Received: by 10.180.105.41 with SMTP id gj9mr1582896wib.3.1350183196249;
        Sat, 13 Oct 2012 19:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
Path: q10ni65116159wif.0!nntp.google.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!194.109.133.85.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newspeer1.nac.net!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nrc-news.nrc.ca!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!border1.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.brightview.co.uk!news.brightview.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 09:11:19 -0500
From: Tim Jackson <n...@timjackson.invalid>
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,misc.int-property
Subject: Re: [upcoming] The European Court of Justice on 'Software' First Sale
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 15:11:00 +0100
Message-ID: <MPG.2adcef3b8299fe05989e10@text.usenet.plus.net>
References: <4F511210.98A94E19@web.de> <5065832F.12351CF9@web.de> <k44anu$vi7$2@matchbox.inf.ed.ac.uk> <506957D8.B1178869@web.de> <MPG.2ad3cee46ac87de8989def@text.usenet.plus.net> <506AA1B0.A61C9A73@web.de> <506AA380.FBF716E5@web.de> <MPG.2ad4d296e39255ed989df3@text.usenet.plus.net> <506D4235.77A2FCAF@web.de> <MPG.2ad76f3842dcd30989dfe@text.usenet.plus.net> <MPG.2ad776beec03f431989e00@text.usenet.plus.net> <506DD734.C49562BF@web.de> <MPG.2ad852357a110c17989e03@text.usenet.plus.net> <506EA2DF.6B8396DA@web.de> <MPG.2ad8d1f17bb6da56989e05@text.usenet.plus.net> <506ECC6F.C263A584@web.de> <MPG.2ad8e2b25ac5f893989e06@text.usenet.plus.net> <506ED7EA.AE15D291@web.de> <MPG.2ad8eb6f239c32ce989e08@text.usenet.plus.net> <506EDBAC.AE8A70DA@web.de> <MPG.2ad8f2d6f793baad989e0a@text.usenet.plus.net> <50729A88.13A60381@web.de> <MPG.2adcadaf258aeeea989e0e@text.usenet.plus.net> <5072AD2F.550FC300@web.de> <MPG.2adcd59182269bcc989e0f@text.usenet.plus.net> <5072D8F4.97E8A9A5@web.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4
Lines: 38
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-DfI2WlGdu2Mxf4OGMg0KECwW8Ztza6I5ydPDLiaZpOiQ4kLIW6v1s06xOh5YLyE8UYQ2qdktppzASq9!MGi7kcGZXgIv2n/dsRTRuXjSZ1eD8chABzuA7mKX/n5lcmWQkbeGKEIqgmfWnXOl2pH9T34CzFzC!yJ6piGTYdksTBw3MRWp7rLI=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 3414
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 15:45:24 +0200, Alexander Terekhov wrote...
> 
> Tim Jackson wrote:
> [...]
> > (Hint: Differences include the fact that one uses the term "lawfully
> > made" while the other doesn't.  Similarities include the fact that both
> > relate only to the sale or transfer or other disposal of "that copy".
> > Not to the creation of new copies from it.)
> 
> Uhh, silly Jackson... again: creation of new copies in the case of GCC
> is perfectly fine and unrestricted thanks to the GPL's reproduction
> permission.

But that still doesn't support your argument.  I've had enough of 
explaining why.  Goodbye.

> 
> As for the rest, go send a patch to wikipedia... <chuckles>
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright#The_first-sale_doctrine_and_exhaustion_of_rights
> 
> "The first-sale doctrine and exhaustion of rights
>  
> Main articles: First-sale doctrine and Exhaustion of rights
>  
> Copyright law does not restrict the owner of a copy from reselling
> legitimately obtained copies of copyrighted works, provided that those
> copies were originally produced by or with the permission of the
> copyright holder. It is therefore legal, for example, to resell a
> copyrighted book or CD. "

And this doesn't support your argument either.  Again, I've had enough 
of explaining why.  Goodbye.

-- 
Tim Jackson
n...@timjackson.invalid
(Change '.invalid' to '.plus.com' to reply direct)