The Atheists are such crybabies!
horne...@yahoo.com
way stopped at a Library. Its amazing that the lack of reaading
comprehension of my first post seems to be lacking from these atheists.
I am hanging out with my cousin PERIOD.. I will return to New York
SOON...
It also is strangte how it seems perfectly okay for Horn to publicly
attack my cousin, Jason Gastrich, John Weatherly and other such
christians publicly. But when he is threatened to be epxosed, the baby
cries all over. Darn can this David Horn guy take any of his own
medicine?
I bet he was one of the babies that I regularly beat up in High School
who always cried to the principle everytime I stepped on their shoes.
My cousin tells me of a punk that he also beat up allot when he was in
High School that did the same to him.
You guys are such babies!
Angelo
Andres64
Joshua Aaron
>...Its amazing that the lack of reaading comprehension of my first post seems to be lacking from these atheists.
What it is more amazing is to view your lack of spelling ability in
this post. What is reaading anyway?
Cary Kittrell
Hey, don't harrass the boy -- after all he just told us that
we atheists lack a lack of comprehension. Why look a compliment-
horse in the mouth?
-- cary
JPG
>
>I am hanging out with my cousin PERIOD..
I hope you'll be very happy together and have lots of six-fingered
children.
Mark K. Bilbo
Wolf, nobody believes you. Get it?
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection." [Jarvis DeBerry]
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
Mike Painter
> On 25 Aug 2006 13:55:01 -0700, horne...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Š 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> author
>> Me and my cousin are on our way to visit Golden Gate Park and on the
>
>
>
> If you wish to be taken seriously, you MIGHT want to start with
> correct English...
>
> Try "My cousin and I are on our way..."
>
> At the moment, you merely reflect the youth's national downhill slide
> into full-blown "me-first" ism.
>
>
>> way stopped at a Library. Its amazing that the lack of reaading
>> comprehension of my first post seems to be lacking from these
>> atheists.
>
> comprehension, but you START with a grammar "no-no", "me and my", and
> then "reaading".
>
> tsk tsk
>
> And -- by the way-- I don't mean to attack you. You seem like a nice
> fellow otherwise. But your poor grammar COULD hold you back in some /
> many situations. For one, if I were an employer you were interviewing
> with, I wouldn't hire you!
>
>>
>> I am hanging out with my cousin PERIOD.. I will return to New York
>> SOON...
>>
>> It also is strangte how it seems perfectly okay for Horn to publicly
>> attack my cousin, Jason Gastrich, John Weatherly and other such
>> christians publicly.
>
>
> In this paragraph, for instance, you BEGIN with the word "publicly"
> "It also is strangte how it seems perfectly okay for Horn to
>
> and then
>
> :-(
> you TERMINATE with "publicly".
>
> "...christians publicly."
>
> And you are supposed to capitalize "Christians". It's proper
> name/noun.
>
> But when he is threatened to be epxosed, the baby
>> cries all over. Darn can this David Horn guy take any of his own
>> medicine?
>
> belief that that merely indicates I am doing something positive.
>
> In short, I can handle it.
> But thanks for your concerns!
>
>>
>> I bet he was one of the babies that I regularly beat up in High
>> School
>
> to capitalize "High School". Say "that I regularly beat up in high
> school..."
>
>> who always cried to the principle everytime I stepped on their shoes.
>> My cousin tells me of a punk that he also beat up allot when he was
>> in High School that did the same to him.
>>
>>
>> You guys are such babies!
>
> "positive response." Wait til you think they're going to swing on
> you, and then respond with violence. (answer violence with violence)
>
Gosh Mr English, what are we going to do today, now that you are off your
meds again?
Bill M
<horne...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1156539301.7...@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
You theists sure have a fine intellect!???
Michael Gray
>Me and my cousin are on our way to visit Golden Gate Park and on the
>way stopped at a Library. Its amazing that the lack of reaading
>comprehension of my first post seems to be lacking from these atheists.
:
I'll be glad when school holidays are over.
Does your mummy know that you are using her computer, sonny?
Jos Flachs
free.christians,alt.atheism,alt.christnet.public,alt.bible,alt.religion.christian.baptist:
>x-no-archive: yes
>On 25 Aug 2006 14:11:25 -0700, "Joshua Aaron" <tennes...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
> © 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
>article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
>author
>For his lack of spelling and poor grammar, he makes some good points.
>
>Are you afraid to address the issues he raises?
What issues? It doesn't raise anything.
Gastric and you are pathetic cry babies. Both of you never answer any
serious question anyway. And you, my dear old liar, spam your
imbecilities in far too many groups.
Dave
Yahoo has confirmed that this address does not exist.
> Me and my cousin are on our way to visit Golden Gate Park
> and on the way stopped at a Library. Its amazing that the
> lack of reaading comprehension of my first post seems to
> be lacking from these atheists.
Of course, there's no "cousin." It's just Wolf, and there doesn't seem
to be a problem with reading comprehension by anyone reading what Wolf
has been trying to lie past us, here in these groups. The
interpretation seems to be fairly universal. Wolf is lying, and he's
throwing a vengeful temper tantrum. Why? Because he can't silence at
least one outlet of opposition to him, and he can't out-debate that
outlet, either.
> I am hanging out with my cousin PERIOD.. I will return to
> New York SOON...
Why does Wolf waste so much time with this part of the charade?
> It also is strangte how it seems perfectly okay for Horn to
> publicly attack my cousin, Jason Gastrich, John Weatherly
> and other such christians publicly.
Well, that's not strange, at all. None of the parties named are
Christians, for one thing. All of them try to tread upon, disrespect,
and defraud other people, all while perpetuating their form of fraud.
What's amusing is that Wolf, obviously fed up, has decided that he must
actually create other persons, as Gastrich did, create a fake Yahoo
address, as Gastrich did, and pretend to expose, as Gastrich did...by
*lying*, as Gastrich did. One lie after another, all to expose alleged
lies.
Such things are strange only in the minds of liars like John Wolf.
> But when he is threatened to be epxosed, the baby
> cries all over.
Wolf, of course, has threatened quite a bit, including exposure, and
not one bit of it has caused me to "cry." What I have done is exposed
*him* further, and every time he posts this way, he continues to expose
*himself* as a fraud.
> Darn can this David Horn guy take any of his own
> medicine?
As soon as Wolf shows that he has any facts on his side, he might
actually be able to at least legitimately claim that he can give out
"medicine." The problem is that he has no facts. He lies. I poke at
him and he lies some more. All this does is expose that he is a fraud.
> I bet he was one of the babies that I regularly beat up in High
> School who always cried to the principle everytime I stepped
> on their shoes. My cousin tells me of a punk that he also
> beat up allot when he was in High School that did the same
> to him.
So Wolf wants to pretend that "Angelo" was a high school bully. Well,
as usual, his bet would be lost. I was actually one of those who
regularly put in their respective places the bullies that would pick on
weaker kids.
> You guys are such babies!
Yep...we're "babies," while "Angelo" hides behind a fake Usenet name, a
fake email address, and fake, well, everything.
This is funny stuff!
Pastor Kutchie
Reaading: A reitreration of an absence of an absence of the sound a
bell makes. This tends to happen at two o'clock.
Dave
> Might I suggest that beating up those you don't like isn't exactly a
> "positive response." Wait til you think they're going to swing on
> you, and then respond with violence. (answer violence with violence)
Yep...that's just what Jesus sai...uh, wait...no, it isn't.
That Weatherly has weighed in on this thread has not escaped my notice,
but I have a special plan for him.
