Today when I analyzed a C# application (source code size above 20
mb).I am getting an exception as shown below
[INFO] [11:05:44.212] Sensor
com.hello2morrow.sonarplugin.SonargraphSensor@11ae15a done: 370 ms
[INFO] [11:05:44.212] Sensor CpdSensor...
[INFO] [11:05:44.212] PmdEngine is used
[INFO] [11:05:45.952] Sensor CpdSensor done: 1740 ms
[INFO] [11:05:45.952] Sensor
org.sonar.plugins.csharp.gendarme.GendarmeSensor@10e0623...
[INFO] [11:05:45.962] Gendarme executable not found: 'C:\Program Files
\gendarme-2.10-bin\gendarme.exe'. The embedded version (2.10) will be
used instead.
[INFO] [11:05:47.246]
[INFO] [11:05:47.246] An uncaught exception occured. Please fill a bug
report at https://bugzilla.novell.com/ [INFO] [11:05:47.246] Stack trace: System.ArgumentOutOfRangeException:
Specified argument was out of the range of valid values.
[INFO] [11:05:47.246] at
Mono.Collections.Generic.Collection`1.get_Item(Int32 index)
[INFO] [11:05:47.246] at
Gendarme.Framework.Symbols.ExtractFirst(MethodDefinition method)
[INFO] [11:05:47.246] at
Gendarme.Framework.Symbols.ExtractFirst(TypeDefinition type)
[INFO] [11:05:47.246] at
Gendarme.Framework.Symbols.GetSource(Defect defect)
[INFO] [11:05:47.246] at Gendarme.Framework.Defect.get_Source()
[INFO] [11:05:47.246] at
Gendarme.XmlResultWriter.CreateElement(Defect defect)
[INFO] [11:05:47.246] at Gendarme.XmlResultWriter.CreateDefects()
[INFO] [11:05:47.246] at Gendarme.XmlResultWriter.Write()
[INFO] [11:05:47.246] at Gendarme.ResultWriter.Report()
[INFO] [11:05:47.246] at Gendarme.ConsoleRunner.Report()
[INFO] [11:05:47.246] at Gendarme.ConsoleRunner.Execute(String[]
args)
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Can not execute Sonar
Embedded error: Gendarme execution failed.
Gendarme analysis failed: execution was interrupted by a non-handled
exception. This is likely a bug inside Gendarme and should be reported
on Novell's bugzilla (http://bugzilla.novell.com) or on the mailing-
list.
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] For more information, run Maven with the -e switch
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 59 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Fri Dec 30 11:05:47 IST 2011
[INFO] Final Memory: 21M/62M
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am using sonar 2.12
I tried with maven and as well as with simple java runner
When I searched for similar exception in web I could n’t able find
valid reason for this issue.
I have exactly the same exception. And the problem has something to
relation with COM library connection. I just turned off Gendarme from
sonar build. I'll try to investigate the problem if I build Gandarme.
On Jan 2, 7:50 am, vishnu <vishnu.vis2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Today when I analyzed a C# application (source code size above 20
> mb).I am getting an exception as shown below
> [INFO] [11:05:44.212] Sensor
> com.hello2morrow.sonarplugin.SonargraphSensor@11ae15a done: 370 ms
> [INFO] [11:05:44.212] Sensor CpdSensor...
> [INFO] [11:05:44.212] PmdEngine is used
> [INFO] [11:05:45.952] Sensor CpdSensor done: 1740 ms
> [INFO] [11:05:45.952] Sensor
> org.sonar.plugins.csharp.gendarme.GendarmeSensor@10e0623...
> [INFO] [11:05:45.962] Gendarme executable not found: 'C:\Program Files
> \gendarme-2.10-bin\gendarme.exe'. The embedded version (2.10) will be
> used instead.
> [INFO] [11:05:47.246]
> [INFO] [11:05:47.246] An uncaught exception occured. Please fill a bug
> report athttps://bugzilla.novell.com/ > [INFO] [11:05:47.246] Stack trace: System.ArgumentOutOfRangeException:
> Specified argument was out of the range of valid values.
