Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Garbage collection and performance in gccgo
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Russ Cox  
View profile  
 More options Apr 17 2010, 10:58 pm
From: Russ Cox <r...@golang.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 19:58:48 -0700
Local: Sat, Apr 17 2010 10:58 pm
Subject: Re: [go-nuts] Garbage collection and performance in gccgo
Following up on what Rob said, here's what the bottom of timing.log shows:

 1.0x reverse-complement
 1.2x mandelbrot
 1.4x k-nucleotide
 1.4x nbody
 1.5x fasta
 1.7x meteor
 2.0x spectral-norm
 2.1x fannkuch
      (better array bounds checks would get to 1.5x)
 5.6x binary-tree
      (comparing malloc+free against garbage collector)
10.5x regex-dna
      (different algorithms; Go has better worst case)
14.8x pidigits
      (different bignum packages)
 0.7x chameneos
      (different thread libraries)
 1.0x threadring
      (different thread libraries)

Only the first eight are close to fair comparisons, and Go is doing
reasonably well.  I don't believe it would take much to get those to 1.2x.

Russ

--
Subscription settings: http://groups.google.com/group/golang-nuts/subscribe?hl=en


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.