gac.physics.astronomy Google Group

PLANEIUM New theory on atom, is anti-matter the structure that holds all atoms together?

2013-02-11T18:11:23Z

This is a new theory by the infamous Sollog as to how atoms are formed.

Seems there's a cage that all atoms are structured within

He calls it PLANEIUM

Same guys theories on astro-physics and math have been discussed for around 20 years or so, stuff like titius-bodes being realigned to explain all solar system phenomena in our solar system, prime algorithm, etc.

astrométéorologie

2012-12-13T21:02:27Z

Bonjour
Je cherche à joindre les membres de SPACE dont parle Maxence Layet & Roland Wehrlen dans ElectroCulture et Énergies Libres
Je suis très intéressé par votre expérience et vos recherches sur ce domaine.
J'ai eu le plaisir de rencontrer Philipp FORRER chez lui dans l'Aude en Novembre et de vérifier que l'electro culture n'est pas un fantasme.

Re: solutions manual

2012-07-04T01:04:48Z

i want solution manuall for
Digital Design 3rd Edition by M. Morris Mano,Michael D. Ciletti

Aviation Weather Observation S H I T by B e l f o r t D i g i W X

2012-05-31T16:01:01Z

And now Belfort Instrument Company (dba DigiWx AWOS, Gamma
Scientific, UDT Instruments, Advanced Retro, RoadVista, KR
Acquisition Corporation) finds itself in United States Bankruptcy
Court as evidenced by:
[link]

Belfort Instrument Company is selling to a known terrorist country as

Request: The moon in 1991

2011-12-05T23:30:16Z

My aplogies if this be the wrong group for my question. I need to look
up the moonlight available at a given place in the past. The time in
question would be betweeen 2200-2330 hours UTC on February 2nd, 1991.
The location 48 degrees 43 minutes north by 66 degrees 57 minutes west.

At that time a small plane impacted a snow covered peak a few feet short

New theory for the formation of the solar system.

2010-12-07T01:04:25Z

Hi,
The sun energy source is not fusion. The sun and other stars are
heated by magnetic fields from the supermassive black hole at the
center of the Milky Way galaxy.
With this idea it is possible to trace the formation of the solar
system. The sun and stars formed separately. First the sun formed and

Re: Black hole evaporation

2010-11-25T18:49:24Z

Background
[link]

Re: Black hole evaporation

2010-11-25T18:19:32Z

Having read a few articles in the popular scientific press (namely,
New Scientist), I understand that black holes may "evaporate" by means
of Hawking radiation.
My question here is how would this manifest itself?
Okay, my reasoning here....
I imagine a neutron star being fed one particle at a time. Rather

Black hole evaporation

2010-11-25T16:14:46Z

Re: ï»¿â€‹ The static, immutable, immobile, changeless and choiceless cosmos.

2010-07-28T09:42:40Z

You(Painius) said Dr. Verlinde asserts that gravity doesn't exist and
that Rodrian “ seemed to agree with him by welcoming him to the club. ”.
I don't see where Verlinde claimed “Gravity doesn't exist”.
Who's Rodrian ? Apparently, WikiPedia doesn't know about him.
Verlinde prefers soft statistics over hard precision, it seems.

The static, immutable, immobile, changeless and choiceless cosmos.

2010-07-28T02:28:36Z

Re: ï»¿ SoÂ·called â€œrandomnessâ€ is just IGNORANCE, inadequate measurement.

2010-07-26T09:44:04Z

Gravity is primordial structure, eXergy; entropy eats it.
Besides you(Painius), who'd dare imagine it “doesn't exist” ?
Gravity is equal to all other forms of eXergy, combined;
if gravity doesn't exist, then neither does eXergy ?? the stuff of life.
The amount of eXergy/gravity we see to day is just fate;

So·called “randomness” is just IGNORANCE, inadequate measurement.