John Baker
>x-no-archive: yes
>On 25 Aug 2006 14:11:25 -0700, "Joshua Aaron" <tennes...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
> Š 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
>article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
>author
>For his lack of spelling and poor grammar, he makes some good points.
>
>Are you afraid to address the issues he raises?
What issues?
More lies, bullshit and insults from yet another smug Christer moron.
What's to address?
>
Tornado
<johnw<no>@yoo.how> wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
> On 25 Aug 2006 13:55:01 -0700, horne...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Š 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> author
> >Me and my cousin are on our way to visit Golden Gate Park and on the
>
>
> I'm saying this as nicely as I know how. Kindly do not take offense.
>
> If you wish to be taken seriously, you MIGHT want to start with
> correct English...
>
You, old love, should start with treatment for mental illness and what is
beginning to look like early onset dementia
You might follow it with a liberal basic education
The very idea of a looney in Seattle charity housing, whose practical
experience seems limited to internet porn and three stories about a dead
cat, a singing xmas tree, and how to defend yourself against armed attack
by shouting "Jesus Loves You" attempting to correct anyones English.......
Oh brother.
===============
nuff said
Tornado
<johnw<no>@yoo.how> wrote:
> if I were an employer you were interviewing
> with, I wouldn't hire you!
But you aren't and never will be -
Where you are right now (on welfare and in charity housing, is as high as
you are ever likely to get, the rest appears to be downhill for you)
So leave the rest to the big boys
+++++++++++++++
bob young
"john w
> x-no-archive: yes
> On 25 Aug 2006 14:11:25 -0700, "Joshua Aaron" <tennes...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> © 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> author
> For his lack of spelling and poor grammar, he makes some good points.
>
> Are you afraid to address the issues he raises?
I didn't see any,
only juvenile stupidity
Josh Miles
> Me and my cousin are on our way to visit Golden Gate Park and on the
> way stopped at a Library.
No need to capitalize the L, unless the library is actually called
"Library."
> Its amazing that the lack of reaading
> comprehension of my first post seems to be lacking from these atheists.
It would help if you started writing in English instead of Retardese.
Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
<snip>
> my cousin, Jason Gastrich,
Geez. Congenital assholes.
--
rb
Enkidu
@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
> Me and my cousin are on our way to visit Golden Gate Park and on the
> way stopped at a Library. Its amazing that the lack of reaading
> comprehension of my first post seems to be lacking from these atheists.
Given what you just wrote, I can understand why people have reading
comprehension problems when trying to parse your text.
> I am hanging out with my cousin PERIOD.. I will return to New York
> SOON...
Well, zip up before someone calls a cop.
--
Enkidu AA#2165
http://www.thoughts.leaddogs.org/
EAC Chaplain and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA
My dog was first in his class at Harvard Divinity School.
-- bumper sticker
NOs...@no.spam
>For one, if I were an employer you were interviewing
>with, I wouldn't hire you!
And who would hire YOU, weatherless?
Have you learned the diff between 'sew' and 'sow' yet?
NOs...@no.spam
>
>My "feces return fan" is still in working order.
bowels, bowels, bowels...............
NOs...@no.spam
>
>And I learned to behave and be quiet by the age of 10.
Too bad it never stuck with you.
Mark K. Bilbo
> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 08:19:06 +0700, Jos Flachs <xwcr...@ksc15.th.com>
> wrote:
> © 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> author
>>On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:02:28 -0700, john w <johnw<no>@yoo.how> annoyed
>>free.christians,alt.atheism,alt.christnet.public,alt.bible,alt.religion.christian.baptist:
>>
>>>x-no-archive: yes
>>>On 25 Aug 2006 14:11:25 -0700, "Joshua Aaron" <tennes...@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>> © 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
>>>article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
>>>author
>>>>horne...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>>...Its amazing that the lack of reaading comprehension of my first post seems to be lacking from these atheists.
>>>>
>>>>What it is more amazing is to view your lack of spelling ability in
>>>>this post. What is reaading anyway?
>>>
>>>
>>>For his lack of spelling and poor grammar, he makes some good points.
>>>
>>>Are you afraid to address the issues he raises?
>>What issues? It doesn't raise anything.
>
> You should admit that you "raise lots of issues", but you refuse
> challenges put to YOU!
> And I have repeatedly said that I don't waste MY time with "skeptics"
> and "atheists".
Any time you want to leave alt.atheism is fine with us...
Michael Gray
<gm...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
- Refer: <cYydnbUFl7VABW3Z...@megapath.net>
>On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 04:56:38 -0700, john w <johnw wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 08:19:06 +0700, Jos Flachs <xwcr...@ksc15.th.com>
>> wrote:
>> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
>> author
>>>On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:02:28 -0700, john w <johnw<no>@yoo.how> annoyed
>>>free.christians,alt.atheism,alt.christnet.public,alt.bible,alt.religion.christian.baptist:
>>>
>>>>x-no-archive: yes
>>>>On 25 Aug 2006 14:11:25 -0700, "Joshua Aaron" <tennes...@gmail.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
>>>>author
>>>>>horne...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>>>...Its amazing that the lack of reaading comprehension of my first post seems to be lacking from these atheists.
>>>>>
>>>>>What it is more amazing is to view your lack of spelling ability in
>>>>>this post. What is reaading anyway?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>For his lack of spelling and poor grammar, he makes some good points.
>>>>
>>>>Are you afraid to address the issues he raises?
>>>What issues? It doesn't raise anything.
>>
>> You should admit that you "raise lots of issues", but you refuse
>> challenges put to YOU!
>> And I have repeatedly said that I don't waste MY time with "skeptics"
>> and "atheists".
>
>Any time you want to leave alt.atheism is fine with us...
He chooses to spend his time with delusion morons and homicidal
maniacs.
None of this "thinking person" rubbish.
Michael Gray
- Refer: <cap0f2lvimmd6mb0t...@4ax.com>
>On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 05:00:06 -0700, john w <johnw<no>@yoo.how> wrote:
>
>>
>>And I learned to behave and be quiet by the age of 10.
>
>
>Too bad it never stuck with you.
They let him out of the detention centre when he was 11.
Jos Flachs
embarrassed free.christians,alt.atheism,alt.christnet.public,
alt.bible, alt.religion.christian.baptist:
>>>Are you afraid to address the issues he raises?
>>What issues? It doesn't raise anything.
Woopie here! Didn't dear old sjonnie tell us he wouldn't respond? How
often already?
>You should admit that you "raise lots of issues", but you refuse
>challenges put to YOU!
Such as, darling?
> And I have repeatedly said that I don't waste MY time with "skeptics"
>and "atheists".
Seems you sure do, darling.
> You are not open, so what's the point?
> You call that "running" and "refusing to reply."
You normally don't reply or answer any questions put to you, old
timer.
> I say and I say again that refusing to play your infantile games is
>not "running" or "refusing to reply".
>It's refusing to play your mind games.
>
>
>snipped the mindless accusations from a mental amoeba.
>
>As for "cross-posting", that's a LIE! I simply don't know where your
>feces came from, so I must send my response to EVERY group on your
>list!
>
>If you don't like my replies, keep your feces out of the Baptist
>group!
As soon as you dissapear from alt.atheism. Deal?
If you can't play with the big boys, stay with the bap-pissers.
>My "feces return fan" is still in working order.
Really? A new line in your porn writing business?
I really wonder how bap-pissers think about that one. A fellow
bap-pisser makes (well, tries to, at least) money by writing incest
porn. By his own admission, no less.
I'm willing to bet they don't approve of it, but are rather keen to
buy it anonymous in the adult bookshop.
Dave
Snip some of that "Christian 'love.'"
