I think the first step here would be first to say "thank you" for your
interest in what we're trying to do here, the second (and I think we
have a pretty good start here) is to get as many of the people who may
be interested in this on board as soon as possible. Next I think we
should discuss in detail, just what we would like this site to do/be
and come up with an appropriate name. GCWorship was suggested and I
think would be fitting. I was thinking GCSound, but that would limit
us to just people involved with sound. I agree it would be cool (and
less confusing) to have everyone under one roof, bands, sound techs,
etc. I know I'm repeating things that have already been discussed
somewhat, I just wanted to get everyone up to speed.
Thanks again everyone for your suggestions, keep them coming.
> Next I think we should discuss in detail, just what we would like > this site to do/be > and come up with an appropriate name. GCWorship was suggested and I > think would be fitting. I was thinking GCSound, but that would limit > us to just people involved with sound.
I'm not sure GCSound is too limiting. It actually has a cool ring too it. Sound can mean much more than sound systems, or even music :)
Worship, however, is too expansive for the topic of this blog, unless we start talking about things like prayer, reading, teaching, and service as well :)
I agree. I think we'd be better off keeping the forum limited. There
are thousands of resources devoted to the other things you mentioned.
GCSound does have a nice ring to it, I'd be interested to hear what
others think about it.
Ian
On Jan 3, 11:03 am, Matt Heerema <mheer...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Next I think we should discuss in detail, just what we would like
> > this site to do/be
> > and come up with an appropriate name. GCWorship was suggested and I
> > think would be fitting. I was thinking GCSound, but that would limit
> > us to just people involved with sound.
> I'm not sure GCSound is too limiting. It actually has a cool ring
> too it. Sound can mean much more than sound systems, or even music :)
> Worship, however, is too expansive for the topic of this blog, unless
> we start talking about things like prayer, reading, teaching, and
> service as well :)
> I agree. I think we'd be better off keeping the forum limited. There
> are thousands of resources devoted to the other things you mentioned.
> GCSound does have a nice ring to it, I'd be interested to hear what
> others think about it.
> Ian
> On Jan 3, 11:03 am, Matt Heerema <mheer...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jan 3, 2008, at 10:54 AM, Ian wrote:
> > > Next I think we should discuss in detail, just what we would like
> > > this site to do/be
> > > and come up with an appropriate name. GCWorship was suggested and I
> > > think would be fitting. I was thinking GCSound, but that would limit
> > > us to just people involved with sound.
> > I'm not sure GCSound is too limiting. It actually has a cool ring
> > too it. Sound can mean much more than sound systems, or even music :)
> > Worship, however, is too expansive for the topic of this blog, unless
> > we start talking about things like prayer, reading, teaching, and
> > service as well :)
I am still learning how to use the computer. Ive never even heard of
google groups and until recently never sent an email. Anyway im
totally on board with GCSound. i am fairly new with running the sound
board and i am looking forward to learning so much from all of this.
