You cannot post messages because only members can post, and you are not currently a member.
Description:
The mailinglist is intended for discussions and questions concerning the use of the General Estuarine Transport Model (GETM - www.getm.eu)
|
|
|
domain size specification
|
| |
Hi,
I am setting up a parallel run with GETM 2.2 and it is failing here:
init_time
Time step: 1.50000000000000 seconds
Time format: 2
Start: 2007-12-01 00:00:00
Stop: 2007-12-01 01:00:00... more »
|
|
|
(MPI) Process communication in GETM
|
| |
Hello,
are there any documentations which explain the pattern of process
communication in GETM? Presently I'm trying to understand it by
reading the code step by step, but this don't get me anywhere.
It would be very helpful for my detailed analysis.
Thanks in advance!
Sandra
|
|
|
Please take care
|
| |
Dear all,
as Karsten already mentioned several times, please always start a new thread for a new discussion. Replying to a mail you got from getm-users and simply changing the subject does *not* work!!!
Please have a look at [link] . You will see that the discussion started with the subject "Particle tracking... more »
|
|
|
unknown error message
|
| |
Hi GETM experts,
running my setup on a super computer in runtype=1 I get the following error after less than 1 minute simulation time:
getm: posixio.c:207: px_pgout: Assertion `*posp == ((off_t)(-1)) || *posp == lseek(nciop->fd, 0, 1)' failed.
However, nothing is written in the *stderr files and hence I cannot find the problem.... more »
|
|
|
IMPORTANT change in the devel version
|
| |
Hi all,
I just committed a necessary code change to the devel version regarding the definition of land in GETM.
Due to a missing initialisation until now land was defined by all areas with non-positive bathymetries. Of course this completely neglected the flooding of mudflat areas initially being dry. NOW with the new commit... more »
|
|
|
Red Hat vs Ububtu
|
| |
Hi,
I would like to know whether there is any difference between Red Hat and
Ubuntu, when it comes to compiling the GETM.
Which one has less trouble ?
I am a new user for GETM and would like to hear from experts.
Thanks
Thisara
|
|
|
Open boundaries
|
| |
Hi
Does GETM have a radiation scheme for open boundaries that takes in 3D
velocity fields instead of just depth averaged (as Flather does)?
The aim is to do a nested domain with a one way coupling to a larger 3D
domain.
Thanks,
tiago
This email and any attachments are intended for the named recipient only. Its unauthorised use, distribution, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted.... more »
|
|
|
Sylt test case/real estuary case crash
|
| |
Dear Getm users
I have compiled Gotm4.0.0 and Getm2.0.0 in my virtual linux (64 bit)
using IFORT and all test cases except Sylt runs fine. The real case
that I’m building is very similar to Sylt test case, that’s why I need
to get Sylt to work.
The compiling goes fine with Sylt and the model runs on single... more »
|
|
|
Particle tracking - vertical adaptive grid
|
| |
Dear GETM users, I have two questions: 1) is the particle tracking module already implemented in GETM? If so, how does it work? 2) Can I already make use of the vertical adaptive grid? Thanks a lot! adriana
|
|
|
GOTM, GETM, FABM - VMware virtual machine
|
| |
Hello - and sorry for cross posting. On the different mailing lists we quite often experience that people have problems getting all the pre-requisites in place in order to work with GOTM, GETM and FABM. In order to provide an easier way I've created a VMware virtual machine that contains everything needed to compile and run the standard GOTM and... more »
|
|
|
