I agree with rjhintz's interpretation.
I think, that more than a authoritative answer on the meaning of this
attribute, we have to know what is its effect on the maps ! I never
saw any rendering differences whatever value of divider is selected. I
do not know at all if it has an influence on prohibiting turns through
any divider on an intersection. It would sound logical, but as a
consequence when a divider is interrupted at an intersection, it would
be necessary to create a very short segment without divider, or to
edit the turn directions.
I would also point out that the french translation of this attribute
is actually ununderstandable : for instance "legal divider" is
translated to "frontière administrative" which means "administrative
boundary". Yes, I know about Google in Your Language and I submitted
improved tranlations, but nothing happens not even a receipt, as one
says "it' like pissing into a violin"
On 1 déc, 02:48, AM909 <
alan.mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If I remember correctly, this was asked previously, and there was no
> clear consensus on what to do.
>
> I use physical divider when I know there to be a barrier of some kind
> (planter, concrete barrier, rail, air or dirt between separate
> roadbeds etc.). I use "legal divider" and/or "divider present"
> probably inconsistently for road-striping that separate opposite
> traffic directions.
>
> There probably is/was/should be a proposal to fix this ambiguity.
> Don't forget to include movable barriers, which are used (at least) in
> the US to allow more lanes in one direction than the other at
> different times of day to accommodate commuter patterns.
>