Issue 52 in gitsharp: Consider porting http server-side support from jgit

0 views
Skip to first unread message

gits...@googlecode.com

unread,
Jan 24, 2010, 9:46:27 AM1/24/10
to gits...@googlegroups.com
Status: New
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium

New issue 52 by emeric.fermas: Consider porting http server-side support
from jgit
http://code.google.com/p/gitsharp/issues/detail?id=52

JGit commits a0019e483d34d56f81bad0d102483fcf9db70a29,
ae971b3f24e9d1a4587ca2c07d314084e800d8e3 and
bd655146a45f5636faa7dab73457146384f982a3 provide JGit with server-side http
abilities.

Should GitSharp propose those as well ?

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings

gits...@googlecode.com

unread,
Jan 24, 2010, 9:59:52 AM1/24/10
to gits...@googlegroups.com

Comment #1 on issue 52 by emeric.fermas: Consider porting http server-side

Commits b06adf571f43bc14af3a91e0d287fecada18e8a0,
cca6789fbfdd2b1e14a42963ed4faaf416841d3c and
10a339161e9a7f30a52e1ea14850cf0016fe3b1f
would have to be considered as well.

gits...@googlecode.com

unread,
Jan 24, 2010, 10:47:50 AM1/24/10
to gits...@googlegroups.com
Updates:
Status: Accepted

Comment #2 on issue 52 by meinrad.recheis: Consider porting http

I'd vote for it. it's the best option for using gitsharp as peer to peer
content
distribution system

gits...@googlecode.com

unread,
Mar 21, 2010, 9:37:54 AM3/21/10
to gits...@googlegroups.com

Comment #3 on issue 52 by meinrad.recheis: Consider porting http

hmm, I doubt we can port the java servlet framework based implementation of
jgit.

-- henon

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages