GTLFramework building issues.

[Dice-K]

When I going to build GTL project, 9 errors appear
GTMHTTPFetcherLogging.m.

"Category is implementing a method which will also be implemented by
its primary class"

How do I configure the GTL.xcodeproj?

Project version in ReleaseNotes.txt is "22-December-2011".

Dice-K

[David Phillip Oster]

A quick, temporary workaround is simply to not include GTMHTTPFetchLogging.m in your project, for now.

[Greg Robbins]

I just tried a clean check-out of the project from the subversion repository, and was able to build each of the project targets with Xcode 4 without difficulty.

Likely there is an inconsistency in the target you are building of the STRIP_GTM_FETCH_LOGGING preprocessor flag, as some methods compile either in the GTMHTTPFetcher class or in the GTMHTTPFetcherLogging class depending on the value of that flag.

[Greg Robbins]

We have revised the sources for better compatibility with recent compilers, as newer compilers are more strict about category interfaces and implementations.

http://code.google.com/p/gtm-http-fetcher/source/detail?r=98

Please update your sources from subversion, and let us know if you continue to have any difficulty with this.

Thank you for bringing it to our attention.

[David Lowe]

I'm pretty inexperienced with SVN but for some reason I was still getting those 9 warnings (not errors) even after I ran 

svn checkout http://gdata-objectivec-client.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ gdata-objectivec-client-read-only

in the terminal.  (XCode version 4.3.2)

However, when I just manually added the changes posted from Greg's link into GTMHTTPFetcherLogging.m it got rid of them.  Am I doing something wrong with my subversion checkout?  Is adding that code manually going to screw things up for me later?

Thanks!

David

[Greg Robbins]

It's ok to manually modify the checked out files. You can always see your changes with svn diff, and revert to the latest checked-in versions with svn revert.

A clean check-out should work unmodified with the current Xcode compilers, though.