I had heard that ESRI dropped out due to 'lack of resources' which may
have been a valid reason since they announced that they would join in
the shootout rather late in the game. On the other hand, Andrea and
Jeff said they ran their benchmark tests on weekends during the month
prior to FOSS4G, so maybe it is more of a comparison of how willing
open source vs. proprietary software developers are willing to donate
their free time.
Because next year's WMS shootout in Barcelona has already been
announced, I assume that ESRI will be able to allocate enough
'resources' to join in, if they are truly interested in doing so.
The Oracle vs. PostGIS results are interesting, but the difference may
have been partly due to the developers experience in configuring the
respective databases. During the presentation they didn't really
discuss how much effort was made in configuring the databases, or
whether they just used an out-of-the-box installation of the
databases.
Also I had heard that publishing benchmark results is in violation of
Oracle's end-user license, so does this mean that this was a one-time
test using the Oracle backend (or has Oracle changed their terms)?
- Tyler