EM code allocation for Open8 MCU
KIRK_HAYS
binutils/include/elf/common.h) for the "Open8 8-bit RISC soft processor core"
(documented at
http://opencores.org/project,open8_urisc
).
Request that the value be called "EM_OPEN8", if possible.
Kindest,
Kirk I. Hays
(Above message also sent to regi...@sco.com)
Michael Eager
> I would like to request an EM "e_machine" code allocation (as used in
> binutils/include/elf/common.h) for the "Open8 8-bit RISC soft processor
> core"
> (documented at
>
> http://opencores.org/project,open8_urisc
>
> ).
>
> Request that the value be called "EM_OPEN8", if possible.
Send this request to regi...@sco.com.
--
Michael Eager ea...@eagercon.com
1960 Park Blvd., Palo Alto, CA 94306 650-325-8077
KIRK_HAYS
("mailbox unavailable"), and a message that:
>A message that you sent has not yet been delivered to one or more of
>its recipients after 27 hours.
>
>The message has not yet been delivered to the following addresses:
>
> <regi...@sco.com>
>
>SMTP error from remote server after transfer of mail text:
>host a.mx.sco.com[132.147.130.11]:
>450
The return email gives a procedure to follow, and notes that attempts
at delivery will continue.
This seems a problem. Does anyone know who is monitoring that email
box?
Kirk I Hays
On Mar 7, 10:33 am, Michael Eager <ea...@eagercon.com> wrote:
> KIRK_HAYS wrote:
> > I would like to request an EM "e_machine" code allocation (as used in
> > binutils/include/elf/common.h) for the "Open8 8-bit RISC soft processor
> > core"
> > (documented at
>
> >http://opencores.org/project,open8_urisc
>
> > ).
>
> > Request that the value be called "EM_OPEN8", if possible.
>
Cary Coutant
> ("mailbox unavailable"), and a message that:
>
>>A message that you sent has not yet been delivered to one or more of
>>its recipients after 27 hours.
>>
>>The message has not yet been delivered to the following addresses:
>>
>> <regi...@sco.com>
>>
>>SMTP error from remote server after transfer of mail text:
>>host a.mx.sco.com[132.147.130.11]:
>>450
>
> The return email gives a procedure to follow, and notes that attempts
> at delivery will continue.
>
> This seems a problem. Does anyone know who is monitoring that email
> box?
I just forwarded your message directly to the guy who used to be
behind that alias, and got a bounce back. Looks like he's not there
anymore, and I have serious doubts that there's anyone left at SCO who
would be interested in maintaining this registry (is there anyone left
at SCO at all?).
If nothing turns up from SCO on this, I suppose we could use this
mailing list as the de facto registry. The rate of change seems pretty
low.
-cary
Joseph S. Myers
> I just forwarded your message directly to the guy who used to be
> behind that alias, and got a bounce back. Looks like he's not there
> anymore, and I have serious doubts that there's anyone left at SCO who
> would be interested in maintaining this registry (is there anyone left
> at SCO at all?).
Note that as of November 2009 it was Jonathan Schilling <j...@sco.com>, not
Dave Prosser any more.
It's possible the rights to the gABI were acquired along with other rights
by someone in the course of SCO's bankruptcy, though whether anyone
acquiring those rights (and possibly the x86 and MIPS psABIs along with
them) has an actual interest in the rights and the registry is another
matter.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
Stephen Kilbane
mean "a response from a real person", not an SMTP OK - for my request
for EM_SHARC, on the 7th March.
steve
Michael Eager
> It's possible the rights to the gABI were acquired along with other rights
> by someone in the course of SCO's bankruptcy, though whether anyone
> acquiring those rights (and possibly the x86 and MIPS psABIs along with
> them) has an actual interest in the rights and the registry is another
> matter.
Some time ago, the Free Standards Group approached SCO
about transferring copyright to the gABI to them. SCO
was not receptive to the idea.
KIRK_HAYS
forthcoming that recently,
I'm going to wait a while longer, and see if it's merely email
congestion.
Kirk Hays
On Mar 8, 10:52 pm, Stephen Kilbane <st...@whitecrow.demon.co.uk>
wrote:
KIRK_HAYS
I've received a response from the current maintainer of the gABI list
at SCO.
Kirk
KIRK_HAYS
I note this morning that it appears the "latest" version of the online
page for the gABI
has been updated since I looked at it - the e_machine table has been
updated with
EM_ARC_COMPACT2, value 195, "Synopsys ARCompact V2".
What value was assigned for EM_SHARC?
Kirk