> As for "cross-posting", that's a LIE! I simply don't know where your
> feces came from, so I must send my response to EVERY group on your
> list!
Fffffaaaasssscccinating! So Weatherly isn't "cross-posting," he's
simply sending a response to "EVERY group."
"Crossposting is the act of posting a single copy of a message which is
addressed to multiple forums, newsgroups or topic areas." -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossposting
Of course, Weatherly *is* crossposting when he does that, and so there
is no lie.
But the thing that I find especially amusing is the bit about how
Weatherly "*must*" send his response to "EVERY group." Why *must*
Weatherly respond, at all?
> If you don't like my replies, keep your feces out of the Baptist
> group!
There's that love, again.
> My "feces generation fan" is still in working order.
I corrected the spelling.
Enkidu
news:sp32f21ctsm0ddrjc...@4ax.com:
>>Any time you want to leave alt.atheism is fine with us...
>
>
> I'm not in alt.atheism. I'm in alt.religion.christian.baptist.
>
> Any time you folk want to stop cross-posting to/and polluting the
> baptist group (and wasting my bandwidth) is fine with me.
>
>:-)
>
> You DO see how that works, don't you?
>
> (I was sure you would)
Forte Agent allows you to ignore posts cross posted to particular groups.
Use it, and never see another post to or from alt.atheism again.
--
Enkidu AA#2165
http://www.thoughts.leaddogs.org/
EAC Chaplain and ordained minister,
ULC, Modesto, CA
Now Playing:
I cannot see how a man of any large degree of humorous perception can
ever be religious -- unless he purposely shut the eyes of his mind & keep
them shut by force.
-- Mark Twain
Dave
> x-no-archive: yes
> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:54:21 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
[Snip]
> >Any time you want to leave alt.atheism is fine with us...
>
> I'm not in alt.atheism. I'm in alt.religion.christian.baptist.
>
> Any time you folk want to stop cross-posting to/and polluting the
> baptist group (and wasting my bandwidth) is fine with me.
>
> :-)
>
> You DO see how that works, don't you?
>
> (I was sure you would)
As already pointed out, this is hypocrisy on the part of Weatherly.
It's okay for him to invade other newsgroups, but it's not okay for
others to invade what he views as *his* newsgroup.
Of course, there's always the fact that no one is forcing Weatherly to
read or respond to newsgroup postings by anyone, but he does it, and
then hypocritically yammers at others.
Oh, and "archived."
Dave
> x-no-archive: yes
> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> author
> >
> >>
> >>And I learned to behave and be quiet by the age of 10.
> >
> >
> >Too bad it never stuck with you.
>
>
> Aren't you the one who makes irrelevant comments in thread after
> thread after thread, ALWAYS drawing attention aWAY from the topic and
> ONTO YOU?
>
> Yep! You're the one.
>
> We call you "the ORIGINAL attention WHORE!"
Now here's a candidate for PKB if I ever saw one.
Mark K. Bilbo
> x-no-archive: yes
> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:54:21 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
> I'm not in alt.atheism. I'm in alt.religion.christian.baptist.
>
> Any time you folk want to stop cross-posting to/and polluting the
> baptist group (and wasting my bandwidth) is fine with me.
You're the one who whined: "And I have repeatedly said that I don't waste
MY time with 'skeptics' and 'atheists'."
Were you lying?
Oh, by the way, John Wolf started the cross posting.
Mark K. Bilbo
> john w <johnw<no>@yoo.how> wrote in
> news:sp32f21ctsm0ddrjc...@4ax.com:
>
>>>Any time you want to leave alt.atheism is fine with us...
>>
>>
>> I'm not in alt.atheism. I'm in alt.religion.christian.baptist.
>>
>> Any time you folk want to stop cross-posting to/and polluting the
>> baptist group (and wasting my bandwidth) is fine with me.
>>
>>:-)
>>
>> You DO see how that works, don't you?
>>
>> (I was sure you would)
>
> Forte Agent allows you to ignore posts cross posted to particular groups.
> Use it, and never see another post to or from alt.atheism again.
>
He won't. He'd rather bitch about not bothering with us while posting into
alt.atheism...
NOs...@no.spam
Should'a kept hiom until he was at least fifty!!!!! :O)
Tornado
<johnw<no>@yoo.how> wrote:
> And I learned to behave and be quiet by the age of 10.
Are you dragging us back to the sexual assault story YET again?
I think we have heard enough of both that and your advice on masturbation
Maybe you could keep some of these things for a more appropriate victim
support forum
Damn it man you are sixty nearly!
Move on or get counselling
Tornado
<johnw<no>@yoo.how> wrote:
> And I have repeatedly said that I don't waste MY time with "skeptics"
> and "atheists".
No but you did tell us you hang round pedophiles in your building
Strange choice!
Michael Gray
wrote:
- Refer: <Capistrano-27...@192.168.0.2>
How about both?
The pathetic individual is a friggin' dangerous psychotic lunatic.
The sooner he is locked up, the better.
Sawp him for one the harmless pot-smokers that now fill US prisons,
and do the universe a favour.
Dave
> x-no-archive: yes
> © 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> author
> degree of intellect would understand.
Weatherly has never "explained" or "discussed" this with anyone.
However, since he's claiming that he has, he's free to provide a Google
link to a post that he's made in which he's done that. I wonder why he
can't do that...
Fact is that there is a difference between explaining and discussing
and the sort of whining and assertion-making that Weatherly makes.
> Which means you are beneath the moderate level of intelligence, and
> puts you somewhere in the IQ range of a houseplant.
Feel the love.
Of course, Weatherly--and everyone else--knows that I'm more than a
match, intellectually, for him. That's why he takes the route that he
does in these exchanges.
Weatherly is a hypocrite. It's quite clear from his behavior in this
regard, and I've been saving his comments due to time constraints.
Tuesday night, I'll start dealing with them. *All* of them.
Mark K. Bilbo
> On 26 Aug 2006 20:24:05 -0700, "Dave" <hor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> © 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> author
>>john w wrote:
>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:54:21 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
>>
>>[Snip]
>>
>>> >Any time you want to leave alt.atheism is fine with us...
>>>
>>> I'm not in alt.atheism. I'm in alt.religion.christian.baptist.
>>>
>>> Any time you folk want to stop cross-posting to/and polluting the
>>> baptist group (and wasting my bandwidth) is fine with me.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You DO see how that works, don't you?
>>>
>>> (I was sure you would)
>>
>>As already pointed out, this is hypocrisy on the part of Weatherly.
>>It's okay for him to invade other newsgroups, but it's not okay for
>>others to invade what he views as *his* newsgroup.
>>
>>Of course, there's always the fact that no one is forcing Weatherly to
>>read or respond to newsgroup postings by anyone, but he does it, and
>>then hypocritically yammers at others.
>
> I've discussed and explained this enough that anyone with a moderate
> degree of intellect would understand.
Oh horse pucky. You say you don't have anything to do with us but you
don't killfile the newsgroup. Which is possible in Agent.
Mark K. Bilbo
> x-no-archive: yes
> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:36:05 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
> I don't call a 2-line rebuke "a response."
>
>>
>>Oh, by the way, John Wolf started the cross posting.
>
> And there was this guy standing next to you holding a gun to your head
> DEMANDING that you respond!
>
> I know. Happens to me all the time!
Skippy, *you* are the one who said you don't have anything to do with us
yet here you are posting into alt.atheism. Why don't you set up a filter
to knock out anything xposted to this ng?
Because you don't mean what you say maybe?
