network library" <gevent@googlegroups.com>
Received: by 10.50.169.33 with SMTP id ab1mr7276121igc.1.1332228509519;
        Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:28:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: gevent@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.231.56.140 with SMTP id y12ls332577ibg.9.gmail; Tue, 20 Mar
 2012 00:28:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.150.72 with SMTP id z8mr7840559icv.2.1332228506621;
        Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.150.72 with SMTP id z8mr7840557icv.2.1332228506600;
        Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <elff...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-iy0-f171.google.com (mail-iy0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ko2si190461igc.2.2012.03.20.00.28.26
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of elff...@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.171 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.210.171;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of elff...@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=elff...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-iy0-f171.google.com with SMTP id j38so18936402iad.16
        for <gevent@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=rnse1HrrOs78TNqu0Tw2YcTHJLj0Qw7cCLq+S2hdDeA=;
        b=EGe4zRQ6U9mNZUprsWaB2EKh+fpHYXBIu36VuBmqElAAH7UNgTWH92my/iZMyGaIxm
         DmJAtbdNUddNiEXY3rFcmI75cd00IEXdLJsv2y9PKLD7FKR8KeMiCNJdFL9JlMKIN9n5
         UPCSnMbdHsqHdQiWxscTGCpLqw1oesePzHokmZAXQonKB0C25uGTbeXP89EyXsX1d3nj
         TARjCa7TcES/EDkw9NwC65GwokttOYzzDL8/EN4Sc8sYR9sT+ZkynwaMCuiZLNbhXvO7
         MGV4ZyGszyn4WVsmdf7ePYoFz7s+zzuxSEjLY/uBi5PPmsQlauVSGu2hZk83pXEeJQvv
         H2dg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.149.168 with SMTP id ub8mr8056991igb.46.1332228506526; Tue,
 20 Mar 2012 00:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.43.134.9 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAFtEh-dAk6Py6viqKfjuhpgA55SL7n=n6skm+FJZD-9ooG=...@mail.gmail.com>
References: <9596893.934.1332148680792.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynlt17>
	<8980111.3698.1332192590169.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbij6>
	<CAFtEh-dAk6Py6viqKfjuhpgA55SL7n=n6skm+FJZD-9ooG=...@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:28:26 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+t=BX5_9jMf+HtrOC9fPyHZTEOOjrL+OF7zbgQTqtgiQ+W...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gevent] Re: Gevent and PyPy
From: Vasile Ermicioi <elff...@gmail.com>
To: gevent@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f234a57e4257304bba79e5b

--e89a8f234a57e4257304bba79e5b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

>
> at the moment PyPy is 5x faster than the CPython. That makes me "crave"
> for a combination pypy+gevent


I think greenlet module of pypy is not jit-able, that is, it may be slower
than with cpython

--e89a8f234a57e4257304bba79e5b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;=
margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color=
:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><span style>at =
the moment PyPy is 5x faster than the CPython. That makes me &quot;crave&qu=
ot; for a combination pypy+gevent</span></blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>I think greenlet module of pypy is not jit-able, that i=
s, it may be slower than with cpython=A0</div>

--e89a8f234a57e4257304bba79e5b--