gmock-user

Just found the reason and fixed it. No business of gMock... Thank you. On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:17

Hi Tapas, Looks like a bug to me, please raise an issue here: https://code.google.com/p/gmock/issues/

Hi Tomasz, Do you mean this feature (https://code.google.com/p/gmock/issues/detail?id=53) or this

public class NumberUtils { public static int toInt(String str) { if (str == null) { return 0; } try {

Oops. sorry. Wrong door ;-) On Apr 19, 9:05 pm, Johnny Jian <johnnyjia...@gmail.com> wrote:

Could you give a specific example? Johnny On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 5:16 AM, Corona4456 <robertsaenz@

"expected 1, actual 1" means linkOrCreateProperty() is really called once, and the

It will be supported in GMock 1.0. (http://code.google.com/p/gmock/issues/detail?id=56) Johnny 2010-

We are proud to announce the release of GMock 0.8.1. This is a maintenance release with a few bug

Partial mocking and static mocking only for the code written in Groovy, but Struts 2 itself is

You can use the Hamcrest Matchers(http://code.google.com/p/hamcrest/) like: import static org.

You can mock the static methods of the domain class, and return a mocked instance of that class. On

Fixed on the trunk. Issue: http://code.google.com/p/gmock/issues/detail?id=92 On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at

Please raise an issue on http://code.google.com/p/gmock/issues/list Thank you very much. On Thu, Sep

There might be a way to mock what you are trying to achieve here. Create a special mock version of

Perfect that worked, thanks a lot On 14 Aug 2009, at 10:26, Johnny Jian wrote: Could you post the

Hello, I think you are talking about google mock, but gmock isn't google mock, it is groovy mock

We are proud to announce the release of GMock 0.8. This release provides the support for Groovy 1.6.

Comment by julien.gagnet: It's a lot of little step easy to miss. For more information: http://

Johnny is right about about final classes. However if you can live without the strong typing it

Perfect, thanks. On Apr 8, 6:34 pm, Johnny <johnnyjia...@gmail.com> wrote: > You can do like