Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Latest Denier Argument from alt.global-warming
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  3 messages - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post will appear after it is approved by moderators
Roger Coppock  
View profile
 More options Mar 24, 9:49 pm
From: Roger Coppock <rcopp...@adnc.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Mar 24 2008 9:49 pm
Subject: Latest Denier Argument from alt.global-warming
Please see download the PDF file,
"CO2 greenhouse effect.pdf", at:

http://www.sendspace.com/file/lrw29h


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Eric Swanson  
View profile
 More options Mar 25, 1:02 pm
From: Eric Swanson <e_swan...@skybest.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Mar 25 2008 1:02 pm
Subject: Re: Latest Denier Argument from alt.global-warming
Nice to see that the Russians have discovered convection in the
Troposphere.  I wonder how long it will take them to learn about the
emission/absorption properties of gases?   For example, the outgoing
energy absorbed by CO2 is then re-radiated in all directions,  that is
to say, downwards as well as upwards.  More CO2 results in more
downward radiation, a fact which their reference to black body
emissions and Stefan-Boltzmann glosses over completely.  Their
analysis also completely ignores the Stratosphere!!

There's other errors as well, such as their insistence that the solar
constant be divided by 2 instead of by 4 to compute the Earth's
outgoing energy per unit area, which they claim is necessary since the
axis is tilted.  That claim ignores the fact that the atmosphere and
oceans move considerable quantities of energy toward the polar
regions, which compensates for the fact that there is no solar energy
at the poles during the respective winter months.

E. S.
---------------------------------------------------------------


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Roger Coppock  
View profile
 More options Mar 25, 11:06 pm
From: Roger Coppock <rcopp...@adnc.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 20:06:54 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Mar 25 2008 11:06 pm
Subject: Re: Latest Denier Argument from alt.global-warming
Yes Eric.  There are many problems here.
So many, everyone can have his or her own.
The problem I first saw was that they
gloss over the wind speeds necessary for
their convection.  (Top of page 5.)
Also, the paper ignores observed changes
in the lapse rate.  (Middle of page 5.)

Yet, this is certain to become part of
"Cee-OH-Too" pseudo science, like the
'You can't average global temperatures.'
myth.

On Mar 25, 10:02 am, Eric Swanson <e_swan...@skybest.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google