2010-07-20T21:36:30Z

No Brad, un·like you, I never said:
“ The binding force(s) of gravity is(are) randomness. ”.
I said:
So·called “randomness” is just IGNORANCE, inadequate measurement. <[link]>

"Every Day More Physicists Are Coming Closer To The Truth About Gravity / S D Rodrian"

2010-07-20T20:40:21Z

"Every Day More Physicists Are Coming Closer To The Truth About
Gravity / S D Rodrian"
Just because you're a dysfunctional Mormon doesn't give you the right
to hijack topics by others, that is unless you've converted to being
Jewish.
The binding force(s) of gravity is not “randomness” nor is it anything

So·called “randomness” is just IGNORANCE, inadequate measurement.

2010-07-20T18:50:16Z

No Brad, it's:
So·called “randomness” is just IGNORANCE, inadequate measurement. <[link]>

Every Day More Physicists Are Coming Closer To The Truth About Gravity / S D Rodrian

2010-07-20T18:05:08Z

So·called “randomness” is just IGNORANCE, inadequate measurement.

2010-07-20T17:50:38Z

No Brad, it's:
So·called “randomness” is just IGNORANCE, inadequate measurement. <[link]>

Every Day More Physicists Are Coming Closer To The Truth About Gravity / S D Rodrian

2010-07-20T17:46:27Z

"Every Day More Physicists Are Coming Closer To The Truth About
Gravity / S D Rodrian"

So·called “randomness” is just IGNORANCE, inadequate measurement.

2010-07-20T17:28:57Z

Gravity is primordial structure, eXergy; entropy eats it.
Besides you(Painius), who'd dare imagine it “doesn't exist” ?
Gravity is equal to all other forms of eXergy, combined;
if gravity doesn't exist, then neither does eXergy ―― the stuff of life.
The amount of eXergy/gravity we see to day is just fate;

Re: Every Day More Physicists Are Coming Closer To The Truth About Gravity / S D Rodrian

2010-07-13T12:12:41Z

Inertia and gravity the same stuff. Accelerating motion is equaL TO
BOTH Those are the big clues. All other forces are faces of gravity
Then we have G=EMC^2 Then we have my GUT that shows a 5th force is
needed to create universes. TreBert

Re: Every Day More Physicists Are Coming Closer To The Truth About Gravity / S D Rodrian

2010-07-13T07:56:04Z

I have been explaining the fact that
gravity is purely/only an effect of
thermodynamics since the turn of the
century! . . .
. . .
“We’ve known for a long time gravity doesn’t
exist,” Dr. Verlinde said, “It’s time to yell it.”
END QUOTE
Welcome to the club, Dr. Verlinde.
S D Rodrian

Every Day More Physicists Are Coming Closer To The Truth About Gravity / S D Rodrian

2010-07-13T04:37:33Z

I have been explaining the fact that
gravity is purely/only an effect of
thermodynamics since the turn of the
century! [Google: "sdrodrian" SEE:
[link] ] So
it is certainly gratifying to see that
some people are finally beginning
to wake up and slowly crawl... up to
the knowledge which is all already

solutions manual

2010-06-26T12:47:41Z

solutions for student team
solutions.for.stud...@hotmail. com
We're a team for providing solution manuals to help students in their
study.
We sell the books in a soft copy, PDF format.
We will find any book or solution manual for you.
Just email us:
solutions.for.stud...@hotmail. com
List of some books we have

Re: Yet Another SD Rodrian Prediction True: Gravity is NOT an attractive force between bodies

2010-06-17T19:38:38Z

On Jun 16, 7:20 am, bert
Dear Bert, read my post AND try
to understand it, --SDR
RE:
On Jun 16, 10:07 am, Uncle Al
<Uncle...@hate.spam.net> burst out
of his strait-jacket and began hollering:
If the universe is a black hole, and everything
in it is forever imploding away from where
the universe no longer is: How would YOU

Re: Yet Another SD Rodrian Prediction True: Gravity is NOT an attractive force between bodies

2010-06-16T11:20:46Z

In this spacetime it is just about imossible to go against Einstein's
GR It proves gravity is space concave curve. Magnetisim is a
particle exchange force. Both very different. Best to keep in mind
my Concave & Convex theory It answers hard questions and is Nobel
thinking TreBert

