Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received: by 10.101.90.16 with SMTP id s16mr46933anl.29.1254355593700; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:06:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:06:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <43ed2013-bd8e-49bd-bc96-2531d46f1625@h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com> X-IP: 172.24.6.65 References: <3b078529-d8b2-4148-acd3-83713088f076@n2g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <43ed2013-bd8e-49bd-bc96-2531d46f1625@h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8; en-us) AppleWebKit/531.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.3 Safari/531.9,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Message-ID: <1aa27ba0-56e7-445b-80f7-36e3bb587c7d@13g2000prl.googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Invitation to Video SEX Chat From: Trevor Johns To: Google Data Protocol On Sep 30, 3:49=A0pm, Trevor Johns wrote: > On Sep 28, 4:44=A0am, Charlie Wood wrote: > > > You know, Google Groups has a pretty nifty moderation feature where a > > group admin can mark a post as spam and it will be deleted. It would > > be nice if Google would pay someone minimum wage to moderate these > > forums. > > > Charlie > > It's getting on my nerves too. I don't have admin access to this > group, but I'm going to track down somebody who does and make the spam > stop. > > -- Trevor Johns Alright, it looks like I'm the moderator for this group now. There won't be any more spam here. -- Trevor Johns