I think Daniel's motion does constitute an amendment. I will
recognize it as such. Does anyone wish to second Daniel's approach?
If it is not seconded, we will proceed with the original motion. If
If Tony wishes to propose the amendment Don suggested, then I'll play
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Donald Dale Milne <dondmi...@att.net> wrote:
> Since there is already a motion on the floor regarding the document, and--
> it has been seconded, I believe we need to either amend that motion or vote
> on it before we can entertain a new motion on the same subject.
> By way of amendment, Tony mentioned on Main that he would amend to change
> - Don Milne
> On 4/23/2012 6:30 AM, Daniel wrote:
>> I move that we amend the MOTION as follows:
>> Alexandros Diamantidis<a...@hellug.gr> wrote:
>>> * Lionel English [2012-04-22 21:43]:
>>>> Everyone--there's a motion on the table to adopt the genre committee's
>>>> Also, be aware that either way we do it, there are a few follow ups
>>> I'd actually prefer to vote on adopting the document "as is", since the
San Diego, CA
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.