Issue 89 in ctemplate: 16 of 20 tests failed in debug mode

10 views
Skip to first unread message

ctem...@googlecode.com

unread,
Mar 20, 2012, 8:58:00 AM3/20/12
to google-c...@googlegroups.com
Status: New
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium

New issue 89 by huas...@gmail.com: 16 of 20 tests failed in debug mode
http://code.google.com/p/ctemplate/issues/detail?id=89

What steps will reproduce the problem?
$ CPPFLAGS="-D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG" ./configure
$ make
$ make check

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
16 of 20 tests failed:

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
ctemplate-2.0, gcc 4.4, centos 6

Please provide any additional information below.
error message is in the attachment.

Attachments:
err.txt 15.0 KB

ctem...@googlecode.com

unread,
Mar 20, 2012, 9:40:30 AM3/20/12
to google-c...@googlegroups.com

Comment #1 on issue 89 by olafv...@gmail.com: 16 of 20 tests failed in
debug mode
http://code.google.com/p/ctemplate/issues/detail?id=89

Reproducible with gcc 4.4, but not with gcc 4.6. Might not be a bug in
ctemplate.

ctem...@googlecode.com

unread,
Apr 12, 2012, 7:05:24 AM4/12/12
to google-c...@googlegroups.com

Comment #2 on issue 89 by olafv...@gmail.com: 16 of 20 tests failed in
debug mode
http://code.google.com/p/ctemplate/issues/detail?id=89

Huas, do you think this is a bug in ctemplate? Could you try with a newer
gcc version?

ctem...@googlecode.com

unread,
Apr 12, 2012, 8:48:18 AM4/12/12
to google-c...@googlegroups.com

Comment #3 on issue 89 by huas...@gmail.com: 16 of 20 tests failed in debug
mode
http://code.google.com/p/ctemplate/issues/detail?id=89

I don't think it's a bug in ctemplate. The debug check in gcc 4.4 is too
strict.

ctem...@googlecode.com

unread,
Apr 12, 2012, 9:51:47 AM4/12/12
to google-c...@googlegroups.com
Updates:
Status: Invalid

Comment #4 on issue 89 by olafv...@gmail.com: 16 of 20 tests failed in
debug mode
http://code.google.com/p/ctemplate/issues/detail?id=89

(No comment was entered for this change.)

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages