http://www.stocktwits.com/stephanusR real-time signals
2 views
Skip to first unread message
backspace
Jun 7, 2011, 4:15:36 AM6/7/11
to futures trading
Track record at http://stocktwits.com/stephanusR is 55 winning trades
out of 60. This must be viewed in terms of my thread: ''
Falsifiability criteria for evaluating trading proficiency ''
http://groups.google.com/group/futures-trading/browse_frm/thread/2ecad27b1e1aa13b#
Latest trade was long signal on SP500 at 1285, now trading at 1292,
with draw-down of only 2 (1283). The small draw-down to gain indicates
that the trade wasn't a random gamble.
out of 60. This must be viewed in terms of my thread: ''
Falsifiability criteria for evaluating trading proficiency ''
http://groups.google.com/group/futures-trading/browse_frm/thread/2ecad27b1e1aa13b#
Latest trade was long signal on SP500 at 1285, now trading at 1292,
with draw-down of only 2 (1283). The small draw-down to gain indicates
that the trade wasn't a random gamble.
backspace
Jun 7, 2011, 4:18:04 AM6/7/11
to futures trading
http://stocktwits.com/stephanusR/message/3994205
On Jun 7, 10:15 am, backspace <stephan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Track record athttp://stocktwits.com/stephanusRis 55 winning trades
On Jun 7, 10:15 am, backspace <stephan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Track record athttp://stocktwits.com/stephanusRis 55 winning trades
> out of 60. This must be viewed in terms of my thread: ''
> Falsifiability criteria for evaluating trading proficiency ''
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/futures-trading/browse_frm/thread/2eca...
> Falsifiability criteria for evaluating trading proficiency ''
>
backspace
Jun 8, 2011, 2:47:02 PM6/8/11
to futures trading
On Jun 7, 10:18 am, backspace <stephan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://stocktwits.com/stephanusR/message/3994205
>
> On Jun 7, 10:15 am, backspace <stephan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > out of 60. This must be viewed in terms of my thread: ''
> > Falsifiability criteria for evaluating trading proficiency ''
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/futures-trading/browse_frm/thread/2eca...
>
> > Latest trade was long signal on SP500 at 1285, now trading at 1292,
> > with draw-down of only 2 (1283). The small draw-down to gain indicates
> > that the trade wasn't a random gamble.
Gave another winning SP500 trade at
> > Falsifiability criteria for evaluating trading proficiency ''
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/futures-trading/browse_frm/thread/2eca...
>
> > Latest trade was long signal on SP500 at 1285, now trading at 1292,
> > with draw-down of only 2 (1283). The small draw-down to gain indicates
> > that the trade wasn't a random gamble.
http://www.stocktwits.com/stephanusR
backspace
Jun 9, 2011, 2:49:27 PM6/9/11
to futures trading
> > > Track record athttp://stocktwits.com/stephanusRis55winning trades
http://stocktwits.com/stephanusR/message/4019034
'''...... $ES_F tr.62 long at market 1278 .......''''
http://stocktwits.com/stephanusR/message/4022520
''......$ES_F tr.62 peaked at 1285(+7), entry 1278, draw-down
1276(-2). Win 57 /loss 5 , total trades 62....'''
Takes the track record to 57 winning trades out of 62, which indicates
that the trades weren't due to random luck. Especially the small draw-
downs to gain is important. If the draw-downs in relation to gain are
to large then a winning trade is likely to be only random pot-shot.
> > > out of 60. This must be viewed in terms of my thread: ''
> > > Falsifiability criteria for evaluating trading proficiency ''
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/futures-trading/browse_frm/thread/2eca...
> > > Latest trade was long signal on SP500 at 1285, now trading at 1292,
> > > with draw-down of only 2 (1283). The small draw-down to gain indicates
> > > that the trade wasn't a random gamble.
> Gave another winning SP500 trade athttp://www.stocktwits.com/stephanusR
And yet another winning trade on SP500
> > > Falsifiability criteria for evaluating trading proficiency ''
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/futures-trading/browse_frm/thread/2eca...
> > > Latest trade was long signal on SP500 at 1285, now trading at 1292,
> > > with draw-down of only 2 (1283). The small draw-down to gain indicates
> > > that the trade wasn't a random gamble.
> Gave another winning SP500 trade athttp://www.stocktwits.com/stephanusR
http://stocktwits.com/stephanusR/message/4019034
'''...... $ES_F tr.62 long at market 1278 .......''''
http://stocktwits.com/stephanusR/message/4022520
''......$ES_F tr.62 peaked at 1285(+7), entry 1278, draw-down
1276(-2). Win 57 /loss 5 , total trades 62....'''
Takes the track record to 57 winning trades out of 62, which indicates
that the trades weren't due to random luck. Especially the small draw-
downs to gain is important. If the draw-downs in relation to gain are
to large then a winning trade is likely to be only random pot-shot.
backspace
Jun 10, 2011, 2:21:37 PM6/10/11
to futures trading
backspace
Jun 10, 2011, 2:23:44 PM6/10/11
to futures trading
stephanusR
EURUSD tr.65 Win 60 / Loss 5 . Or 60 winning trades out of 65.
Jun. 10 at 8:22 PM
backspace
Jun 16, 2011, 12:06:59 PM6/16/11
to futures trading
$ES_F tr.66 given yestrday, winning trade. draw-dwn -8 , peaked at
1268.75 +7. Track recrd 61win/5loss given rltime on stocktwits.
http://stocktwits.com/stephanusR/message/4081368
http://stocktwits.com/stephanusR/message/4081431
1268.75 +7. Track recrd 61win/5loss given rltime on stocktwits.
http://stocktwits.com/stephanusR/message/4081368
http://stocktwits.com/stephanusR/message/4081431
backspace
Jul 1, 2011, 5:59:00 AM7/1/11
to futures trading
http://chart.ly/a6i3rge
$EURUSD tr.67 enty at 43843, bottomed at 43771, 7 pip scalp and zero
drawdwn. win/loss 62/5
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages