Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Which is the best implementation of LISP family of languages for real world programming ?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
vanekl  
View profile  
 More options Jun 12 2010, 6:04 am
Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help, comp.lang.lisp, comp.lang.scheme, comp.lang.python, comp.lang.javascript
From: vanekl <va...@acd.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 03:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Jun 12 2010 6:04 am
Subject: Re: Which is the best implementation of LISP family of languages for real world programming ?
Antti "Andy" Ylikoski wrote:

snip

> Maybe it could be a good idea for someone to write an academic study
> of all these available Lisp implementations.  Even Interlisp still
> lives, as it was recently noted in this newsgroup.  (I did not check
> the Google.  Has someone alredy done so?  Ie. studied the existing
> many Lisp implementations?)

> regards, Antti J. Ylikoski
> Helsinki, Finland, the E.U.

Common Lisp Implementations: A Survey
http://common-lisp.net/~dlw/LispSurvey.html

You bring up a good point -- there are so many mature lisp
implementations
that you can "jump" implementations until you find one that meets your
needs.
--
Did you know that dolphins are just gay sharks?


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.