Google Guice 3.0 Release

[Susanne]

We are considering to use Google Guice for a project but we would like
to rely on a JSR-330 compliant implementation. We understand that only
release 3.0 of Google Guice will be a full JSR-330 implementation
(interchangable use of the Guice and javax-annotations).

What is the planned roadmap for Google Guice 3.0? When will it be
officially released?

Thank you for your help!
Susanne

[h3adache]

I'm curious about this too. There hasn't been an official release
since May 2009.
I see that the snapshot for 3 was released Oct 31st. Is that hope that
an official release is close or is this more like an alpha release?

On Nov 1, 9:45 am, Susanne <suc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We are considering to use Google Guice for a project but we would like

> to rely on a JSR-330 compliant implementation. We understand that onlyrelease3.0 of Google Guice will be a full JSR-330 implementation

[Sam Berlin]

The more people who use the guice3 snapshot & report back how it worked for them (either good or bad), the sooner a release will come.

sam

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group.
To post to this group, send email to google...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-guice...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en.

[Christian Goudreau]

Perfect for me to date :D

Cheers

--
Christian Goudreau

www.arcbees.com

[Tim Peierls]

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Sam Berlin <sbe...@gmail.com> wrote:

The more people who use the guice3 snapshot & report back how it worked for them (either good or bad), the sooner a release will come.

I was delighted to discover that a library that I want to use (jclouds) that previously depended on specific local build of Guice 2.1 (or what was shaping up as 2.1) -- and wouldn't work with earlier or later builds from elsewhere -- now works perfectly well with the Guice 3.0 snapshot.

I was also pleased at how easy it was to convert my code to use javax.inject types.

So that's two good things.

--tim

[Adrian Cole]

heh.. thanks for testing!

-Adrian
jclouds

--