I noticed this "GO" came out because of a link on digg.com. I saw 20
minutes of the google techtalk and understood only one thing very
clearly: Go is much more efficient then C++, "fun" and costs less
time. So, I thought it might be a nice time to start programming for
ones.
as a complete beginner (embryo) in this field I was wondering where I
could find a tutorial to start learning the simplest of tags to use
GO?
I'm in the same boat as you embryonic, I'm looking to get back into
programming and Go looks like an appealing language with which to do
so. The problem is that Go was quite literally just released to the
public a few days ago, so right now everyone (veteran progammers
included) are trying to figure it all out. I'd love to see some
tutorials pop up, maybe even a community site for new Go programmers
too. Anyone on here know of any efforts to spearhead that?
Alan wrote:
> I'm in the same boat as you embryonic, I'm looking to get back into
> programming and Go looks like an appealing language with which to do
> so. The problem is that Go was quite literally just released to the
> public a few days ago, so right now everyone (veteran progammers
> included) are trying to figure it all out. I'd love to see some
> tutorials pop up, maybe even a community site for new Go programmers
> too. Anyone on here know of any efforts to spearhead that?
tnx for the info about syntax, I'll be looking into that...I have yet
to install the go program. however, if I understand you correctly I
cannot run GO in a windows environment?
embryonic programmer <c.r.cr...@gmail.com> writes:
> tnx for the info about syntax, I'll be looking into that...I have yet
> to install the go program. however, if I understand you correctly I
> cannot run GO in a windows environment?
That is correct: Go does not yet support Windows. Sorry.
<christofferh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You'll need some sort of Unix/BSDbased system though.
This needs clarification. My understanding is that you can use Linux
or Mac OS X. But since there is no runtime for them yet, you can't
use FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD or other flavors of Unix. Only Linux or
Mac OS X. Correct?
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:21, ck <corky1...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Nov 12, 8:39 am, Christoffer Hallas Pedersen
> <christofferh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> You'll need some sort of Unix/BSDbased system though.
> This needs clarification. My understanding is that you can use Linux
> or Mac OS X. But since there is no runtime for them yet, you can't
> use FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD or other flavors of Unix. Only Linux or
> Mac OS X. Correct?