Budikka666
> x-no-archive: yes
> On 25 Aug 2006 14:11:25 -0700, "Joshua Aaron" <tennes...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> © 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> author
> >horne...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >>...Its amazing that the lack of reaading comprehension of my first post seems to be lacking from these atheists.
> >
> >What it is more amazing is to view your lack of spelling ability in
> >this post. What is reaading anyway?
>
>
> For his lack of spelling and poor grammar, he makes some good points.
>
> Are you afraid to address the issues he raises?
What issues?!! If you have issues, lay them out here, support them,
and I'll take on both of you in a formal debate of them. Deal?
Budikka
Robibnikoff
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gm...@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
news:08GdnXSGbJy8JWzZ...@megapath.net...
No, because he's too stupid to figure out how to do it. Which, of course,
makes his constant bragging about his "education" and "high" IQ all the more
laughable.
Not to mention, he can't possibly pass up an opportunity to piss and moan
like the whiny little bitch he is.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
Atheist Bastard Extraordinaire
#1557
{Whösöever}
Robibnikoff wrote:
> No, because he's too stupid to figure out how to do it. Which, of course,
> makes his constant bragging about his "education" and "high" IQ all the more
> laughable.
> Not to mention, he can't possibly pass up an opportunity to piss and moan
> like the whiny little bitch he is.
What's "laughable" to me is that all of you who constantly rail on and
slam Weatherly for his many faults still haven't figured out that he's
likely severely mentally ill and his grandiose claims are possibly only
another symptom of his illness.
What you all see in the sport of trashing and attempting to hold
accountable an obviously delusional mental-case is beyond me.
Kate
wrote:
He sounds just like another part of the daily chorus of theists that
constantly dither on Alt.Atheist. If that many people are that
constantly nuts, they are apparently issuing lap tops to the mental
institutions and giving them easy buttons to post here.
Tornado
"Budikka666" <budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
> john w wrote:
> > x-no-archive: yes
> > On 25 Aug 2006 14:11:25 -0700, "Joshua Aaron" <tennes...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > =A9 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> > article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> > author
> > >horne...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > >>...Its amazing that the lack of reaading comprehension of my first post=
> seems to be lacking from these atheists.
> > >
> > >What it is more amazing is to view your lack of spelling ability in
> > >this post. What is reaading anyway?
> >
> >
> > For his lack of spelling and poor grammar, he makes some good points.
> >
> > Are you afraid to address the issues he raises?
>
> What issues?!! If you have issues, lay them out here, support them,
> and I'll take on both of you in a formal debate of them. Deal?
>
> Budikka
Angelo is John Wolf
Tornado
John's known aliases:
Name Address First used Notes
1 John Wolf jo...@Southcoast.net 23-Jan-96
2 JWolf6589 jwol...@aol.com 13-Aug-98
3 johnw...@yahoo.com johnw...@yahoo.com 07-July-01 Contributed
by a visitor to this page
4 John jo...@sdf.lonestar.org 15-Feb-02
5 Dude jo...@Southcoast.net 15-Mar-02
6 charlie charliet...@yahoo.com 15-Mar-02
7 diaper dirtydia...@mail.com 15-Mar-02
8 Kelli78909 kelli...@aol.com 15-Mar-02
9 Billy6589 bill...@aol.com 15-Mar-02
10 Mac User mac...@nospam.com 18-Jun-03
11 Joseinmexico Josein...@aol.com 03-Jul-03
12 Crucifyself03 crucif...@aol.comnojunk 10-Jul-03 Signed "Leo"
13 nospam jwol...@aol.com 11-Jul-03
14 Leo Davidson aka John W jo...@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG 23-Jul-03
15 OSXis_1987 OSXis...@yahoo.com 28-Jul-03 probably July 28-29 2003 only
16 Beach Boy thebea...@hotmail.com 22-Aug-03
17 Leo crucif...@aol.comnojunk 23-Aug-03
18 Spider Eyes spide...@palm.net 23-Aug-03
19 Greenmamba9999 greenma...@aol.com 11-Sep-03
20 Frank G greenma...@aol.com5268 14-Sep-03
21 Bible Man John bibl...@lycos.com 30-Sep-03
22 Cool dude cool...@aol.com 18-Oct-03 Someone else used this
address 1998-99
23 Bible joh...@simpsonca.edu 07-Dec-03
24 Satanrules9666 satanru...@aol.com 06-Apr-04
25 Leo Davidson leo.da...@lycos.com 08-Apr-04
26 Bill Nadar bill....@mamma.com 12-Apr-04
27 Ironfist5687 ironfi...@aol.com 15-Apr-04 Signed "Kurt," "Iron
Fist," "IronFist,"
"Kurt the Iron Fist," "Kur," & "John"
28 Leo Davidson leo_da...@mamma.com 20-Apr-04
29 Richard Steven W. rst...@army.com 21-Apr-04 Impersonating another user*
30 John Wolf joh...@simpsonca.edu 22-Apr-04
31 Richard Steven Walzed rst...@armorry.com 22-Apr-04 Impersonating
another user*
32 Richard Steven Walz rst...@armorry.com 22-Apr-04 Impersonating
another user*
33 Richard Steven Worm rstev...@armory.com 24-Apr-04 Impersonating
another user*
34 George M. Feeley geo...@cantrex.com 25-Apr-04
35 Pinkbunny6789 pinkbu...@aol.com 26-Apr-04 Signed "Leah"
36 Billy Taylor someon...@microsoft.com 26-Apr-04
37 Big Brother jo...@sdf.lonestar.org 28-Apr-04
38 Bev A Kupf beva...@mynewaddress.net 29-Apr-04 Impersonating another user
39 Charlie charli...@webtv.net 02-May-04
40 Eugene eugene...@yahoo.com 05-May-04
41 Vote for George W.Bush voteb...@georgewbush.com 05-May-04
42 Richard Steven the Worm [Steve's actual address] 08-May-04
Impersonating another user*
43 Big Brother jo...@otaku.freeshell.org 17-May-04
44 Angiegisth angie...@aol.com 24-May-04 Signed "Angie"
45 brochusla...@usa.com brochusla...@usa.com 23-June-04
Signed "brochus"
46 Jakemarshall0987 Jakemars...@aol.com 29-June-04 Signed "Jake"
47 Jack the Jerk som...@microsoft.com 04-July-04 Signed "Jack"
48 John johnw...@yahoo.com 20-July-04 Contributed by a visitor to
this page
49 John Wolf johnw...@yahoo.com 21-Aug-04 An open and honest one!
50 Big Brother johnw...@yahoo.com 23-Aug-04
51 John john_...@yahoo.com 30-Aug-04
52 nospamnospam.com nospamnospam.com 19-Feb-05
53 Bill bi...@newsgroupmail.com 01-Mar-05
54 dearmike-dearmike-dearmike-dearmike
ikeafhddfdfdf...@dearmike.com 15-Mar-05
55 clintashdgsjdsj sick_dick_clinton_sdjedjkf
clintonfitch.clintonfit...@clintonthedick.mim
18-Mar-05
56 Shaalabbin son of Ithlah nos...@nospam.com 14-Apr-05
57 Bible John john.d...@x-files.gov 13-May-05
58 Bible John som...@mickeymouseland.com 19-Jun-05
59 Dr. Bible John john.d...@x-files.gov 02-Jul-05
60 Chris Tilley - HPC:Factor [Chris's actual address] 02-Jul-05
Impersonating another user*
61 Shemp H nos...@nospam.com 03-Jul-05
62 John the Baptist Jr. johnw...@yahoo.com 06-Jan-06
63 jesus_chri...@yahoo.com 18-May-06
64Angelo horne...@yahoo.com 26 Aug 06
and of course CERM
Michael Gray
wrote:
- Refer: <1156692346.6...@74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>
John's issue's should only be tackled by a mental health care
professional, in conjunction with a penal correction officer.
