I thought that new digiplay site (
www.digiplay.info) with new
bibliography allows to add some kind of comments. At least I've made
this conclusion from the following line:
"Post comments to discuss the paper or alert fellow researchers to
other resources."
Perhaps this comments may serve something like annotation.
I've finished my work about gamestudies bibliography. Actually in the
process of writing it transformed "a little" - I managed to make
content-analysis only of references from ISI and Scopus (about 900
items). One of the results of this rather crude content-analysis was a
kind of "mapping" of computer-(video- digital-) games discourse in
"official" Academia, represented by ISI and Scopus citations. Although
there may be some problems with validity, but as a source of
bibliography and categorization of the topics, mostly related to
digital games it is quite applicable. Nothing revolutionary, but at
least opinion of someone from GAMESNETWORK listserv, that in the
beginning games interested "official" science mostly from perspectives
of health effects, violence and education, now has some quantitative
ground.