From: Richard Kettlewell <r...@sfere.greenend.org.uk>
Subject: Re: GNU readline usage
Date: 1999/06/20
Message-ID: <wwvso7mvlfe.fsf@sfere.greenend.org.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 491993408
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: sfere.greenend.org.uk
References: <uyw4skqh0tm.fsf@chem.gla.ac.uk>     <928999430.428919@iris.nyx.net> <7jod6a$2bn$1@flotsam.uits.indiana.edu>     <m2lndscgxi.fsf@mailhost.neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>     <7jp14m$ucf$1@harbinger.nn.com>     <m2iu8v82na.fsf@mailhost.neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>     <slrn7mj80v.4q.irclark@latveria.castledoom.org>     <m2emj93mts.fsf@mailhost.neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>     <slrn7mlh96.cv.irclark@latveria.castledoom.org>     <m2vhclghu8.fsf@mailhost.neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>     <7kfpdu$jn6$1@justus.ecc.lu> <wwvyahgumrt.fsf@sfere.greenend.org.uk> <7kijcr$q7f$1@justus.ecc.lu>
Organization: Enemies of...
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss

Stefaan.Eeck...@ecc.lu (Stefaan A Eeckels) writes:

> You're quite correct - the sentence is very convoluted, but when
> read twice, it prohibits *only* reselling/lending etc in another
> cover than the original. Without cover seems to be OK, but that is
> probably not what the condition intends.

I read ``any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is
published'' to include `no cover at all', as well as covers different
from the original.

-- 
http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/