Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion bug#12579: 24.1; Emacs 24.1 / 24.2 (daily) crashes
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Eli Zaretskii  
View profile  
 More options Nov 8 2012, 5:13 pm
Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug
From: Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 00:12:03 +0200
Local: Thurs, Nov 8 2012 5:12 pm
Subject: bug#12579: 24.1; Emacs 24.1 / 24.2 (daily) crashes

> From: "Fabrice Niessen" <f...@missioncriticalit.com>
> Cc: lek...@gmail.com,  12...@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 23:04:40 +0100

> My gut feeling is also that `es.exe' is (co-)responsible. In fact, this is more
> than a gut feeling, as it's somehow based on a beam of presumptions:

> - with the latest versions of Emacs, the infloop always occur when using
>   helm-for-files (never, for example, when using helm-M-x, which is the other
>   tool I'm using, as frequently, from Helm)

> - `es.exe' is launched after having typed at least 3 characters in the prompt,
>   and I've never seen an infloop with less characters (that is, only one or
>   two) typed at the prompt: I always have typed a pattern of at least 5 to 6
>   chars before the freeze occurs (sometimes, even much more, when being
>   deleting many characters because I typed an fault in the filename I'm after)

> - on Monday, after having gotten several frozen Emacs (since the last reboot
>   of Windows -- once every 3 weeks or so), I had noticed up to 7 instances of
>   `es.exe' (I guess they were hanging as some zombies, though I don't know to
>   prove this -- any idea?)

How (with what compiler) was es.exe compiled?  Was MinGW GCC, Cygwin
GCC, MSVC, something else?

> Does this give you more trust into Thierry's assumption?

Not really.  I'd need to know much more about es.exe, like how it
communicates with Emacs, and how it differs from any other
garden-variety of console programs, like locate.exe itself, before I
could make up my mind about this.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.