HTML Signature Option
8 views
Skip to first unread message
Pramod C
Nov 23, 2009, 12:07:37 PM11/23/09
to Suggest a Labs feature
Currently we have to give text only signature. There should be an
option for HTML signature so that we can style our signature. Also
multiple signature option should also be there
option for HTML signature so that we can style our signature. Also
multiple signature option should also be there
Juliet
Nov 23, 2009, 4:47:52 PM11/23/09
to Suggest a Labs feature
i totally agree! it would be so fun to stylize the signatures. i
wanted mine to be in color, but currently that cant happen. thanks for
suggesting this
wanted mine to be in color, but currently that cant happen. thanks for
suggesting this
KiwiOca
Nov 23, 2009, 8:37:39 PM11/23/09
to Suggest a Labs feature
Agree! Whould like that too!
Dancer-In-The-<3
Nov 26, 2009, 2:54:21 PM11/26/09
to Suggest a Labs feature
OMG, totally! I need purple ink and "Marker Felt" script. Th@ just me,
tho. But it would also be awesome if they had, like symbols put into
the sigs. Cuz I totally have to add the stars, then hi-lite it & make
it purple, and it takes a while. I have a lot to do, since I am a
budding writer, & if I just wanna send a quick 'heyyy!' e-mail, I have
to do all of th@ stuff. Great idea, whoever thot of it!
TTYL,
*!U* *Know* *Who!*
tho. But it would also be awesome if they had, like symbols put into
the sigs. Cuz I totally have to add the stars, then hi-lite it & make
it purple, and it takes a while. I have a lot to do, since I am a
budding writer, & if I just wanna send a quick 'heyyy!' e-mail, I have
to do all of th@ stuff. Great idea, whoever thot of it!
TTYL,
*!U* *Know* *Who!*
Nicklarzn
Dec 1, 2009, 1:29:11 PM12/1/09
to Suggest a Labs feature
Year of course, this would be a very nice function! it would not only
appeal to the private user who just wants to "pimp" their signatures,
but also the minor and mid-sized cooperations and volounteer
organisations, who uses Gmail (eg. the Red cross youth
organisations???)
On 23 Nov., 18:07, Pramod C wrote:
> Currently we have to give text onlysignature. There should be an
appeal to the private user who just wants to "pimp" their signatures,
but also the minor and mid-sized cooperations and volounteer
organisations, who uses Gmail (eg. the Red cross youth
organisations???)
On 23 Nov., 18:07, Pramod C wrote:
> Currently we have to give text onlysignature. There should be an
Michael Baker
Dec 2, 2009, 2:51:56 PM12/2/09
to Suggest a Labs feature
All the lab add-ons Gmail has and no html basic signature? Common,
that's crazy. I've also been waiting for a GNU programmer to come up
with something to fix this and posted this same question about 3 years
ago but still no customizable signature line :(
On Nov 23, 9:07 am, Pramod C wrote:
> Currently we have to give text onlysignature. There should be an
> option forHTMLsignatureso that we can style oursignature. Also
that's crazy. I've also been waiting for a GNU programmer to come up
with something to fix this and posted this same question about 3 years
ago but still no customizable signature line :(
On Nov 23, 9:07 am, Pramod C wrote:
> Currently we have to give text onlysignature. There should be an
> option forHTMLsignatureso that we can style oursignature. Also
Gmail User 217
Dec 2, 2009, 10:59:51 PM12/2/09
to Suggest a Labs feature
Crazy in deed. I know Google is going after business to switch to
Google Mail instead of Lotus and Exchange. The web interface is great
which is one of the best selling point but it doesn't do Rich text
signature or html signatures. Every business has a brand which has to
be maintained so I can't emphasize how important it is for the web
interface to support these feature. Best case is inline rich text so
the image is embedded instead of just adding a URL which usually gets
filtered on the client's side. Google team, good work but please, this
is so old school. It should have been included long time ago, hurry
up.
Regards,
Desperate Gmail user
btw, we just went Google Mail and stopped using Exchange. It would be
great to get rid of Outlook once and for all.
Google Mail instead of Lotus and Exchange. The web interface is great
which is one of the best selling point but it doesn't do Rich text
signature or html signatures. Every business has a brand which has to
be maintained so I can't emphasize how important it is for the web
interface to support these feature. Best case is inline rich text so
the image is embedded instead of just adding a URL which usually gets
filtered on the client's side. Google team, good work but please, this
is so old school. It should have been included long time ago, hurry
up.
