Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion bug#11959: 24.1.50; Warning: Lisp directory `C:/Emacs-24-2012-07-16/../site-lisp' does not exist.
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Jan Djärv  
View profile  
 More options Jul 30 2012, 2:05 am
Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug
From: Jan Djärv <jan....@swipnet.se>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 08:05:04 +0200
Local: Mon, Jul 30 2012 2:05 am
Subject: bug#11959: 24.1.50; Warning: Lisp directory `C:/Emacs-24-2012-07-16/../site-lisp' does not exist.

30 jul 2012 kl. 05:34 skrev Eli Zaretskii:

>> From: Glenn Morris <r...@gnu.org>
>> Cc: 11...@debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:50:28 -0400

>> Eli Zaretskii wrote:

>>> It would be easy enough to make sure the site-lisp directories exist
>>> before adding them to EMACSLOADPATH on Windows.

>> That's probably the simplest solution.

> I will do that, if this is the consensus.  Stefan, Chong, what say
> you?

>> Or make the install create them, as the POSIX installation does.

> The problem happens when you run the uninstalled binary as well.

>> Actually, my recommendation would be to stop setting EMACSLOADPATH (and
>> the other EMACS* environment variables...) on MS Windows, similar to
>> what I recently did for the NS port.

> I don't see how this is possible.  Emacs on Windows is built to be
> relocatable, because many users install precompiled binaries in any
> place they feel like.  So Emacs on Windows must determine its
> load-path at run time.  By contrast, the mainline code relies on file
> names hardwired into the executable at configure/build time, which is
> a non-starter.  What other devices do we have for forcing load-path to
> have a specific value, except setting EMACSLOADPATH?  I could, of
> course, ifdef away the entire code that does that on lread.c, and put
> there a Windows specific code instead, but is that really a better
> alternative?

The NS-port is also fully relocatable and determines load-path at runtime.

        Jan D.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.