Yet Another SD Rodrian Prediction True: Gravity is NOT an attractive force between bodies

2010-06-16T04:30:18Z

Yet Another SD Rodrian Prediction True:
Gravity, as argued even by Einstein, is NOT
an attractive force between bodies.
EINSTEIN WAS RIGHT
- SPACE AND TIME BEND
Ninety years after he
expounded his famous theory,
a $700m NASA probe has
proved that the universe
behaves as he said. [read
the entire article below]

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

2010-01-05T23:05:35Z

ToYa All Fusion core can equal the compression force for 10 billion
years,but gravity all ways wins in the end.Sun changes(evolves),but
gravity is the same.Gravity creates fusion. Best keep that in mind
Bert

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

2009-11-30T02:02:59Z

I agree, there's more to the complex formation and logic of our known
universe than the extremely weak force of gravity.
Gravity seems more of a subsequent reaction rather than a primary
cause.
~ BG

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

2009-11-30T01:50:47Z

Still at this?
Stand in the center of 100,000 starving people and hold up a Big Mac. Everyone towards
the center will be pushing back, but they are outnumbered which will lead to you, and them,
getting crushed. So, yeah, that Mac's influence was pretty much equalized at the center, now,
wasn't it?

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

2009-11-30T01:08:59Z

On Nov 21, 12:29 am, "Angelo Campanella"
Sorry: The region (core) is one of the MOST/
THE HIGHEST pressure of all--My point, rather,
is that according to the laws of gravity THIS
SHOULD NOT BE. And yet it is. Did you miss this?
Well, if you can explain how the hydrogen
atoms are PRESSED closed enough together

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

2009-11-04T11:53:45Z

On Nov 1, 3:39 am, Tomm Carr
Thank God! I hate it when my conclusions
are flawed because of very complex reasons.
See: This is why there should be a law
against those TV programs that reveal how
the tricks of magicians like me are done.
That's in the other forces' work contract.
You're thinking of a bowling ball there, friend:

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

2009-10-30T07:45:44Z

You're not thinking straight:
I do not claim that the universe works
in any way differently from how we
know it works.
I do know that if gravity were producing
"the effects of gravity," then the universe
could NOT work the way we know it works
(from the way gravity should work if it were
to work according to its own laws).

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

2009-10-29T12:22:11Z

On Oct 29, 6:40 am, Frederick Williams <frederick.willia...@tesco.net >
wrote:
I refer you back to:
[link]
S D Rodrian
[link]
[link]
[link]
On Oct 26, 1:51 am, BradGuth

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

2009-10-29T11:40:02Z

No it won't. It will oscillate back and forth.

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

2009-10-27T05:08:41Z

I never said I wasn't a monkey myself:
[link]
SDR

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

2009-10-27T00:29:46Z

"Firefox can't find the server at physics.sdrodian.com"
We monkeys need something more than luck.
~ BG

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

2009-10-26T23:08:52Z

Can't you figure out how to set your line length to something
sensible?

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

2009-10-26T18:15:11Z

On Oct 26, 1:51 am, BradGuth
[link]
If the universe operated as described
by classical laws of gravity (e.g. via
your mythical graviton) then probably
the Sun would look like a big frozen
planet (along with every other star).
The "shell" might simply descend in

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

2009-10-26T06:51:45Z

Gravity Force Inside a Spherical Shell (is always zero)
[link]
So, how thick is the shell or gaseous outer wall of our sun?
~ BG

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

2009-10-26T03:06:11Z

On Oct 8, 11:37 pm, "Nightcrawler"
edu> wrote in messagenews:
MPG.2538809c369d2948989686
@news.giganews.com...
That misunderstanding is why I substituted
Superman for the ping-pong ball AND YET
so many monkeys [yes: here] continued to
misunderstand my simple little thought-
experiment that I despair of my fellow

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

2009-10-17T02:42:43Z

Ok, you can see the conclusion is wrong.
Can you see _why_ it's wrong?

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

2009-10-14T00:20:33Z

I am not dear. If I were
I could not continue typing.
You are in error.
SDR

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

2009-10-11T04:43:49Z

[snip]
[snip]
Imagine I mash a cannon ball into your skull.
Therefore you are dead, so STFU.