Dave
> x-no-archive: yes
> © 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> author
> >john w wrote:
> >> x-no-archive: yes
> >> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:14:30 -0400, NOs...@no.spam wrote:
> >> © 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> >> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> >> author
> >> >On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 05:00:06 -0700, john w <johnw<no>@yoo.how> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>And I learned to behave and be quiet by the age of 10.
> >> >
> >> >Too bad it never stuck with you.
> >>
> >> pot kettle!
> >>
> >> Aren't you the one who makes irrelevant comments in thread after
> >> thread after thread, ALWAYS drawing attention aWAY from the topic and
> >> ONTO YOU?
> >>
> >> Yep! You're the one.
> >>
> >> We call you "the ORIGINAL attention WHORE!"
> >
> >Now here's a candidate for PKB if I ever saw one.
>
> worry about it, now would you?
Weatherly again makes presumptions. I am not and never have been
worried about it. Why would I worry? I have said that Weatherly is a
hypocrite and a liar, as well as a phony, and every time he posts, he
provides more evidence of that. I haven't got a thing in the world to
worry about.
NOs...@no.spam
>
> You spend so much time in here, chasing irrelevancies, you don't have
>5 minutes left for any REAL fun out there in the REAL world!
OTC, old boy, I have plenty of time to enjoy my home , pets, hobbies
be with friends,have BBQ parties, AND tinker on this little thingy we
all know and love, called the computer.
ujb
> x-no-archive: yes
> Š 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> author
>> john w wrote:
>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>> On 26 Aug 2006 20:24:05 -0700, "Dave" <hor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> same paragraph, you say I can't.
>
> You ask questions, and you answer them without even giving the other
> person an opportunity.
>
> You might as well be talking to yourself.
>
> I also have not yet seen any motivation from you for why I should
> cooperate with you on ANYTHING.
run johnnie, see johnnie run!
Jos Flachs
>Path: authen.yellow.readfreenews.net!green.octanews.net!news-out.octanews.net!news.glorb.com!feed.news.qwest.net!mpls-nntp-04.inet.qwest.net!news.qwest.net!not-for-mail
>From: john w <johnw<no>@yoo.how>
>Newsgroups: free.christians,alt.atheism,alt.christnet.public,alt.bible,alt.religion.christian.baptist
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>Subject: Re: The Atheists are such crybabies!
>Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:20:40 -0700
>Message-ID: <sp32f21ctsm0ddrjc...@4ax.com>
>References: <1156539301.7...@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <1156540285.1...@74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com> <7b0ve21c8p8sqjfuk...@4ax.com> <t88ve2dm0ea8ucvlo...@4ax.com> <4id0f2hidsm1qidkl...@4ax.com> <cYydnbUFl7VABW3Z...@megapath.net>
>X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0634-2, 08/24/2006), Outbound message
>X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
>Lines: 55
>Organization: Qwest Communications Corporation
>NNTP-Posting-Host: 0747f7a1.news.qwest.net
>X-Trace: DXC=Ra0CV1iFnHMI\1Qk9H4aIMF85SKJoGf>DLL<?ViYU9MJgRiX5Ran0@KSkXT\\;jgJJOQe;c?O6=PL2EQT4TGZ7:MMi]0ElMo@LD
>X-Complaints-To: ab...@qwest.net
>Xref: authen.yellow.readfreenews.net free.christians:100328 alt.atheism:4465949 alt.christnet.public:225244 alt.bible:1235607 alt.religion.christian.baptist:940388
>>Any time you want to leave alt.atheism is fine with us...
>
>
>I'm not in alt.atheism. I'm in alt.religion.christian.baptist.
This lie was proudly presented by Bap-pissed Incest Stories Co., Ltd.
Managing Porn Writer: John Weatherly.
NOs...@no.spam
>x-no-archive: yes
>On 27 Aug 2006 08:25:46 -0700, "Budikka666" <budi...@netscape.net>
>wrote:
> Š 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
>article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
>author
>>john w wrote:
>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>> On 25 Aug 2006 14:11:25 -0700, "Joshua Aaron" <tennes...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> Š 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
>>> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
>>> author
>>> >horne...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>> >>...Its amazing that the lack of reaading comprehension of my first post seems to be lacking from these atheists.
>>> >
>>> >What it is more amazing is to view your lack of spelling ability in
>>> >this post. What is reaading anyway?
>>>
>>>
>>> For his lack of spelling and poor grammar, he makes some good points.
>>>
>>> Are you afraid to address the issues he raises?
>>
>>What issues?!! If you have issues, lay them out here, support them,
>>and I'll take on both of you in a formal debate of them. Deal?
>
>I have long said, and I will repeat here, for any who don't remember
>my position on debating. It is my personal preference to not debate.
>
The only reason for this is because you don't know what you're
mumbling about, and you always LOSE the argument, weatherless...
>On any given issue, I will present my POV, if I feel it is merited.
>
You ALWAYS feel your 'POV' is not only merited, but that the entire
world of Usenet should consider itself both blessed and privileged to
see them, old boy!
>But a "back-and-forth" where one or the other hopes to "win" the
>"battle" does not interest me.
>
sure, sure, liar-johnnie, sure......
>I choose (and I believe it's my "calling") to seek those who are
>sincerely searching, and to reserve my few hours for them.
>
BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
You're enough to sour any decent person looking for Christian answers,
weatherless.
How many people will you tell to 'go ---- themselves' TODAY, and still
falsely claim what a good Christian you think you are?
You're a joke, a sham, and a total DISGRACE to real Christianity and
Christians everywhere.
NOs...@no.spam
> John Wolf and me.
Talking to yourself, you mean .....
NOs...@no.spam
I totally agree with this message.
Robibnikoff
"john w @yoo.how>" <johnw<no> wrote in message
news:sp32f21ctsm0ddrjc...@4ax.com...
> x-no-archive: yes
> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:54:21 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
> © 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> author
>>
>>> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 08:19:06 +0700, Jos Flachs <xwcr...@ksc15.th.com>
>>> © 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
>>> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
>>> author
>>>>free.christians,alt.atheism,alt.christnet.public,alt.bible,alt.religion.christian.baptist:
>>>>
>>>>>x-no-archive: yes
>>>>>On 25 Aug 2006 14:11:25 -0700, "Joshua Aaron" <tennes...@gmail.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>> © 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
>>>>>article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
>>>>>author
>>>>>>horne...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>>>>...Its amazing that the lack of reaading comprehension of my first
>>>>>>>post seems to be lacking from these atheists.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What it is more amazing is to view your lack of spelling ability in
>>>>>>this post. What is reaading anyway?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>For his lack of spelling and poor grammar, he makes some good points.
>>>>>
>>>>>Are you afraid to address the issues he raises?
>>>
>>> You should admit that you "raise lots of issues", but you refuse
>>> challenges put to YOU!
>>> And I have repeatedly said that I don't waste MY time with "skeptics"
>>> and "atheists".
>>
>
>
> I'm not in alt.atheism. I'm in alt.religion.christian.baptist.
And you're crossposting to free.christians, alt.atheism,
alt.christnet.public and alt.bible.
>
> Any time you folk want to stop cross-posting to/and polluting the
> baptist group (and wasting my bandwidth) is fine with me.
Anytime you want to do the same is fine with us.
Robibnikoff
"john w @yoo.how>" <johnw<no> wrote in message
> x-no-archive: yes
> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:36:05 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
snip
>>You're the one who whined: "And I have repeatedly said that I don't waste
>>MY time with 'skeptics' and 'atheists'."
