Message from discussion
Blank GMarks
Received: by 10.114.254.1 with SMTP id b1mr80781wai.4.1217818853641;
Sun, 03 Aug 2008 20:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <johnm...@gmail.com>
Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.170])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v36si1565641wah.3.2008.08.03.20.00.52;
Sun, 03 Aug 2008 20:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of johnm...@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.200.170;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of johnm...@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=johnm...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so1607411wfg.7
for <GMarks@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 03 Aug 2008 20:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
bh=qu8tG5iLKeOek/Dq2ByWU9mezzGMcKgj1lCCpq/il/w=;
b=mGzd1ozjgja4fsIQRMPyxZlTucGIPhE9efNgoB+CXuRs5poan2ilpLtp2iPvnHgDYH
1lChy67QGL3FVRTo6IMJtVNb61DeIhvF10xL+NgnT7MyIH2zWKbwIEjLZUAtUNYWq/ME
olEexRI2asYT2nlaFD4LRPc05v4SjBSxrPyOE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
:content-type:references;
b=g7a8KeO2JdeSwS1lKeJIEPFluyvTMTByt7UuQHFlSiCz0MDFykcgDRm4t3PbV/Xnxv
Mr7dlJL8ayvfGhknn54ZNHv49xQ6D83R7M4VAxKyTPX5Gjw5+SQEsp45NxKfdfNR+/HI
d5cKMeTgmBeZJO4SC+QSPlBS6F/A6s1+ih29s=
Received: by 10.142.90.16 with SMTP id n16mr4750128wfb.130.1217818851694;
Sun, 03 Aug 2008 20:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.143.28.10 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Aug 2008 20:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4e7ecbc40808032000i4d68174aoe4fa76c7630728bb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 23:00:51 -0400
From: "John Marshall" <johnm...@gmail.com>
To: GMarks@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Blank GMarks
In-Reply-To: <4e7ecbc40808031959s141afff0u9cedceb26641...@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_24872_23113326.1217818851685"
References: <263a0502-3a10-43fd-a3b1-56f42daec...@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com>
<4e7ecbc40808010929n6c91016m7461c5f8286de...@mail.gmail.com>
<190abe2e-e50b-4304-890f-9700fa5a9...@v1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
<4e7ecbc40808031959s141afff0u9cedceb26641...@mail.gmail.com>
------=_Part_24872_23113326.1217818851685
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Oops, I remembered the forth later on and forgot to change that 3 at the
top!
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 10:59 PM, John Marshall <johnm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Google provides the bookmarks in 3 ways.
> Method #1 is an xml feed. The problem with this is it doesn't include notes
> Method #2 is an rss feed. The problem with this is it only includes http
> and https links (maybe a few others) and excludes links like you are having
> problems with.
> Method #1 & #2 return 1000 items per request
> Method #3 is a json feed from google notebook. The problem with this is it
> only includes 20 items per request. There is a num parameter in the query,
> but it ignores that. This means it would take a long time to download the
> bookmarks.
> Method #4 uses the gdata notebook api and the unfiled notebook. The problem
> with this is it only works with publicly published notebooks. I don't
> believe that is the cas
>
> There is no good way to get google bookmarks, I wish google could just fix
> that one problem for each method.
> GMarks uses method #2 btw.
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Reuben <reuben.he...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I guess Google hasnt actually ever seen this as a problem.
>>
>> Using the direct IP doesnt work so well with named virtual hosts.
>> Will look at using fully qualified domain names, where possible.
>>
>> On Aug 2, 2:29 am, "John Marshall" <johnm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Google strips these urls out of the rss feed GMarks uses to get the
>> > bookmarks. There is a workaround to make the url look like a normal url
>> to
>> > Google. See this:
>> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Bookmarks/browse_frm/thread/7fb...
>> >
>> > On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 3:00 AM, Reuben <reuben.he...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi
>> >
>> > > I think I remember seeing something about this before, but I just
>> > > wanted to double check.
>> >
>> > > I have some Google Bookmarks that are not available via the general
>> > > internet, because they point at local web servers, like
>> > >http://sugar/SugarSuite/.
>> >
>> > > I add the Bookmark via the "Add GMarks(Bypass add bookmark window)".
>> >
>> > > I can see the Bookmark in the side window, and it works.
>> >
>> > > I then alter the label, using the right-click "Add New Labels..."
>> > > option. I go to the label, and can see the Bookmark and it still
>> > > works.
