Ocean Fertilization policy on stage at the United Nations General
Assembly
Issue: Negative language on ocean fertilization potentially being
adopted by the UN General Assembly
Background: The recent meeting of the UN General Assembly 63rd
Session (Sept 23-29 New York) discussed the issue of ocean
fertilization in the context of the annual UNGA resolution on oceans
affairs. EU delegations have pushed for language that would endorse
the resolution from the Convention on Biological Diversity pertaining
to ocean fertilization, and for deletion of language in last year’s
resolution that “encourage[d] States to support the further study and
enhance understanding of ocean iron fertilization.” See UN General
Assembly resolution 62/215, available here:
http://www.imo.org/includes/blastData.asp/doc_id=10158/INF-4-Add-1.pdf
Adopted last spring with little or no advance policy work or input
from the scientific community, the CBD’s decision on ocean
fertilization recommended that States place unreasonable restrictions
on the research of ocean fertilization. It may be found here:
http://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-09/cop-09-dec-16-en.pdf
Immediately after the CBD resolution was published, an ad hoc
consultative body established by the Intergovernmental Oceanographic
Commission issued a response criticizing these restrictions and asking
for clarification by CBD. This may be found here:
http://www.ioc-unesco.org/index.php?option=com_oe&task=viewDocumentRecord&docID=2002,
and is also reproduced below.
Adoption of language endorsing the CBD’s restriction on ocean
fertilization research would lend credence to that decision even as it
has become clear since the decision that (a) the decision was poorly
considered as matter of science; and (b) new publications strongly
support additional research, rather than unreasonable restrictions on
OIF research [Boyd et al., 2007; Buesseler et al., 2008; Lampitt et
al., 2008; Smetacek et al, 2008].
As resolution 62/215 also notes, the London Convention and London
Protocol are the proper UN bodies charged with developing an effective
regulatory and policy framework around ocean fertilization. The
Convention on Biological Diversity also acknowledges the authority of
the LC/LP on this issue, yet still makes statements that would
unreasonable restrict research. Resolution 62/215 should remain the
final statement on ocean fertilization policy.
As this language has been referred back to national delegations, there
is still time for modification before final adoption.
*******
Statement by IOC’s ad hoc Consultative Group on the CBD Resolution
(IOC/INF – 1247):
III. ADDENDUM (June 14, 2008): Response to the statement of the
Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity on
Ocean Fertilization Activities (30 May 2008)
The Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) ad hoc
Consultative Group on Ocean Fertilization is concerned that the
statement on ocean fertilization activities issued by the Conference
of the Parties to the Convention on Biodiversity in Bonn on 30 May
2008 places unnecessary and undue restriction on legitimate scientific
activities.
The statement reads, in part, “[The Conference of the Parties of the
Convention on Biodiversity (COP of the CBD)] … urges other
Governments, in accordance with the precautionary approach, to ensure
that ocean fertilization activities do not take place until there is
an adequate scientific basis on which to justify such activities,
including assessing associated risks, and a global transparent and
effective control and regulatory mechanism is in place for these
activities; with the exception of small scale research studies within
coastal waters.”
The IOC ad hoc Consultative Group on Ocean Fertilization notes that:
(1) The COP of the CBD recognizes “the ongoing scientific and legal
analysis [of ocean fertilization] occurring under the auspices of the
London Convention (1972) and the 1996 London Protocol.”
(2) The CBD proposes that “ocean fertilization activities do not take
place until there is an adequate scientific basis on which to justify
such activities, …with the exception of small scale scientific
research studies within coastal waters.” The restriction of
experiments to coastal waters appears to be a new, arbitrary, and
counterproductive limitation. The most useful ocean fertilization
experiments to date have been performed in open ocean environments, as
this is where marine productivity is most commonly limited by
micronutrients. There is no scientific basis for limiting such
experiments to coastal environments.
(3) There are good scientific reasons to do larger experiments,
including diminishing dilution near the center of the experimental
area and obtaining better data relating to vertical transport
processes. “Small scale” is a relative term. A circle 200 km in
diameter would cover less than one ten-thousandth of the ocean.
(4) We are concerned about the phrase in the CBD statement “global
transparent and effective control and regulatory mechanism … for these
activities”. We assume that “these activities” refers to ocean
fertilization activities for the purpose of introducing additional
carbon dioxide into the ocean, as distinct from purposes such as
legitimate scientific investigation. It would be helpful if this
phrase were clarified to make this important distinction evident
(5) Preservation of biodiversity in marine systems may require good
scientific information from manipulative experiments in the open
ocean. A careful science-based “assessment of associated risks”
depends on knowledge that could be gained by further experimentation.
(6) It is essential for sound and unbiased scientific advice to be
available to intergovernmental deliberations on the issue of ocean
fertilization both to protect the marine environment and to ensure
that marine scientific research is not unnecessarily hindered. The IOC
should continue to provide scientific advice to the London Convention
Scientific Group, as well as other international or intergovernmental
deliberations, as requested.
Boyd, P. W., et al. (2007), Mesoscale Iron Enrichment Experiments
1993-2005: Synthesis and Future Directions, Science, 315(5812),
612-617.
Buesseler, K. O., et al. (2008), ENVIRONMENT: Ocean Iron
Fertilization--Moving Forward in a Sea of Uncertainty, Science,
319(5860), 162.
Lampitt, R. S., et al. (2008), Ocean Fertilisation: a potential means
of geo-engineering?, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society
A, 366(1882), 3919-3945.