>>
>>Were you lying?
>
> I don't call a 2-line rebuke "a response."
Who cares what the fuck you'd call it - That's exactly what it was.
Robibnikoff
"john w @yoo.how>" <johnw<no> wrote in message
> x-no-archive: yes
> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 04:37:19 GMT, John Baker <nu...@bizniz.net> wrote:
> © 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> author
>>
>>>x-no-archive: yes
>>>On 25 Aug 2006 14:11:25 -0700, "Joshua Aaron" <tennes...@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>> © 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
>>>article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
>>>author
>>>>horne...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>>...Its amazing that the lack of reaading comprehension of my first post
>>>>>seems to be lacking from these atheists.
>>>>
>>>>What it is more amazing is to view your lack of spelling ability in
>>>>this post. What is reaading anyway?
>>>
>>>
>>>For his lack of spelling and poor grammar, he makes some good points.
>>>
>>>Are you afraid to address the issues he raises?
>>
>>What issues?
>
>
> :-)
>
> Glad you asked!
>
> One issue would be your "hit-and-run" tactics. You ask ridiculous
> questions, and then you ridicule the answers, PRETENDING to "discuss
> serious issues" when all you want to do is throw rocks and ridicule.
>
> Which is childish!
>
> You may as well be throwing rocks and Molotov cocktails at your local
> church during services.
Why do you think that everyone would behave as violently as you would like?
Talk about projection.
<remaining babbling bullshit snipped>
Robibnikoff
"john w @yoo.how>" <johnw<no> wrote in message
> x-no-archive: yes
> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:14:30 -0400, NOs...@no.spam wrote:
> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> author
>>
>>>
>>>And I learned to behave and be quiet by the age of 10.
>>
>>
>>Too bad it never stuck with you.
>
> pot kettle!
>
> Aren't you the one who makes irrelevant comments in thread after
> thread after thread, ALWAYS drawing attention aWAY from the topic and
> ONTO YOU?
Hey, you were the one that was bragging about how you "learned to behave"
when it's obvious from your posts that's bullshit.
Dave
> x-no-archive: yes
> same paragraph, you say I can't.
>
> You ask questions, and you answer them without even giving the other
> person an opportunity.
I'll see if Weatherly can figure this out without my having to spell it
out for him.
> You might as well be talking to yourself.
>
> I also have not yet seen any motivation from you for why I should
> cooperate with you on ANYTHING.
Asked and answered. None of this is written for Weatherly's benefit,
and his reactions are completely irrelevant. He's being *exposed*.
There is no interest in a "conversation" with him.
More to come. Weatherly isn't forgotten...he's just back-burnered.
pumpkin
Oh my!
Just read this thread.......
what a lot of vile name calling and unChristian behaviour. For those of
you who claim to be Christian, just how do you think your Saviour would
feel if he could read this?
The Chief Instigator
>Oh my!
>Just read this thread.......
Probably, "wow, did I ever royally fuck up on *this* one!"...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
Michael Gray
<fiona_ta...@hotmail.com> wrote:
- Refer: <1156772175.3...@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
"I got nailed to a tree for this Weatherly prick, already?
Hey Dad! Got any spare lightning bolts?!"
thomas p
>horne...@yahoo.com wrote in news:1156539301.762082.126180
>@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
>
>> Me and my cousin are on our way to visit Golden Gate Park and on the
>> way stopped at a Library. Its amazing that the lack of reaading
>> comprehension of my first post seems to be lacking from these atheists.
>
>Given what you just wrote, I can understand why people have reading
>comprehension problems when trying to parse your text.
He and his cousin apparently visited a library on the way to Golden
Gate Park. The rest is totally incomprehensible.
>
>> I am hanging out with my cousin PERIOD.. I will return to New York
>> SOON...
>
>Well, zip up before someone calls a cop.
His cousin certainly has an odd name.
Thomas P.
"Life must be lived forwards but understood backwards"
(Kierkegaard)
walks...@datardly.dirty.deeds.done.dirt.cheap.llc
at 12:54 AM, john w <johnw<no>@yoo.how> elected to see if he could
dazzle anybody with his attempt to twist the words of others.
Path:
pubnews.gradwell.net!news-peer-lilac.gradwell.net!bbc!newspeer1.nwr.nac.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!199.218.7.141!news.glorb.com!feed.news.qwest.net!mpls-nntp-01.inet.qwest.net!news.qwest.net!not-for-mail
From: john w <johnw<no>@yoo.how>
Newsgroups:
free.christians,alt.atheism,alt.christnet.public,alt.bible,alt.religion.christian.baptist
Subject: Re: The Atheists are such crybabies!
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:54:40 -0700
Message-ID: <9785f2dbrh7tb52sa...@4ax.com>
References: <1156540285.1...@74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>
<7b0ve21c8p8sqjfuk...@4ax.com>
<t88ve2dm0ea8ucvlo...@4ax.com>
<4id0f2hidsm1qidkl...@4ax.com>
<cYydnbUFl7VABW3Z...@megapath.net>
<sp32f21ctsm0ddrjc...@4ax.com>
<1156649045....@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
<1b93f214mi0gp1040...@4ax.com>
<1156688027....@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> X-Newsreader: Forte
Agent 2.0/32.652
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0634-2, 08/24/2006), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 76
Organization: Qwest Communications Corporation
NNTP-Posting-Host: 34bc0538.news.qwest.net
X-Trace:
DXC=McgSn]\SjFE4BhZYck2HaKF85SKJoGf>DB^?UnOBM1H@gRiX5Ran0@KSkXT\\;jgJJOQe;c?O6=PL2EQT4TGZ7:MYn`CAY@RAfE
X-Complaints-To: ab...@qwest.net
X-Old-Xref: pubnews.gradwell.net alt.atheism:2006632 alt.bible:542688
alt.religion.christian.baptist:555669
>x-no-archive: yes
>On 27 Aug 2006 07:13:47 -0700, "Dave" <hor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Š 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this article
>may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the author
>>john w wrote:
>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>> On 26 Aug 2006 20:24:05 -0700, "Dave" <hor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Š 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
>>> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
>>> author
>>> >john w wrote:
>>> >> x-no-archive: yes
>>> >> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:54:21 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
>>> >
snip
>>> I've discussed and explained this enough that anyone with a moderate
>>> degree of intellect would understand.
>>
>>Weatherly has never "explained" or "discussed" this with anyone.
>>However, since he's claiming that he has, he's free to provide a Google
>>link to a post that he's made in which he's done that. I wonder why he
>>can't do that...
>Interesting! You suggest that I provide a Google link, and then in the
>same paragraph, you say I can't.
You cannot provide a Google link, for you have never held such a
discussion, however, add to that you're flying the yellow ensign it
becomes obvious that you cannot provide a link.
>You ask questions, and you answer them without even giving the other
>person an opportunity.
You are given an opportunity, & you decline to accept it while pretending
that you did not have a chance to respond. It appears to be a portion of
the ongoing problem you have with the English language and comprehension,
according to your posting history that is.
>You might as well be talking to yourself.
Well, if he were to do that, he would certainly have a more interesting
conversation.
>I also have not yet seen any motivation from you for why I should
>cooperate with you on ANYTHING.
Of course not, he does not blindly accept your claims in your lies as
gospel and therefore, he is unworthy of your attention as well as your
attempts to minister to his well-being according to you. A thing most
people are extremely grateful for if they know you.
>>
>>Fact is that there is a difference between explaining and discussing
>>and the sort of whining and assertion-making that Weatherly makes.