Re: Superman and The Sun Experiment / S D Rodrian

2009-10-10T05:25:17Z

<snip>
Once you figure out how gravity works, and how a star is created,
get back to us with a real question.
Here's a hint: You are leaving out around half of the mass when
you think of your mind game, as goofy as it is.

Superman and The Sun Experiment / S D Rodrian

2009-10-10T04:56:09Z

Obviously the ping-pong ball overwhelmed
the fragile minds of many of the posters
here (I only used it as strictly a focusing
device, but far far too many poor souls here
were simply dumbfounded by a ping-pong
ball inside the Sun and wrecked their brains
over how it was reacting in there). And
this in spite of my warning then that if they

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

2009-10-09T19:25:23Z

Correction noted, thusly making your explanation correct.

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

2009-10-09T18:07:09Z

The usual crap from a non scientist. How far the ball sinks into the Sun
depends entirely upon how its density compares with that of the Sun.

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

2009-10-09T05:47:57Z

In article <hameqk$94...@news.eternal-sep tember.org>,
Dirtyde...@dirtcheap.net says...>
Yes, the poster I responded to said exactly that. He said the
ping pong ball was immune to all forces except gravity.
"Buffeting" implies electromagnetic interactions.
That, too... :-)

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

2009-10-09T04:37:32Z

Of course, the OP did not state that the ping pong ball would
be immune to the density of the matter within the sun. So, the
ball would essentially just get buffeted around and most likely
would never even get close to the sun.
He's also in error in that he is presuming that the matter of the
sun will not press in and fill any voids that there are, and specifically

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

2009-10-09T04:06:01Z

In article <cd65d60c-2107-4f5e-b0b2-
caf220447...@p36g2000vbn.googl egroups.com>, a...@sdrodrian.com says...>
No. This is where you go wrong. It would *not* stop.

All the while it was approaching the center of the Sun, it would
continue to accelerate, though the rate of acceleration would
decline to 0 at the center. However, it would continue to

gac.physics.astronomy Google Group

PLANEIUM New theory on atom, is anti-matter the structure that holds all atoms together?

astrométéorologie

Re: solutions manual

Aviation Weather Observation S H I T by B e l f o r t D i g i W X

Request: The moon in 1991

New theory for the formation of the solar system.

Re: Black hole evaporation

Re: Black hole evaporation

Black hole evaporation

Re: ï»¿â€‹ The static, immutable, immobile, changeless and choiceless cosmos.

​ The static, immutable, immobile, changeless and choiceless cosmos.

Re: ï»¿ SoÂ·called â€œrandomnessâ€ is just IGNORANCE, inadequate measurement.

So·called “randomness” is just IGNORANCE, inadequate measurement.

"Every Day More Physicists Are Coming Closer To The Truth About Gravity / S D Rodrian"

So·called “randomness” is just IGNORANCE, inadequate measurement.

Every Day More Physicists Are Coming Closer To The Truth About Gravity / S D Rodrian

So·called “randomness” is just IGNORANCE, inadequate measurement.

Every Day More Physicists Are Coming Closer To The Truth About Gravity / S D Rodrian

So·called “randomness” is just IGNORANCE, inadequate measurement.

Re: Every Day More Physicists Are Coming Closer To The Truth About Gravity / S D Rodrian

Re: Every Day More Physicists Are Coming Closer To The Truth About Gravity / S D Rodrian

Every Day More Physicists Are Coming Closer To The Truth About Gravity / S D Rodrian

solutions manual

Re: Yet Another SD Rodrian Prediction True: Gravity is NOT an attractive force between bodies

Re: Yet Another SD Rodrian Prediction True: Gravity is NOT an attractive force between bodies

Yet Another SD Rodrian Prediction True: Gravity is NOT an attractive force between bodies

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

Re: Superman and The Sun Experiment / S D Rodrian

Superman and The Sun Experiment / S D Rodrian

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian

The static, immutable, immobile, changeless and choiceless cosmos.