> [INFO] [11:05:47.246] at
> Mono.Collections.Generic.Collection`1.get_Item(Int32 index)
> [INFO] [11:05:47.246] at
> Gendarme.Framework.Symbols.ExtractFirst(MethodDefinition method)
> [INFO] [11:05:47.246] at
> Gendarme.Framework.Symbols.ExtractFirst(TypeDefinition type)
> [INFO] [11:05:47.246] at
> Gendarme.Framework.Symbols.GetSource(Defect defect)
> [INFO] [11:05:47.246] at Gendarme.Framework.Defect.get_Source()
> [INFO] [11:05:47.246] at
> Gendarme.XmlResultWriter.CreateElement(Defect defect)
> [INFO] [11:05:47.246] at Gendarme.XmlResultWriter.CreateDefects()
> [INFO] [11:05:47.246] at Gendarme.XmlResultWriter.Write()
> [INFO] [11:05:47.246] at Gendarme.ResultWriter.Report()
> [INFO] [11:05:47.246] at Gendarme.ConsoleRunner.Report()
> [INFO] [11:05:47.246] at Gendarme.ConsoleRunner.Execute(String[]
> args)
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Can not executeSonar
> Embedded error: Gendarme execution failed.
> Gendarme analysis failed: execution was interrupted by a non-handled
> exception. This is likely a bug inside Gendarme and should be reported
> on Novell's bugzilla (http://bugzilla.novell.com) or on the mailing-
> list.
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] For more information, run Maven with the -e switch
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Total time: 59 seconds
> [INFO] Finished at: Fri Dec 30 11:05:47 IST 2011
> [INFO] Final Memory: 21M/62M
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> I am usingsonar2.12
> I tried with maven and as well as with simple java runner
> When I searched for similar exception in web I could n’t able find
> valid reason for this issue.
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 4:50 AM, vishnu <vishnu.vis2...@gmail.com> wrote: > [INFO] [11:05:47.246] An uncaught exception occured. Please fill a bug > report at https://bugzilla.novell.com/ > [INFO] [11:05:47.246] Stack trace: System.ArgumentOutOfRangeException: > Specified argument was out of the range of valid values. > [INFO] [11:05:47.246] at > Mono.Collections.Generic.Collection`1.get_Item(Int32 index) > [INFO] [11:05:47.246] at > Gendarme.Framework.Symbols.ExtractFirst(MethodDefinition method) > [INFO] [11:05:47.246] at > Gendarme.Framework.Symbols.ExtractFirst(TypeDefinition type) > [INFO] [11:05:47.246] at > Gendarme.Framework.Symbols.GetSource(Defect defect) > [INFO] [11:05:47.246] at Gendarme.Framework.Defect.get_Source() > [INFO] [11:05:47.246] at
This stack trace seems to indicate that you have a method with the HasBody flag, but which doesn't have any Instruction.
On Monday, February 13, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Jb Evain wrote: > Hey,
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 4:50 AM, vishnu <vishnu.vis2...@gmail.com (mailto:vishnu.vis2...@gmail.com)> wrote: > > [INFO] [11:05:47.246] An uncaught exception occured. Please fill a bug > > report at https://bugzilla.novell.com/ > > [INFO] [11:05:47.246] Stack trace: System.ArgumentOutOfRangeException: > > Specified argument was out of the range of valid values. > > [INFO] [11:05:47.246] at > > Mono.Collections.Generic.Collection`1.get_Item(Int32 index) > > [INFO] [11:05:47.246] at > > Gendarme.Framework.Symbols.ExtractFirst(MethodDefinition method) > > [INFO] [11:05:47.246] at > > Gendarme.Framework.Symbols.ExtractFirst(TypeDefinition type) > > [INFO] [11:05:47.246] at > > Gendarme.Framework.Symbols.GetSource(Defect defect) > > [INFO] [11:05:47.246] at Gendarme.Framework.Defect.get_Source() > > [INFO] [11:05:47.246] at
> This stack trace seems to indicate that you have a method with the > HasBody flag, but which doesn't have any Instruction.
> Could you verify that this assumption is true?
> I'll fix gendarme to not crash on this anyway.