>>
>>> Which means you are beneath the moderate level of intelligence, and
>>> puts you somewhere in the IQ range of a houseplant.
>>
>>Feel the love.
>>
>>Of course, Weatherly--and everyone else--knows that I'm more than a
>>match, intellectually, for him. That's why he takes the route that he
>>does in these exchanges.
>>
>>Weatherly is a hypocrite. It's quite clear from his behavior in this
>>regard, and I've been saving his comments due to time constraints.
>>
>>Tuesday night, I'll start dealing with them. *All* of them.
What you going to do, whine to Google and see if they will remove the post
for you. You are unable to contact his news provider and convince them
that you are being picked on, nor can you have his account pulled. Yet
you have had several account pulled from underneath you do your conduct on
USENET. You have to stay with your ISP's news server for they are the
only ones that will stomach you for the sake of your money. It your
posting history jw and the fact that you are no longer able to post
through any news server that has a TOS or AUP that is enforced. By the
way, just out of curiosity, you do realize that once the other persons
articles are no longer on Google, they will be in the same position you'd
like to play. All he has to do is say provide the post where I said that
or be known as a liar. Of course, in your case you are a liar by any
definition of the word, to include the politically correct one.
which wannabe this time jw, the professional loser that thinks if others
cannot find the post that you don't want them to find, they will believe
you in spite of your posting history? Rest assured, this is not the case.
walksalone who find it rather comical that jw acts exactly like a small
child who hides behind his fingers and pretends that what he cannot see
does not exist.
Irreverence is the champion of liberty and its only sure defense. -- Mark
Twain, Notebook (1888)
Budikka666
> x-no-archive: yes
> wrote:
> © 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> author
> >In article <1156692346.6...@74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>,
> >"Budikka666" <budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
> >
> >> john w wrote:
> >> > x-no-archive: yes
> >> > On 25 Aug 2006 14:11:25 -0700, "Joshua Aaron" <tennes...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > =A9 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> >> > article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> >> > author
> >> > >horne...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >> > >>...Its amazing that the lack of reaading comprehension of my first post=
> >> seems to be lacking from these atheists.
> >> > >
> >> > >What it is more amazing is to view your lack of spelling ability in
> >> > >this post. What is reaading anyway?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > For his lack of spelling and poor grammar, he makes some good points.
> >> >
> >> > Are you afraid to address the issues he raises?
> >>
> >> What issues?!! If you have issues, lay them out here, support them,
> >> and I'll take on both of you in a formal debate of them. Deal?
> >>
> >> Budikka
> >
> >Angelo is John Wolf
>
> Wolf and me.
And the response is? Do I hear feet running away in the distance?
Budikka
NOs...@no.spam
>
>There you go again! Thinking anyone but you cares what you think!
>
>(they don't)
Then why do you keep responding, liar=johnnie? You love the ATTENTION,
that's why.
Dave
> x-no-archive: yes
> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 00:23:00 GMT, "Mike Painter"
> <mddotp...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>>> Might I suggest that beating up those you don't like isn't exactly a
>>> "positive response." Wait til you think they're going to swing on
>>> you, and then respond with violence. (answer violence with violence)
>>>
>>
>>Gosh Mr English, what are we going to do today, now that you are off your
>>meds again?
>
> Well, stud! I suppose you could be more selective about what posts you
> read!
Amazing how often Weatherly is simply incapable of taking his own advice...
--
"In the truest sense, freedom cannot be bestowed. It must be achieved." -
Franklin D. Roosevelt
Dave
> x-no-archive: yes
> On 25 Aug 2006 13:55:01 -0700, horne...@yahoo.com wrote:
[Snip]
> By the way, don't sweat how the atheists are dogging me. It is my
> belief that that merely indicates I am doing something positive.
So Weatherly believes that acting in a completely unChristian manner is
"something positive." Hmmmm...
> In short, I can handle it.
Weatherly "handles it" by whimpering, whining, throwing temper tantrums,
telling lies, and using four or five very basic, somewhat scripted
responses.
In short, he *can't* "handle it."
>>I bet he was one of the babies that I regularly beat up in High School
>
> And since you don't name the high school you attended, you don't need
> to capitalize "High School". Say "that I regularly beat up in high
> school..."
No surprise, here...Weatherly, in his zeal to correct grammar, which are
"man's rules," doesn't bother to point out to "Angelo" that the behavior he
describes isn't the mark of a Christian.
>>who always cried to the principle everytime I stepped on their shoes.
>>My cousin tells me of a punk that he also beat up allot when he was in
>>High School that did the same to him.
>>
>>You guys are such babies!
>
> Might I suggest that beating up those you don't like isn't exactly a
> "positive response." Wait til you think they're going to swing on
> you, and then respond with violence. (answer violence with violence)
And, as I've already noted, this is not what Jesus taught. Weatherly
exposes his fraud, yet again, with his own words.
Dave
> x-no-archive: yes
> On 25 Aug 2006 14:11:25 -0700, "Joshua Aaron" <tennes...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> © 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> author
>>horne...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>...Its amazing that the lack of reaading comprehension of my first post
>>>seems to be lacking from these atheists.
>>
>>What it is more amazing is to view your lack of spelling ability in
>>this post. What is reaading anyway?
>
> For his lack of spelling and poor grammar, he makes some good points.
>
> Are you afraid to address the issues he raises?
I see that Weatherly has already been challenged to explain the "issues"
that he represents were raised, and so far in the thread, has not done so.
It's also amusing that Weatherly also presumes to criticize spelling and
grammar and did not generally comment on these "issues," either, yet would
criticize someone else for not doing that. Weatherly is nothing if not a
hypocrite.
Dave
> x-no-archive: yes
> On 27 Aug 2006 08:25:46 -0700, "Budikka666" <budi...@netscape.net>
> wrote:
> © 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> author
>>john w wrote:
>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>> On 25 Aug 2006 14:11:25 -0700, "Joshua Aaron" <tennes...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> © 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
>>> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
>>> author
>>> >horne...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>> >>...Its amazing that the lack of reaading comprehension of my first
>>> >>post seems to be lacking from these atheists.
>>> >
>>> >What it is more amazing is to view your lack of spelling ability in
>>> >this post. What is reaading anyway?
>>>
>>> For his lack of spelling and poor grammar, he makes some good points.
>>>
>>> Are you afraid to address the issues he raises?
>>
>>What issues?!! If you have issues, lay them out here, support them,
>>and I'll take on both of you in a formal debate of them. Deal?
>
> I have long said, and I will repeat here, for any who don't remember
> my position on debating. It is my personal preference to not debate.
>
> On any given issue, I will present my POV, if I feel it is merited.
>
> But a "back-and-forth" where one or the other hopes to "win" the
> "battle" does not interest me.
>
> I choose (and I believe it's my "calling") to seek those who are
> sincerely searching, and to reserve my few hours for them.
In other words, Weatherly will not even identify the "issues" he claims were
raised.
Dave
> x-no-archive: yes
> On 29 Aug 2006 14:53:51 -0700, "Budikka666" <budi...@netscape.net>
> Your comment is typically ignorant and arrogant.
No, it is rather observant, actually...
> I said "No." However, that does not equate with "running away."
It does, in this case, as it does whenever Weatherly stupidly enters a
thread, makes a comment, is challenged about it, and ducks the challenge.
> My wife could offer me a slice of apple pie. I could say "no thanks,
> dear! I'd prefer the banana cream pie."
>
> You are suggesting that I have just leapt from the dinner table and
> done a 90-yard dash to get away from the apple pie. I didn't. I
> stated that I prefer the banana cream.
