Received: by 10.66.89.162 with SMTP id bp2mr742804pab.4.1346306161015;
        Wed, 29 Aug 2012 22:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.87.77 with SMTP id v13mr2817469qal.5.1346306160850;
        Wed, 29 Aug 2012 22:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.173.202 with SMTP id v50mr410652yhl.19.1346306160826; Wed,
 29 Aug 2012 22:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
Path: a5ni26025pbv.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!r1no547027qas.0!news-out.google.com!da15ni2798639qab.0!nntp.google.com!r1no547019qas.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 22:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <aLOdneuehcC17aPNnZ2dnUVZ8kGdnZ2d@supernews.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.170.186.175;
 posting-account=klBmJwoAAAAMOa_6nXCejn1Gxu9X9Iy2
NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.170.186.175
References: <eb706ea0-e969-4e70-a6cc-5dcb4bbc4ced@googlegroups.com> <aLOdneuehcC17aPNnZ2dnUVZ8kGdnZ2d@supernews.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <628cb1be-8672-47c6-b887-1c82ae359f05@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: What about C implementation of GCC after cxx-conversion
From: lovecreatesbea...@gmail.com
Injection-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 05:56:00 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 7:40:25 PM UTC, Andrew Haley wrote:
> lovecreatesbea...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> > Will GCC still be officially maintained in C (along side with C++) under GNU?
> > 
> > Or the C implementaion version just dropped or what?
> 
> We're converting to C++.  GCC will need a C++ compiler.
> 
> It's an odd question to ask.  Why does it matter?
> 

Hi Andrew

I think C++ is too complex and *horrible* language :)

In case the C++ implementation fails, 
the community still has the chance to switch back to C implementation
if it always keeps the C version maintained.