> Jb
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Gendarme" group. > To post to this group, send email to gendarme@googlegroups.com (mailto:gendarme@googlegroups.com). > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to gendarme+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com (mailto:gendarme+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com). > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gendarme?hl=en.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Alik Kurdyukov <akurdyu...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm not sure I understand what's HasBody flag for methods. How can I check > the assumption?
You can run on your assembly a piece of code using Cecil like:
var module = ModuleDefinition.ReadModule("MyAssembly.dll"); foreach (var method in module.GetTypes().SelectMany(t => t.Methods).Where(m => m.HasBody && m.Body.Instructions.Count == 0)) { Console.WriteLine ("Method with empty body: {0}", method);
}
And you'll have the names of actual methods with empty bodies.
On Monday, February 13, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Jb Evain wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Alik Kurdyukov <akurdyu...@gmail.com (mailto:akurdyu...@gmail.com)> wrote: > > I'm not sure I understand what's HasBody flag for methods. How can I check > > the assumption?
> You can run on your assembly a piece of code using Cecil like:
> And you'll have the names of actual methods with empty bodies.
> Jb
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Gendarme" group. > To post to this group, send email to gendarme@googlegroups.com (mailto:gendarme@googlegroups.com). > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to gendarme+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com (mailto:gendarme+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com). > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gendarme?hl=en.
They emit managed methods which claim to be managed but are actually implemented by the runtime. Not that they care a lot.
I committed a fix to gendarme (1fbb7ea90bbb96d2d28f9567ec7dee8dc735cfc7), you can either build gendarme yourself or have the sonar guys cherry-pick this fix.
> And you'll have the names of actual methods with empty bodies.
> Jb
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Gendarme" group. > To post to this group, send email to gendarme@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > gendarme+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/gendarme?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Gendarme" group. > To post to this group, send email to gendarme@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > gendarme+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/gendarme?hl=en.
> They emit managed methods which claim to be managed but are actually > implemented by the runtime. Not that they care a lot.
> I committed a fix to gendarme > (1fbb7ea90bbb96d2d28f9567ec7dee8dc735cfc7), you can either build > gendarme yourself or have the sonar guys cherry-pick this fix.
> Jb
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Alik Kurdyukov <akurdyu...@gmail.com (mailto:akurdyu...@gmail.com)> wrote: > > Thank you for code sample. For my assembly it gives:
> > Method with empty body: System.Void > > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2Connection::_VtblGap1_1() > > Method with empty body: System.Void > > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2Connection::_VtblGap2_5() > > Method with empty body: System.Void > > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2Connection::_VtblGap3_2() > > Method with empty body: System.Void > > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2Connection::_VtblGap4_2() > > Method with empty body: System.Void > > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2TableSet::_VtblGap1_4() > > Method with empty body: System.Void > > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2TableSet::_VtblGap2_5() > > Method with empty body: System.Void > > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2DataStreamEvents_Event::_VtblGap1_2() > > Method with empty body: System.Void > > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2DataStreamEvents_Event::_VtblGap2_4() > > Method with empty body: System.Void > > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2BLMessage::_VtblGap1_3() > > Method with empty body: System.Void > > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2BLMessage::_VtblGap2_3() > > Method with empty body: System.Void > > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2DataStreamEvents::_VtblGap1_1() > > Method with empty body: System.Void > > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2DataStreamEvents::_VtblGap2_2()
> > BTW, I can give you binaries for P2ClientGateMTA assembly. Can it be of any > > help?
> > -- > > Best regards, > > Alik Kurdyukov
> > On Monday, February 13, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Jb Evain wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Alik Kurdyukov <akurdyu...@gmail.com (mailto:akurdyu...@gmail.com)> > > wrote:
> > I'm not sure I understand what's HasBody flag for methods. How can I check > > the assumption?
> > You can run on your assembly a piece of code using Cecil like:
> > And you'll have the names of actual methods with empty bodies.
> > Jb
> > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Gendarme" group. > > To post to this group, send email to gendarme@googlegroups.com (mailto:gendarme@googlegroups.com). > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > gendarme+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com (mailto:gendarme+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com). > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/gendarme?hl=en.
> > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Gendarme" group. > > To post to this group, send email to gendarme@googlegroups.com (mailto:gendarme@googlegroups.com). > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > gendarme+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com (mailto:gendarme+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com). > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/gendarme?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Gendarme" group. > To post to this group, send email to gendarme@googlegroups.com (mailto:gendarme@googlegroups.com). > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to gendarme+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com (mailto:gendarme+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com). > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gendarme?hl=en.
Gendarme official releases occurs at the same time as Mono releases. The beta cycle for 2.11 should start soon - but we're a few months away from a stable 2.12.
> They emit managed methods which claim to be managed but are actually > implemented by the runtime. Not that they care a lot.
> I committed a fix to gendarme > (1fbb7ea90bbb96d2d28f9567ec7dee8dc735cfc7), you can either build > gendarme yourself or have the sonar guys cherry-pick this fix.
> Jb
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Alik Kurdyukov <akurdyu...@gmail.com> > wrote:
> Thank you for code sample. For my assembly it gives:
> Method with empty body: System.Void > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2Connection::_VtblGap1_1() > Method with empty body: System.Void > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2Connection::_VtblGap2_5() > Method with empty body: System.Void > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2Connection::_VtblGap3_2() > Method with empty body: System.Void > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2Connection::_VtblGap4_2() > Method with empty body: System.Void > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2TableSet::_VtblGap1_4() > Method with empty body: System.Void > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2TableSet::_VtblGap2_5() > Method with empty body: System.Void > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2DataStreamEvents_Event::_VtblGap1_2() > Method with empty body: System.Void > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2DataStreamEvents_Event::_VtblGap2_4() > Method with empty body: System.Void > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2BLMessage::_VtblGap1_3() > Method with empty body: System.Void > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2BLMessage::_VtblGap2_3() > Method with empty body: System.Void > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2DataStreamEvents::_VtblGap1_1() > Method with empty body: System.Void > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2DataStreamEvents::_VtblGap2_2()
> BTW, I can give you binaries for P2ClientGateMTA assembly. Can it be of any > help?
> -- > Best regards, > Alik Kurdyukov
> On Monday, February 13, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Jb Evain wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Alik Kurdyukov <akurdyu...@gmail.com> > wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand what's HasBody flag for methods. How can I check > the assumption?
> You can run on your assembly a piece of code using Cecil like:
> And you'll have the names of actual methods with empty bodies.
> Jb
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Gendarme" group. > To post to this group, send email to gendarme@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > gendarme+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/gendarme?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Gendarme" group. > To post to this group, send email to gendarme@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > gendarme+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/gendarme?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Gendarme" group. > To post to this group, send email to gendarme@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > gendarme+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/gendarme?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Gendarme" group. > To post to this group, send email to gendarme@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > gendarme+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/gendarme?hl=en.
I am running into similar problems like Alik posted earlier. I downloaded the new 2.11 version of gendarme (gendarme-2.11-snapshot-20110305-win32-setup), but the problem is still there. Wondering if your hot fix has been included into new 2.11 version release.
BTW, I am totally new to using sonar .NET plugin, can you point me to where to get your a fix to gendarme (1fbb7ea90bbb96d2d28f9567ec7dee8dc735cfc7)?
> They emit managed methods which claim to be managed but are actually > implemented by the runtime. Not that they care a lot.
> I committed a fix to gendarme > (1fbb7ea90bbb96d2d28f9567ec7dee8dc735cfc7), you can either build > gendarme yourself or have the sonar guys cherry-pick this fix.
> Jb
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Alik Kurdyukov <akurdyu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Thank you for code sample. For my assembly it gives:
> > Method with empty body: System.Void > > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2Connection::_VtblGap1_1() > > Method with empty body: System.Void > > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2Connection::_VtblGap2_5() > > Method with empty body: System.Void > > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2Connection::_VtblGap3_2() > > Method with empty body: System.Void > > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2Connection::_VtblGap4_2() > > Method with empty body: System.Void > > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2TableSet::_VtblGap1_4() > > Method with empty body: System.Void > > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2TableSet::_VtblGap2_5() > > Method with empty body: System.Void > > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2DataStreamEvents_Event::_VtblGap1_2() > > Method with empty body: System.Void > > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2DataStreamEvents_Event::_VtblGap2_4() > > Method with empty body: System.Void > > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2BLMessage::_VtblGap1_3() > > Method with empty body: System.Void > > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2BLMessage::_VtblGap2_3() > > Method with empty body: System.Void > > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2DataStreamEvents::_VtblGap1_1() > > Method with empty body: System.Void > > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2DataStreamEvents::_VtblGap2_2()
> > BTW, I can give you binaries for P2ClientGateMTA assembly. Can it be of > any > > help?
