hello, why don't just make gcf to being always active intead of using
the gcf tag? why just use gcf tag??
-.-
any ideas? is good? any product ploblem that can't make the gcf to
always run?
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Abc <niquito.larig...@gmail.com> wrote: > hello, why don't just make gcf to being always active intead of using > the gcf tag? why just use gcf tag??
Because we want to allow new sites to use HTML5 features will not breaking old sites that require legacy IE features. Users who want a better experience for all sites can just use Chrome.
> any ideas? is good? any product ploblem that can't make the gcf to > always run?
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google-chrome-frame" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-chrome-frame@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-chrome-frame+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-chrome-frame?hl=en.
Because not all sites work with Chrome or may not style properly in
Chrome, so better to be explicit about which sites do work with Chrome
and leave the others to render with the Internet Explorer engine
On Jul 11, 3:39 pm, Abc <niquito.larig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hello, why don't just make gcf to being always active intead of using
> the gcf tag? why just use gcf tag??
> -.-
> any ideas? is good? any product ploblem that can't make the gcf to
> always run?
> Because not all sites work with Chrome or may not style properly in
> Chrome, so better to be explicit about which sites do work with Chrome
> and leave the others to render with the Internet Explorer engine
> On Jul 11, 3:39 pm, Abc <niquito.larig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > hello, why don't just make gcf to being always active intead of using
> > the gcf tag? why just use gcf tag??
> > -.-
> > any ideas? is good? any product ploblem that can't make the gcf to
> > always run?
Can you elaborate on the use case you're thinking of or a particular problem?
An important feature of of GCF is for the user to not have to participate in the choice of whether GCF is enabled or not. It's the content that controls it. For example there is no option to turn Flash on or off in a toolbar. Comparing GCF with windows messenger is apples and oranges.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Abc <niquito.larig...@gmail.com> wrote: > then make an optio allowing disable chrome frame, just do a ie toolbar > buttton like the win messenger
> On Jul 12, 3:48 am, mikeq <mq5037...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Because not all sites work with Chrome or may not style properly in > > Chrome, so better to be explicit about which sites do work with Chrome > > and leave the others to render with the Internet Explorer engine
> > On Jul 11, 3:39 pm, Abc <niquito.larig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > hello, why don't just make gcf to being always active intead of using > > > the gcf tag? why just use gcf tag?? > > > -.- > > > any ideas? is good? any product ploblem that can't make the gcf to > > > always run?
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google-chrome-frame" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-chrome-frame@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-chrome-frame+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<google-chrome-frame%2Bunsu bscribe@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-chrome-frame?hl=en.