Regards,
Desperate Gmail user
btw, we just went Google Mail and stopped using Exchange. It would be
great to get rid of Outlook once and for all.
Litux
Dec 16, 2009, 6:31:45 PM12/16/09
to Suggest a Labs feature
I completely agree on the html signature wish. Our wishes should be
Google's commands ;-)
Regards,
Litux
Google's commands ;-)
Regards,
Litux
GuillaumeD
Dec 24, 2009, 3:24:16 AM12/24/09
to Suggest a Labs feature
I 100% agree! I'm living the same with my company.
> > > multiplesignatureoption should also be there- Masquer le texte des messages précédents -
>
> - Afficher le texte des messages précédents -
>
> - Afficher le texte des messages précédents -
abside
Jan 4, 2010, 10:22:54 AM1/4/10
to Suggest a Labs feature
I agree too, at least an option that put the picture in the
signature...
On 24 déc 2009, 09:24, GuillaumeD wrote:
> I 100% agree! I'm living the same with my company.
>
> On 3 déc, 04:59, Gmail User 217 wrote:
>
>
>
> > Crazy in deed. I know Google is going after business to switch to
> > Google Mail instead of Lotus and Exchange. The web interface is great
> > which is one of the best selling point but it doesn't do Rich text
> >signatureor html signatures. Every business has a brand which has to
signature...
On 24 déc 2009, 09:24, GuillaumeD wrote:
> I 100% agree! I'm living the same with my company.
>
> On 3 déc, 04:59, Gmail User 217 wrote:
>
>
>
> > Crazy in deed. I know Google is going after business to switch to
> > Google Mail instead of Lotus and Exchange. The web interface is great
> > which is one of the best selling point but it doesn't do Rich text
> > be maintained so I can't emphasize how important it is for the web
> > interface to support these feature. Best case is inline rich text so
> > the image is embedded instead of just adding a URL which usually gets
> > filtered on the client's side. Google team, good work but please, this
> > is so old school. It should have been included long time ago, hurry
> > up.
>
> > Regards,
> > Desperate Gmail user
>
> > btw, we just went Google Mail and stopped using Exchange. It would be
> > great to get rid of Outlook once and for all.
>
> > On Dec 2, 11:51 am, Michael Baker wrote:
>
> > > All the lab add-ons Gmail has and no html basicsignature? Common,
> > interface to support these feature. Best case is inline rich text so
> > the image is embedded instead of just adding a URL which usually gets
> > filtered on the client's side. Google team, good work but please, this
> > is so old school. It should have been included long time ago, hurry
> > up.
>
> > Regards,
> > Desperate Gmail user
>
> > btw, we just went Google Mail and stopped using Exchange. It would be
> > great to get rid of Outlook once and for all.
>
> > On Dec 2, 11:51 am, Michael Baker wrote:
>
> > > that's crazy. I've also been waiting for a GNU programmer to come up
> > > with something to fix this and posted this same question about 3 years
> > > ago but still no customizablesignatureline :(
> > > with something to fix this and posted this same question about 3 years
Elie Delorme
Jan 6, 2010, 12:48:40 PM1/6/10
to Suggest a Labs feature
The rich text format signature is extremely important to my company,
I'm trying to convince everyone to switch our exchange server to the
google apps solution, but this missing feature really makes it hard to
sell the idea, I realize we could just stick to Outlook and connect to
gmail servers but then Google's solution just becomes an "almost
exchange server".....
I'm trying to convince everyone to switch our exchange server to the
google apps solution, but this missing feature really makes it hard to
sell the idea, I realize we could just stick to Outlook and connect to
gmail servers but then Google's solution just becomes an "almost
exchange server".....
Deadly Knitshade
Jan 6, 2010, 8:13:48 PM1/6/10
to Suggest a Labs feature
I agree. This would be great.
ben.blanded
Jan 8, 2010, 8:30:56 AM1/8/10
to Suggest a Labs feature
I too agree. I often advise my clients to use gmail for many of it's
features, but lacking rich formatting on the signature really lets it
down. anybody able to write a gaget?
On Jan 6, 5:48 pm, Elie Delorme wrote:
> The rich text formatsignatureis extremely important to my company,
features, but lacking rich formatting on the signature really lets it
down. anybody able to write a gaget?
