Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Generic System V Application Binary Interface
Home
+ new post
Pages
Files
About this group
Join this group
AVR32 Elf machine number
Options
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
   3 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post will appear after it is approved by moderators
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Bradley Smith  
View profile  
 More options May 6, 12:07 pm
From: Bradley Smith <b...@brad-smith.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:07:54 +0100
Local: Wed, May 6 2009 12:07 pm
Subject: AVR32 Elf machine number
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

Hi,

I'm just enquiring as to whether the AVR32 architecture has an official
elf machine number? I know currently 0x18ad is being used, but it seems
unlikely that this is an official number? If not, what are the chances of
getting this as the official number? Or would a new lower number need to
be obtained? Thanks.

Regards,
Bradley Smith

--
Bradley Smith                                     b...@brad-smith.co.uk
Debian GNU/Linux Developer                         bradsm...@debian.org
GPG: 0xC718D347       D201 7274 2FE1 A92A C45C EFAB 8F70 629A C718 D347

  signature.asc
< 1K Download

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dave Prosser  
View profile  
 More options May 6, 12:48 pm
From: Dave Prosser <d...@sco.com>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 12:48:09 -0400
Local: Wed, May 6 2009 12:48 pm
Subject: Re: AVR32 Elf machine number
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

Bradley Smith wrote:
> I'm just enquiring as to whether the AVR32 architecture has an official
> elf machine number? I know currently 0x18ad is being used, but it seems
> unlikely that this is an official number? If not, what are the chances of
> getting this as the official number? Or would a new lower number need to
> be obtained? Thanks.

There's an EM_AVR registered with (decimal) value 83
for the "Atmel AVR 8-bit microcontroller", but I doubt
it's the same as the AVR32 you're asking about.

Generally, when a new EM_* entry is registered, the
next value (most recent + 1) is assigned.  Given that
all registered values are still below 200, I'd expect
that a new EM_AVR32 entry would be the same, and not
be (decimal) 6317.

Would you anticipate an issue with recompiling with
a different value than what you're currently using?

--
Dave Prosser  d...@sco.com  (973)261-1407  The SCO Group, Florham Park, NJ
  SCO is a leading provider of UNIX-based solutions and mobile services.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bradley Smith  
View profile  
 More options May 6, 4:43 pm
From: Bradley Smith <b...@brad-smith.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 21:43:45 +0100
Local: Wed, May 6 2009 4:43 pm
Subject: Re: AVR32 Elf machine number
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

On Wed, 06 May 2009 12:48:09 -0400

Dave Prosser <d...@sco.com> wrote:
> There's an EM_AVR registered with (decimal) value 83
> for the "Atmel AVR 8-bit microcontroller", but I doubt
> it's the same as the AVR32 you're asking about.

Yes, that is something else.

> Generally, when a new EM_* entry is registered, the
> next value (most recent + 1) is assigned.  Given that
> all registered values are still below 200, I'd expect
> that a new EM_AVR32 entry would be the same, and not
> be (decimal) 6317.

This was my thinking also.

> Would you anticipate an issue with recompiling with
> a different value than what you're currently using?

For me, no, just a little extra work. (Coming from the point of view of a
glibc and debian port), but for Atmel I suspect this will cause a great
deal of problems. So I shall leave this with them.

Regards,
Bradley Smith

--
Bradley Smith                                     b...@brad-smith.co.uk
Debian GNU/Linux Developer                         bradsm...@debian.org
GPG: 0xC718D347       D201 7274 2FE1 A92A C45C EFAB 8F70 629A C718 D347

  signature.asc
< 1K Download

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google