Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
builders missing in action
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  6 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Dave Cheney  
View profile  
 More options Apr 25 2012, 1:59 am
From: Dave Cheney <d...@cheney.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:59:02 +1000
Local: Wed, Apr 25 2012 1:59 am
Subject: builders missing in action
I'm guessing linux-arm-pando belongs to adg, so it might take a while.

Who is running the 386 windows builder, it might need a kick.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Brad Fitzpatrick  
View profile  
 More options Apr 25 2012, 2:34 am
From: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradf...@golang.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:34:51 -0700
Local: Wed, Apr 25 2012 2:34 am
Subject: Re: [golang-dev] builders missing in action

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Dave Cheney <d...@cheney.net> wrote:
> I'm guessing linux-arm-pando belongs to adg, so it might take a while.

That's on my desk at work.  I can't log in to it, so I don't know what's
up.  Will look tomorrow.

Who is running the 386 windows builder, it might need a kick.


I restarted it earlier today.  Don't know why it's dead either.  Will also
look tomorrow.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Brad Fitzpatrick  
View profile  
 More options Apr 25 2012, 9:10 pm
From: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradf...@golang.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:10:23 -0700
Local: Wed, Apr 25 2012 9:10 pm
Subject: Re: [golang-dev] builders missing in action

386 builder was just hung.  Ctrl-C, up, enter, ... fixed?.

ARM builder had no green power happy blinking light.  Unplugged from wall,
plugged back in... all good.

Computers.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mikio Hara  
View profile  
 More options Apr 25 2012, 9:34 pm
From: Mikio Hara <mikioh.mik...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:34:01 +0900
Local: Wed, Apr 25 2012 9:34 pm
Subject: Re: [golang-dev] builders missing in action

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Brad Fitzpatrick <bradf...@golang.org> wrote:
> ARM builder had no green power happy blinking light.  Unplugged from wall,
> plugged back in... all good.

> Computers.

No watchdog bark? then you might consider to have a industrial
power strip that has small TCP/IP stack and network interfaces. ;)

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Brad Fitzpatrick  
View profile  
 More options Apr 25 2012, 9:37 pm
From: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradf...@golang.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:37:36 -0700
Local: Wed, Apr 25 2012 9:37 pm
Subject: Re: [golang-dev] builders missing in action

On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Mikio Hara <mikioh.mik...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Brad Fitzpatrick <bradf...@golang.org>
> wrote:

> > ARM builder had no green power happy blinking light.  Unplugged from
> wall,
> > plugged back in... all good.

> > Computers.

> No watchdog bark?

If it has one, it's obviously not configured [properly].

> then you might consider to have a industrial
> power strip that has small TCP/IP stack and network interfaces. ;)

I actually have an extra one of those.  I'd rather minimize the number of
parts here.  It's not high priority if somebody has to power cycle it
occasionally.  We'll see how reliable it turns out to be going forward.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
minux  
View profile  
 More options Apr 26 2012, 2:01 am
From: minux <minux...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:01:38 +0800
Local: Thurs, Apr 26 2012 2:01 am
Subject: Re: [golang-dev] builders missing in action

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Brad Fitzpatrick <bradf...@golang.org>wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Mikio Hara <mikioh.mik...@gmail.com>wrote:

>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Brad Fitzpatrick <bradf...@golang.org>
>> wrote:

>> > ARM builder had no green power happy blinking light.  Unplugged from
>> wall,
>> > plugged back in... all good.
>> No watchdog bark?

> If it has one, it's obviously not configured [properly].

omap4430 has a watchdog, and has support in Linux kernel.
but you have to use it manually by accessing /dev/watchdog.
(reference program:
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~gruemaster/+junk/watchdog/files,
but I don't try it because my builder needs manual setup at
boot time)

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »