The benchmark tested an echo like scenario and compared Erlang, Java (Webbit),Go, Node.js and Python (gevent + ws4py). The Python version of the test seems to be the least favourable.
>> The Python version
>> of the test seems to be the least favourable.
> Sure, how python can compete with compilers and JIT-enabled
> staticaly-typed languages? :)
Personally I'm already thrilled that it stays in the same order of magnitude.
I would like to see how ruby-eventmachine compares to gevent.
Does anybody knows some benchmarks comparing them ? (not necessarily
on websockets)
Go, Java, Erlang are probably not limited to a single core like node/python?
gunicorn with many gevent workers would fare much better I think - and be a
more realistic deployment option for anyone serious about these sort of
workloads under Python.
And there are options [1] in C++ using fibers which would be interesting to see
- I'd imagine there is a possibility some of these could be much faster than
Erlang.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 04:49:53AM -0700, Allard wrote:
> I haven't delved in to the whys an interesting observation:
> https://github.com/ericmoritz/wsdemo/blob/master/results.md > The benchmark tested an echo like scenario and compared Erlang, Java
> (Webbit),Go, Node.js and Python (gevent + ws4py). The Python version of
> the test seems to be the least favourable.
> It may get some comments on Hacker News as well.
> http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4105317 > Cheers,
> Allard
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Matt Billenstein <m...@vazor.com> wrote:
> Go, Java, Erlang are probably not limited to a single core like
> node/python?
> gunicorn with many gevent workers would fare much better I think - and be a
> more realistic deployment option for anyone serious about these sort of
> workloads under Python.
> And there are options [1] in C++ using fibers which would be interesting
> to see
> - I'd imagine there is a possibility some of these could be much faster
> than
> Erlang.
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 04:49:53AM -0700, Allard wrote:
> > I haven't delved in to the whys an interesting observation:
> > https://github.com/ericmoritz/wsdemo/blob/master/results.md > > The benchmark tested an echo like scenario and compared Erlang, Java
> > (Webbit),Go, Node.js and Python (gevent + ws4py). The Python version
> of
> > the test seems to be the least favourable.
> > It may get some comments on Hacker News as well.
> > http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4105317 > > Cheers,
> > Allard
Agree that it would have been good to see ruby's eventmachine in here and a C++ example. Using multiple workers with Gunicorn might have been more fair too. I am wondering what the hot spots are in the code. If it's even ws4py or if it's somewhere else...
On Wednesday, 13 June 2012 14:59:55 UTC-4, Jeff Lindsay wrote:
> I feel very guilty as the original author of the ws4py's gevent modules. I > never got around to optimizing or really stabilizing it. :(
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Matt Billenstein wrote:
>> Go, Java, Erlang are probably not limited to a single core like >> node/python?
>> gunicorn with many gevent workers would fare much better I think - and be >> a >> more realistic deployment option for anyone serious about these sort of >> workloads under Python.
>> And there are options [1] in C++ using fibers which would be interesting >> to see >> - I'd imagine there is a possibility some of these could be much faster >> than >> Erlang.
>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 04:49:53AM -0700, Allard wrote: >> > I haven't delved in to the whys an interesting observation: >> > https://github.com/ericmoritz/wsdemo/blob/master/results.md >> > The benchmark tested an echo like scenario and compared Erlang, Java >> > (Webbit),Go, Node.js and Python (gevent + ws4py). The Python version >> of >> > the test seems to be the least favourable. >> > It may get some comments on Hacker News as well. >> > http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4105317 >> > Cheers, >> > Allard
