evalTerm error

[Shafqat Virk]

While compiling a lexicon, I get the following error, What is wrong in there? 

generating PMCFG 

+ a1_A 1 (1,1)

+ a_N 1 (1,1)

+ a_d__Adv 1 (1,1)

+ a_ok_A 1 (1,1)

+ a_one_A 1 (1,1)

+ a_road_N 1 (1,1)

---------

--------

accentual_A 1 (1,1)

+ accentuate_V 1evalTerm ("दे" + ("जोर" ++ "दिया"))

I have the following linearization for the accentuage_V. 

lin accentuate_V = mkV "जोर देना" ;

it appears in many of them, so can't keep going by commenting it.

/BR

[Aarne Ranta]

"Just" a missing case in partial evaluation - a deep but simple bug, in other words. Now fixed in darcs. 

Thanks for pointing this out. It's incredible that the bug hasn't shown up before!

  Aarne.

[Shafqat Virk]

Thanks, its working now. Another thing while downloading GF from darcs with the following command

darcs get --partial --set-scripts-executable http://code.haskell.org/gf/

--partial parameter is not working, it gives unrecognized parameter error.

BR

[Thomas Hallgren]

"darcs get --partial" was replaced with "darcs get --lazy" when darcs 2.0.0 was released in April 2008.

(Also, if you already have a copy of GF, you can use "darcs pull" to get the latest updates instead of getting a new copy with "darcs get"...)

Thomas H

[christina]

I have a (maybe unrelated) problem: I want to access the string of a CN, something like this: 

    WhatAbout c = { s = variants { "was ist mit " + c.s ! Strong ! Pl ! Acc ; ... } };

Where Strong, Pl and Acc are from ResGer, and c is linearized as a CN, which was constructed using mkCN : N -> CN. 

When compiling, I get: 

- compiling /home/QueryGer.gf... evalTerm ("mit" + Class_0.s ! Strong ! Pl ! Acc) 

What does it mean? And maybe it's not the right way to extract the string? 

When I do the same thing for English, i.e.:

     WhatAbout c = { s = variants { "what about " + c.s ! Pl ! Nom; ... } };

I get a conflict (ConstructorsEng.mkNP, ResEng.mkNP) and the same reaction: evalTerm ("about" + Class_0.s ! Pl ! Nom)

Best regards,

Christina 

[Krasimir Angelov]

If you use ++ instead of + then it should compile. You cannot glue
strings from runtime variables.


2012/6/27 christina <f06...@gmail.com>:

[christina]

Ok, that was a stupid mistake. Thanks! 

(Maybe I should stop programming in Java ;)