Reviewers:
golang-dev_googlegroups.com,
Message:
Hello
golan...@googlegroups.com,
I'd like you to review this change to
https://go.googlecode.com/hg/
Description:
exp/locale/collate: avoid 16-bit math
There's no need for the 16-bit arithmetic here,
and it tickles a long-standing compiler bug.
Fix the exp code not to use 16-bit math and
create an explicit test for the compiler bug.
Please review this at
http://codereview.appspot.com/6256048/
Affected files:
M src/pkg/exp/locale/collate/colelem.go
A test/bugs/bug440.go
Index: src/pkg/exp/locale/collate/colelem.go
===================================================================
--- a/src/pkg/exp/locale/collate/colelem.go
+++ b/src/pkg/exp/locale/collate/colelem.go
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
)
func splitContractIndex(ce colElem) (index, n, offset int) {
- h := uint16(ce)
+ h := ce & 0xffff
return int(h >> maxNBits), int(h & (1<<maxNBits - 1)), int(ce>>16) &
(1<<maxContractOffsetBits - 1)
}
Index: test/bugs/bug440.go
===================================================================
new file mode 100644
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/bugs/bug440.go
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+// $G $D/$F.go && $L $F.$A && ./$A.out
+// # switch above to 'run' when bug gets fixed.
+// # right now it only breaks on 8g
+
+// Test for 8g register move bug. The optimizer gets confused
+// about 16- vs 32-bit moves during splitContractIndex.
+
+package main
+
+func main() {
+ const c = 0x12345678
+ index, n, offset := splitContractIndex(c)
+ if index != int((c&0xffff)>>5) || n != int(c & (1<<5-1)) || offset !=
(c>>16)&(1<<14-1) {
+ println("BUG", index, n, offset)
+ }
+}
+
+func splitContractIndex(ce uint32) (index, n, offset int) {
+ h := uint16(ce)
+ return int(h >> 5), int(h & (1<<5 - 1)), int(ce>>16) & (1<<14 - 1)
+}