Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

More hooks in bash completion

49 views
Skip to first unread message

gibboris

unread,
Nov 13, 2009, 8:08:30 AM11/13/09
to
Hello,
I'm trying to figure out how to get more of the readline granularity
in the bash completion process.
First of all I would like to fprintf to rl_outstream before
display_matches and from what I saw readline defines a
rl_completion_display_matches_hook which doesn't seem used by bash.
Not yet sure but using it would give a possibility to execute
something after the rl_complete_internal ('@') (especially
interesting in the case of the switch(what_to_do) {} of
rl_complete_internal calls append_to_match).

But the difficult part is to come from find_variable ("X"); bash-
readline completion appears like a complex process even if the code is
tidy.

In brief I'm looking the following thing :
1) use complete -F _a_bash_func -o myopts --post-hook
_another_bash_func command
or
1 bis) use complete -F _a_bash_func -o myopts command with complete
analysing COMPREPLY but also another variable containing a string to
be printed (eg POSTCOMP_STRING and/or POSTCOMP_CONDITION)

In the case 1), the bash functions would be hooked with the help
rl_completion_display_matches_hook.
In the case of 1 bis) the string would simply printed between
rl_insert_completions and rl_possible_completions (note, it seems
vi_mode is more flexible as a quick grep in emacs and vi keymap made
me discover rl_insert_completions AND rl_possible_completions while
emacs only uses rl_complete)

In both case having the possibility to conditionally hook according to
whether rl_complete_internal returned after
append_to_match or display_matches seems useful so shouldn't first
rl_complete_internal handle more append_to_match in a specific case
and put the if (matches[1]) one level upper ?

In the case of 1) both bash functions relative to one command doesn't
share their context so it's maybe more difficult and implies
reprocessing the command line words twice.
But the 1 bis) make harder for bash (programmer) to use option like
whether printing the string before each display_match, only after
append_to_match, ...


Some real use case :
- using bash functions for displaying matches (use of color as /bin/ls
bash_display_matches(), or, why printing both the long option and it's
use in display_matches() while only completing the command line with
the option string alone, ...
- conditionally process the command line according to whether the
completion successfully completed the word so, eg, if you burn-cd/
cdrecord, if a filename has been completed a progress bar may be
displayed to show the current size of the project, ... (idem with eg,
cp or scp)
In fact I think their should be different hook for completions (being
appended to command line if match : the COMPREPLY variable) and
suggestions (to be printed to help in the choice of the next
character) and the suggestion should be hookable (like said above it's
a readline feature not used by bash isn't)

Are there any hint/ideas/suggestions/url/previous_debates/... about
that ?
Should I dig it ? by beginning from the find_variable() of pcomplete.c
or the lib/{emacs,vi}{mode,keymap}.c ?

Raph

0 new messages