Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
gnu.emacs.help
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
size of initial frame changed from 22.3 to 23.2
Options
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
   1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Kevin Rodgers  
View profile  
 More options Jun 4 2010, 4:18 am
Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help
From: Kevin Rodgers <kevin.d.rodg...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 02:18:33 -0600
Local: Fri, Jun 4 2010 4:18 am
Subject: size of initial frame changed from 22.3 to 23.2
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
The size of the initial frame has changed:

On GNU Emacs 22.3.1 (i386-apple-darwin8.11.1, Carbon Version 1.6.0),
frame-height returns 40 and frame-width returns 80.

On GNU Emacs 23.2.1 (i386-apple-darwin8.11.1, NS apple-appkit-824.48),
frame-height returns 34 and frame-width returns 80.

Both executables started with -Q, no .Xresources or .Xdefaults files.

I think I know how to fix it -- add (height . 40) to initial-frame-alist
in my .emacs -- but what is the root cause of this change?

Now use-fancy-splash-screens-p returns nil in Emacs 23 whereas it returned t
in Emacs 22, because (a) the frame height has decreased from 40 to 34 and (b)
the image-height has increased from 13.5625 to 14.4667. So the frame height
minus 1 (= 33) is no longer greater than the sum of the image height plus 19
(= 33.4667).

--
Kevin Rodgers
Denver, Colorado, USA


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google