Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Agenda for tomorrow's meeting
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
smantix  
View profile  
 More options Oct 29 2009, 9:05 pm
From: smantix <jheff...@mindtool-usa.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Oct 29 2009 9:05 pm
Subject: Re: Agenda for tomorrow's meeting
Never one to refuse a soapbox / platform / pulpit, I regret that I
might not be able to attend. My daughter needs a ride to the airport.
Until Wednesday night, I thought she needed the ride Thursday morning,
but once again Dad was wrong: it's Friday. It's early, so I'll try to
get back for book club. But no promises.

I'm nearly finished with Martyn Amos' _Genesys Machines_, a book that
deserves much wider readership. When we last met, I had just read
about Adelman's seminal work on using DNA to solve a Hamiltonian path
problem. I was enthusiastic about molecular computing's potential for
tackling NP-complete problems. Since then the book has covered a
historical turn. Genetic machines run into the same issues as silicon-
based machines when face with combinatorial explosion. The remainder
of the book explains where molecular computing has gone since the
early days and where it's going today.

On the machine learning front, I coded naive Bayes in Ruby, following
Segaran's examples in Python. I've been looking for a chance to rehone
my Ruby skills; this chapter was a good opportunity, because unlike
many of the others it did not rely on external libraries. To that
extent, it was a success. However, the focus on language may have been
too great a distraction; I still don't have good insights to the
calculations. ("The purpose of computing is insight, not numbers."
Hamming, I believe.) More work to do on that front...

See you tomorrow if I can.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.