Insha Allah, I am now trying to choose an editor for my software development and typesetting work. I have closely considered Emacs, which fits my needs in some respects. I do, however, feel that there is a big security issue with it for me and my brethren: Emacs was largely developed by Jews and for Jews. Considering how cunning the Jews are, I would not be surprised to find that they have hidden special bugs and booby traps inside emacs, in order to spy on and disrupt work of my Allah believing brethren. Are my concerns justified?
Just join this one true religion, and all your doubts will clear up, and all your problems will be solved, and all your hatred will melt away (except of course, against those VI blasphemers).
--Deepak, http://www.glue.umd.edu/~deego 22:46 Never have We sent a single manual or documentation before you with whose wishes VI did not tamper. But EMACS abrogates the interjections of VI and confirms His own revelations. EMACS is wise and all-knowing. He makes VI's interjections a temptation for those whose hearts are diseased or hardened - this is why the wrongdoers are in open schism - so that those to whom knowledge has been given may realize that this is the truth from your EMACS and thus believe in it and humble their hearts towards him. EMACS will surely guide the faithful to a straight path.
You can download the entire source code of Emacs and analyse all of it for security problems. If you find such problems and post them via Emac's bug posting feature (or still better fix them), all Emacs users would greatly appreciate it.
And don't forget: Ismael and Isaac were brothers from the same family. Maybe many of their current decendants will like and use Emacs.
Best regards,
Lucien -- This message is only for the addressee(s). If you receive it by error, please delete it and inform the sender. We recommend pgp-encrypted e-mail. Welcome to: http://www.consult-meyers.com "Don't fight reality, face it." --- to big brother from GNU/Emacs spook: SDI spy NSA strategic radar Albanian Honduras FBI NORAD domestic disruption assassination Qaddafi Soviet BATF $400 million in gold bullion
--(Once apon a time, in gnu.emacs.help,)-- --(Adoh Fadduq said it like only they can.)--
> Insha Allah, I am now trying to choose an editor for my software > development and typesetting work. I have closely considered Emacs, > which fits my needs in some respects. I do, however, feel that there is > a big security issue with it for me and my brethren: Emacs was largely > developed by Jews and for Jews. Considering how cunning the Jews are, > I would not be surprised to find that they have hidden special bugs > and booby traps inside emacs, in order to spy on and disrupt work of my > Allah believing brethren. Are my concerns justified?
As a non Jew I take great offense to these statements of yours. Us non-Jews can be every bit as cunning and malicious as any Jew. Some Cunning non-Jews: Bill Gates Hitler Rommel William Jefferson Clinton Thomas Jefferson Linus Travoldus Chris Carter Terry Spelling OJ Simpson Marilyn Manson Alan Greenspan Stalin
and a whole host of others. All of the above are cunning and some of them are down right evil (Spelling, Gates and Hitler in order of evilness)
So the next time you think the Jews are out to get you just remember there are lots of other people out to make your life miserable.
-- --(t...@faux.local|04:45|/home/faux)-- cat .sig GUI's are for slackers. ibpconf.sh 6.1 on freshmeat.net The easiest way to customize the command line. By Faux_Pseudo
It's a damn poor mind that can only think of one way to spell a word. - Andrew Jackson
> Insha Allah, I am now trying to choose an editor for my software > development and typesetting work. I have closely considered Emacs, > which fits my needs in some respects. I do, however, feel that there is > a big security issue with it for me and my brethren: Emacs was largely > developed by Jews and for Jews. Considering how cunning the Jews are, > I would not be surprised to find that they have hidden special bugs > and booby traps inside emacs, in order to spy on and disrupt work of my > Allah believing brethren. Are my concerns justified?
fad...@amnet.net.ae (Adoh Fadduq) writes: > Insha Allah, I am now trying to choose an editor for my software > development and typesetting work. I have closely considered Emacs, > which fits my needs in some respects. I do, however, feel that there is > a big security issue with it for me and my brethren: Emacs was largely > developed by Jews and for Jews. Considering how cunning the Jews are, > I would not be surprised to find that they have hidden special bugs > and booby traps inside emacs, in order to spy on and disrupt work of my > Allah believing brethren. Are my concerns justified?
Yes. You should definately use XEmacs instead.
-- #include <disclaimer.std> /* I don't speak for IBM ... */ /* Heck, I don't even speak for myself */ /* Don't believe me ? Ask my wife :-) */ Richard D. Latham lath...@us.ibm.com
[A complimentary Cc of this posting was sent to Adoh Fadduq <fad...@amnet.net.ae>], who wrote in article <989898671967...@amnet.net.ae>:
> Insha Allah, I am now trying to choose an editor for my software > development and typesetting work. I have closely considered Emacs, > which fits my needs in some respects. I do, however, feel that there is > a big security issue with it for me and my brethren: Emacs was largely > developed by Jews and for Jews. Considering how cunning the Jews are, > I would not be surprised to find that they have hidden special bugs > and booby traps inside emacs, in order to spy on and disrupt work of my > Allah believing brethren. Are my concerns justified?
One datapoint for you to extrapolate: I personally inserted many hidden special bugs into Emacs source code (but not XEmacs one!). Assuming that many Emacs developers are more Jewish/cunning/buggy/contributing than myself, there should be *zillions* of special cunning Jewish bugs in Emacs.
Using the same datapoint, XEmacs should be much better for you and your Allah believing brethren.
Adoh> Considering how cunning the Jews are, I would not be Adoh> surprised to find that they have hidden special bugs and Adoh> booby traps inside emacs, in order to spy on and disrupt Adoh> work of my Allah believing brethren.
This is unlikely, but you may find yourself victim of an even more sinister and subtle plot. You may find yourself endlessly customizing .emacs and .gnus, and no longer have any time to pursue your programming and text formatting work. Please carefully read the thread 'Spending too much time customizing emacs' above before making any decision to commit to emacs.
you posted this on google groups (partial quate)" As a non Jew I take great offense to these statements of yours. Us non-Jews can be every bit as cunning and malicious as any Jew. Some Cunning non-Jews: Bill Gates Hitler Rommel William Jefferson Clinton Thomas Jefferson Linus Travoldus Chris Carter Terry Spelling OJ Simpson Marilyn Manson Alan Greenspan Stalin
"
as a jew i am offended when people take credit for the actions of members our group. alan greenspan is jewish! see this biography in wiki:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Greenspan
> > Insha Allah, I am now trying to choose an editor for my software > > development and typesetting work. I have closely considered Emacs, > > which fits my needs in some respects. I do, however, feel that there is > > a big security issue with it for me and my brethren: Emacs was largely > > developed by Jews and for Jews. Considering how cunning the Jews are, > > I would not be surprised to find that they have hidden special bugs > > and booby traps inside emacs, in order to spy on and disrupt work of my > > Allah believing brethren. Are my concerns justified?
I'm not jewish, either. But my life would be much less funny without that lovely jewish guys and gals there at Argentina right-winging (no offense) in the same mailing lists as I do!
Cordially, Ismael
PD. Un abrazo a todos, judíos o no judíos, right-wingers o progres cacas.