>> >
>> > > Then I select the Refresh option from the GMarks dropdown menu, and
>> > > the side scroll refreshes. The Bookmark is still there, however, the
>> > > link no longer works. When I look at the properties for the Bookmark,
>> > > the URL is about:blank.
>> >
>> > > Actually, just trying again, and I dont even need to do the new label
>> > > thing. Simply adding a bookmark, and then doing a refresh seems to
>> > > result in the bookmark "loosing" its URL.
>> >
>> > > If I go to Manage Online, the URL is there, but it seems to have had
>> > > its http:// stripped from the front.
>> >
>> > > If I add the Bookmark manually via the
>> > >http://www.google.com/bookmarks/?hl=en
>> > > link, a similar thing happens. Is this Google seeking twisted justice
>> > > by not sending proper URLs for websites that it cant access?
>> >
>> > > I'm using GMarks 0.9.9 and FF3.0.1
>> >>
>>
>
------=_Part_24872_23113326.1217818851685
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
<div dir="ltr">Oops, I remembered the forth later on and forgot to change that 3 at the top!<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 10:59 PM, John Marshall <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:johnm...@gmail.com">johnm...@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div dir="ltr">Google provides the bookmarks in 3 ways. <br>Method #1 is an xml feed. The problem with this is it doesn't include notes<br>
Method #2 is an rss feed. The problem with this is it only includes http and https links (maybe a few others) and excludes links like you are having problems with. <br>
Method #1 & #2 return 1000 items per request<br>Method #3 is a json feed from google notebook. The problem with this is it only includes 20 items per request. There is a num parameter in the query, but it ignores that. This means it would take a long time to download the bookmarks. <br>
Method #4 uses the gdata notebook api and the unfiled notebook. The problem with this is it only works with publicly published notebooks. I don't believe that is the cas<br><br>There is no good way to get google bookmarks, I wish google could just fix that one problem for each method.<br>
GMarks uses method #2 btw.<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Reuben <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:reuben.he...@gmail.com" target="_blank">reuben.he...@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
I guess Google hasnt actually ever seen this as a problem.<br>
<br>
Using the direct IP doesnt work so well with named virtual hosts.<br>
Will look at using fully qualified domain names, where possible.<br>
<div><br>
On Aug 2, 2:29 am, "John Marshall" <<a href="mailto:johnm...@gmail.com" target="_blank">johnm...@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Google strips these urls out of the rss feed GMarks uses to get the<br>
> bookmarks. There is a workaround to make the url look like a normal url to<br>
</div>> Google. See this:<a href="http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Bookmarks/browse_frm/thread/7fb." target="_blank">http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Bookmarks/browse_frm/thread/7fb.</a>..<br>
<div><div></div><div>><br>
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 3:00 AM, Reuben <<a href="mailto:reuben.he...@gmail.com" target="_blank">reuben.he...@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> > Hi<br>
><br>
> > I think I remember seeing something about this before, but I just<br>
> > wanted to double check.<br>
><br>
> > I have some Google Bookmarks that are not available via the general<br>
> > internet, because they point at local web servers, like<br>
> ><a href="http://sugar/SugarSuite/" target="_blank">http://sugar/SugarSuite/</a>.<br>
><br>
> > I add the Bookmark via the "Add GMarks(Bypass add bookmark window)".<br>
><br>
> > I can see the Bookmark in the side window, and it works.<br>
><br>
> > I then alter the label, using the right-click "Add New Labels..."<br>
> > option. I go to the label, and can see the Bookmark and it still<br>
> > works.<br>
><br>
> > Then I select the Refresh option from the GMarks dropdown menu, and<br>
> > the side scroll refreshes. The Bookmark is still there, however, the<br>
> > link no longer works. When I look at the properties for the Bookmark,<br>
> > the URL is about:blank.<br>
><br>
> > Actually, just trying again, and I dont even need to do the new label<br>
> > thing. Simply adding a bookmark, and then doing a refresh seems to<br>
> > result in the bookmark "loosing" its URL.<br>
><br>
> > If I go to Manage Online, the URL is there, but it seems to have had<br>
> > its http:// stripped from the front.<br>
><br>
> > If I add the Bookmark manually via the<br>
> ><a href="http://www.google.com/bookmarks/?hl=en" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/bookmarks/?hl=en</a><br>
> > link, a similar thing happens. Is this Google seeking twisted justice<br>
> > by not sending proper URLs for websites that it cant access?<br>
><br>
> > I'm using GMarks 0.9.9 and FF3.0.1<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
------=_Part_24872_23113326.1217818851685--