On Jan 6, 5:48 pm, Elie Delorme wrote:
> The rich text formatsignatureis extremely important to my company,
Jay in PA
Jan 13, 2010, 9:32:20 AM1/13/10
to Suggest a Labs feature
I'd like to add my voice to those calling for the rich text format
signature. It's one of the few things holding the Google mail solution
back from being great.
On Jan 8, 8:30 am, ben.blanded wrote:
> I too agree. I often advise my clients to use gmail for many of it's
> features, but lackingrichformatting on thesignaturereally lets it
signature. It's one of the few things holding the Google mail solution
back from being great.
On Jan 8, 8:30 am, ben.blanded wrote:
> I too agree. I often advise my clients to use gmail for many of it's
> down. anybody able to write a gaget?
>
> On Jan 6, 5:48 pm, Elie Delorme wrote:
>
> > Therichtext formatsignatureis extremely important to my company,
>
> On Jan 6, 5:48 pm, Elie Delorme wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to convince everyone to switch our exchange server to the
> > google apps solution, but this missing feature really makes it hard to
> > sell the idea, I realize we could just stick to Outlook and connect to
> > gmail servers but then Google's solution just becomes an "almost
> > exchange server".....
>
> > On Jan 4, 10:22 am, abside wrote:
>
> > > I agree too, at least an option that put the picture in thesignature...
>
> > > On 24 déc 2009, 09:24, GuillaumeD wrote:
>
> > > > I 100% agree! I'm living the same with my company.
>
> > > > On 3 déc, 04:59, Gmail User 217 wrote:
>
> > > > > Crazy in deed. I know Google is going after business to switch to
> > > > > Google Mail instead of Lotus and Exchange. The web interface is great
> > > > > which is one of the best selling point but it doesn't doRichtext
> > > > >signatureor html signatures. Every business has a brand which has to
> > > > > be maintained so I can't emphasize how important it is for the web
> > > > > interface to support these feature. Best case is inlinerichtext so
> > google apps solution, but this missing feature really makes it hard to
> > sell the idea, I realize we could just stick to Outlook and connect to
> > gmail servers but then Google's solution just becomes an "almost
> > exchange server".....
>
> > On Jan 4, 10:22 am, abside wrote:
>
> > > I agree too, at least an option that put the picture in thesignature...
>
> > > On 24 déc 2009, 09:24, GuillaumeD wrote:
>
> > > > I 100% agree! I'm living the same with my company.
>
> > > > On 3 déc, 04:59, Gmail User 217 wrote:
>
> > > > > Crazy in deed. I know Google is going after business to switch to
> > > > > Google Mail instead of Lotus and Exchange. The web interface is great
> > > > > which is one of the best selling point but it doesn't doRichtext
> > > > >signatureor html signatures. Every business has a brand which has to
> > > > > be maintained so I can't emphasize how important it is for the web
Marshall Baer
Jan 14, 2010, 8:11:13 AM1/14/10
to Suggest a Labs feature
There are "gadgets" that will allow for HTML (rich formatting)
signature in gmail.
I won't name them here, as this is a google sponsored forum and they
are not made by google.
But if you use google to do a search for "HTML Signature in Gmail" or
"Gmail Signature - Greasemonkey" you will get alot of results.
A little head up though, 95% of the ways to apply html to gmail is
going to require the use of firefox, hopeful.
I'm currently trying to port the FF extensions to Google Chrome.
Although having the ability to construct HTML/BB Coded signatures in
Gmail would be the ideal thing and make Gmail the utopia of email.
Hopefully it will be made possible soon.
On Jan 8, 7:30 am, ben.blanded wrote:
> I too agree. I often advise my clients to use gmail for many of it's
> features, but lacking rich formatting on thesignaturereally lets it
signature in gmail.
I won't name them here, as this is a google sponsored forum and they
are not made by google.
But if you use google to do a search for "HTML Signature in Gmail" or
"Gmail Signature - Greasemonkey" you will get alot of results.
A little head up though, 95% of the ways to apply html to gmail is
going to require the use of firefox, hopeful.
I'm currently trying to port the FF extensions to Google Chrome.
Although having the ability to construct HTML/BB Coded signatures in
Gmail would be the ideal thing and make Gmail the utopia of email.
Hopefully it will be made possible soon.
On Jan 8, 7:30 am, ben.blanded wrote:
> I too agree. I often advise my clients to use gmail for many of it's
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages