to reflect the new features.

Any more issues left? :)

On Dec 4, 3:20 am, "pamela fox" <pamela....@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
pamela fox  
View profile  
 More options Dec 7 2008, 4:17 am
From: "pamela fox" <pamela....@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 20:17:06 +1100
Local: Sun, Dec 7 2008 4:17 am
Subject: Re: patch to LabeledMarker - improved visibility control

Hey Sergey-
Checking out now, a few nits:

- Revision history in the JS. This doesn't seem necessary, as Google code
enables someone to view just the changes for a file. Example:
http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-utility-library-dev/source/list?path=/...

- mime-type should be set to HTML for the setlabeltext example.

- The various GOverlay methods show up in the docs now that they're
auto-generated (they weren't previously). I'm thinking we shouldn't show
them, as they're not really intended for general use, and they're implied by
the fact that LabeledMarker extends GOverlay. There's apparently an
"@ignore" tag for JSDoc, maybe we can use that?
http://jsdoctoolkit.org/wiki/?page=ignore

That's it, thanks!
- pamela


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Sergey Ushakov  
View profile  
 More options Dec 7 2008, 9:00 am
From: Sergey Ushakov <s-n-usha...@nm.ru>
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 06:00:42 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Dec 7 2008 9:00 am
Subject: Re: patch to LabeledMarker - improved visibility control
Hi Pamela, thanks for your hints.

I agree with all of them and will fix them at next check in.

My only concern is about revision history. I agree that JS code is not
the best place for it, but if we only rely on Google code repository
facilities, then some potentially important information like
references to discussions, etc may disappear from sight. Will it be a
good idea to introduce something like "release notes" file that might
accompany a new release? Or will it be a good idea to make more
extended comments to new revisions in the svn, so that to include all
references, etc? Or maybe you may have other ideas?

Regards,
Sergey

On Dec 7, 12:17 pm, "pamela fox" <pamela....@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Sergey Ushakov  
View profile  
 More options Dec 13 2008, 3:44 am
From: Sergey Ushakov <s-n-usha...@nm.ru>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 00:44:11 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Dec 13 2008 3:44 am
Subject: Re: patch to LabeledMarker - improved visibility control
Hi Pamela,

I have noticed that some of Google Code projects hold their release
notes in Wiki area, like this one: http://code.google.com/p/mupen64plus/wiki/ReleasePage
.

May it be a good idea if project notes for Google Maps Utility Library
will be arranged like this?

Regards,
Sergey

On Dec 7, 5:00 pm, Sergey Ushakov <s-n-usha...@nm.ru> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
pamela fox  
View profile  
 More options Dec 15 2008, 12:28 am
From: "pamela fox" <pammyla....@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:28:10 +1100
Local: Mon, Dec 15 2008 12:28 am
Subject: Re: patch to LabeledMarker - improved visibility control

Yeah, I do that for the Maps APIs as well. Shall I create a Changelog wiki
in the release project (as opposed to dev project)?


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Sergey Ushakov  
View profile  
 More options Dec 15 2008, 12:58 am
From: Sergey Ushakov <s-n-usha...@nm.ru>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:58:16 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Dec 15 2008 12:58 am
Subject: Re: patch to LabeledMarker - improved visibility control
Well Pamela, it might be a good idea, but it's up to you.

And I have no ambitions to write into the release wiki if it does not
fit standard procedures/approaches :)

I can equally make a separate text or html file with these release
notes. Just tell me which approach will fit best. And if separate
html, then it would be great if you give me a reference to some sample
of structure/styling.

Regards,
Sergey

On Dec 15, 8:28 am, "pamela fox" <pammyla....@gmail.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Sergey Ushakov  
View profile  
 More options Dec 21 2008, 10:18 am
From: Sergey Ushakov <s-n-usha...@nm.ru>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 07:18:30 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Dec 21 2008 10:18 am
Subject: Re: patch to LabeledMarker - improved visibility control
Hi Pamela,

I've finally extracted all the "release notes" into a separate plain
text file and submitted it to the svn.

Is there anything more to be wished before the new release?

Regards,
Sergey

On Dec 15, 8:58 am, Sergey Ushakov <s-n-usha...@nm.ru> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Messages 1 - 25 of 34   Newer >
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google