> > -- > > Best regards, > > Alik Kurdyukov
> > On Monday, February 13, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Jb Evain wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Alik Kurdyukov <akurdyu...@gmail.com> > > wrote:
> > I'm not sure I understand what's HasBody flag for methods. How can I > check > > the assumption?
> > You can run on your assembly a piece of code using Cecil like:
> > And you'll have the names of actual methods with empty bodies.
> > Jb
> > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Gendarme" group. > > To post to this group, send email to gendarme@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > gendarme+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/gendarme?hl=en.
> > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Gendarme" group. > > To post to this group, send email to gendarme@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > gendarme+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/gendarme?hl=en.
On Wednesday, 23 May 2012 17:14:52 UTC+1, Ty wrote:
> Jb,
> I am running into similar problems like Alik posted earlier. I downloaded > the new 2.11 version of gendarme > (gendarme-2.11-snapshot-20110305-win32-setup), but the problem is still > there. Wondering if your hot fix has been included into new 2.11 version > release.
> BTW, I am totally new to using sonar .NET plugin, can you point me to > where to get your a fix to gendarme > (1fbb7ea90bbb96d2d28f9567ec7dee8dc735cfc7)?
> Thanks a lot for your help.
> Ty
> On Monday, February 13, 2012 10:23:45 AM UTC-6, Jb Evain wrote:
>> They emit managed methods which claim to be managed but are actually >> implemented by the runtime. Not that they care a lot.
>> I committed a fix to gendarme >> (1fbb7ea90bbb96d2d28f9567ec7dee8dc735cfc7), you can either build >> gendarme yourself or have the sonar guys cherry-pick this fix.
>> Jb
>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Alik Kurdyukov <akurdyu...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Thank you for code sample. For my assembly it gives:
>> > Method with empty body: System.Void >> > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2Connection::_VtblGap1_1() >> > Method with empty body: System.Void >> > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2Connection::_VtblGap2_5() >> > Method with empty body: System.Void >> > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2Connection::_VtblGap3_2() >> > Method with empty body: System.Void >> > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2Connection::_VtblGap4_2() >> > Method with empty body: System.Void >> > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2TableSet::_VtblGap1_4() >> > Method with empty body: System.Void >> > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2TableSet::_VtblGap2_5() >> > Method with empty body: System.Void >> > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2DataStreamEvents_Event::_VtblGap1_2() >> > Method with empty body: System.Void >> > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2DataStreamEvents_Event::_VtblGap2_4() >> > Method with empty body: System.Void >> > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2BLMessage::_VtblGap1_3() >> > Method with empty body: System.Void >> > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2BLMessage::_VtblGap2_3() >> > Method with empty body: System.Void >> > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2DataStreamEvents::_VtblGap1_1() >> > Method with empty body: System.Void >> > P2ClientGateMTA.IP2DataStreamEvents::_VtblGap2_2()
>> > BTW, I can give you binaries for P2ClientGateMTA assembly. Can it be of >> any >> > help?
>> > -- >> > Best regards, >> > Alik Kurdyukov
>> > On Monday, February 13, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Jb Evain wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Alik Kurdyukov <akurdyu...@gmail.com> >> > wrote:
>> > I'm not sure I understand what's HasBody flag for methods. How can I >> check >> > the assumption?
>> > You can run on your assembly a piece of code using Cecil like:
>> > And you'll have the names of actual methods with empty bodies.
>> > Jb
>> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups >> > "Gendarme" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to gendarme@googlegroups.com. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > gendarme+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> > For more options, visit this group at >> > http://groups.google.com/group/gendarme?hl=en.
>> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups >> > "Gendarme" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to gendarme@googlegroups.com. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > gendarme+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> > For more options, visit this group at >> > http://groups.google.com/group/gendarme?hl=en.