Of course, this quaint little story has no bearing on the issues in the
thread. Weatherly made a vague comment about the "issues" that were
raised, was challenged to identify the "issues," and can't even work up the
courage to do *that*. He wasn't even necessarily challenged to *debate*
those "issues," just identify them.
Weatherly isn't the brightest person one will ever meet, but he probably
knows that, the instant he identifies the "issues" he claims exist, he'd be
expected to discuss them. He won't do that because he knows that he's no
good in any kind of discussion or debate, so he makes excuses. It's not
his "calling," he tells us. Is it his "calling" to consistently
demonstrate that he is a fraud and a coward? If so, he should be grateful
that he's fulfilling that mission quite well.
Dave
> x-no-archive: yes
> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 04:37:19 GMT, John Baker <nu...@bizniz.net> wrote:
> © 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
> author
>>On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:02:28 -0700, john w <johnw<no>@yoo.how> wrote:
>>
>>>x-no-archive: yes
>>>On 25 Aug 2006 14:11:25 -0700, "Joshua Aaron" <tennes...@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>> © 2006 John Weatherly; all rights reserved; no portion of this
>>>article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
>>>author
>>>>horne...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>>...Its amazing that the lack of reaading comprehension of my first post
>>>>>seems to be lacking from these atheists.
>>>>
>>>>What it is more amazing is to view your lack of spelling ability in
>>>>this post. What is reaading anyway?
>>>
>>>For his lack of spelling and poor grammar, he makes some good points.
>>>
>>>Are you afraid to address the issues he raises?
>>
>>What issues?
>
> Good question!
>
> :-)
>
> Glad you asked!
Interesting. So Weatherly refused to identify the "issues" in reply to one
person, making excuses for that, but will do so for another, later in the
thread. Well, I guess his "calling" changed, if only briefly.
> One issue would be your "hit-and-run" tactics.
Now this is pure hypocrisy...since Weatherly is actually quite famous for
"hit-and-run."
> You ask ridiculous questions, and then you ridicule the answers,
> PRETENDING to "discuss serious issues" when all you want to do
> is throw rocks and ridicule.
>
> Which is childish!
Of course, this is just bizarre. The *thread* in which this commentary
appears was the result of a post by Wolf that claimed that "atheists" are
"crybabies." And why? "It also is strangte how it seems perfectly okay
for Horn to publicly attack my cousin, Jason Gastrich, John Weatherly and
other such christians publicly. But when he is threatened to be epxosed,
the baby cries all over."
Forgetting for the moment that this is not what happened, it is pretty clear
that Wolf and Weatherly share a disdain for being challenged to support
claims and statements that they make. If they view it as ridicule,
psychology can certainly explain that. But, regardless, there is no
evidence for "hit-and-run" tactics by the parties to whom Weatherly
responds.
> You may as well be throwing rocks and Molotov cocktails at your local
> church during services.
If Weatherly believes that he or Wolf represent local churches, he's more
delusional than I would have imagined. Challenging the things that he
claims in these groups is not even remotely comparable to engaging in acts
of violence against local churches.
> snipped the infantile remarks.
>
> so much for "tolerance of other views in the 21st C"
Weatherly will have to go far to convince many of us that he has the sort of
tolerance that he expects of others.
> There simply is no excuse for ADULTS to behave this way. You have NO
> reason other than pure insanity to be posting such fecal matter in
> Christian groups!
These are not "christian groups." They are unmoderated groups on a
*secular* networks that have "Christian" themes. In fact, one of them is
even an atheist-themed group. This has all been explained, before, but
Weatherly has no interest in facts.
> Your ONLY intent is to disrupt!
The intent of many of us is to challenge and discuss, but it's also fair to
point out that Christians wander into non-Christian discussion areas and
quite frequently attempt to evangelize those who have no desire to be
evangelized. Weatherly, of course, has no problem with this, so why isn't
it fair for us to engage in discussion that shows that his alleged beliefs
(he doesn't really believe them, so this is for the sake of argument) are,
at least, ignore or ill-advised?
> And I learned to behave and be quiet by the age of 10.
Apparently, those lessons were forgotten by age 11.
> Which makes YOU -- emotionally and mentally -- an arrested toddler!
Weatherly's alleged childhood lessons, which he clearly no longer applies,
are indications that someone *else* is an "arrested toddler?" Weatherly
applies a rather interesting, but ultimately useless standard.
Dave
> x-no-archive: yes
> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:54:21 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
> <gm...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
[Snip]
>>> And I have repeatedly said that I don't waste MY time with "skeptics"
>>> and "atheists".
>>
>>Any time you want to leave alt.atheism is fine with us...
>
> I'm not in alt.atheism. I'm in alt.religion.christian.baptist.
In fact, the article is cross-posted, and so Weatherly's post appears in
both newsgroups, as well as a few others.
> Any time you folk want to stop cross-posting to/and polluting the
> baptist group (and wasting my bandwidth) is fine with me.
So it's quite all right for Weatherly to post where he, presumably, is not
wanted. He's got God on his side, after all. It falls to the other person
to trim the newsgroups. Weatherly will make no effort.
It's interesting that, speaking objectively, the same standard works for
Weatherly as much as anyone else, but he's too lazy, too arrogant, and
frankly, too interested in the "last word," as substanceless as that may
be, to do what he demands of others.
By the way, the reason that Weatherly doesn't waste his time with "skeptics"
and "atheists," aside from the fact that he hates them (being the great
Christian that he is), is due to his abysmal debate and discussion record.
Dave
> x-no-archive: yes
> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:36:05 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
> <gm...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
[Snip]
>>>>Any time you want to leave alt.atheism is fine with us...
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not in alt.atheism. I'm in alt.religion.christian.baptist.
>>>
>>> Any time you folk want to stop cross-posting to/and polluting the
>>> baptist group (and wasting my bandwidth) is fine with me.
>>
>>You're the one who whined: "And I have repeatedly said that I don't waste
>>MY time with 'skeptics' and 'atheists'."
>>
>>Were you lying?
>
> I don't call a 2-line rebuke "a response."
Weatherly's shifting standards aside, it *was* a "response."
>>Oh, by the way, John Wolf started the cross posting.
>
> And there was this guy standing next to you holding a gun to your head
> DEMANDING that you respond!
>
> I know. Happens to me all the time!
Obviously.
Dave
>>"john w @yoo.how>" <johnw<no> wrote in message
>>news:ld93f2ld68othut83...@4ax.com...
>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:36:05 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
>>
>>snip
>>>>You're the one who whined: "And I have repeatedly said that I don't
>>>>waste MY time with 'skeptics' and 'atheists'."
>>>>
>>>>Were you lying?
>>>
>>> I don't call a 2-line rebuke "a response."
>>
>>Who cares what the fuck you'd call it - That's exactly what it was.
>
> There you go again! Thinking anyone but you cares what you think!
>
> (they don't)
Weatherly needs to get out of the habit of these scripted responses. They
don't work. I, for one, care what Mark thinks, and I happen to know
several others posting do, as well. Weatherly is barely competent to speak
for himself. He should give up speaking for others.
Now, the fact is that Weatherly tries to squirm out of the situation in
which his own words put him. He doesn't bother with skeptics and atheists?
But he did bother? And so, using a shifting standard, Weatherly
unilaterally declares that two lines of response is not a response.
Mark is right. It is a response. Weatherly knows that, he can't refute it,
so he goes to one of his standard, broken-record replies, and *continues*
to respond to an atheist and a skeptic, even though he claimed that he does
not waste his time with them.
Weatherly lied.
Dave
> x-no-archive: yes
> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:20:01 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
> <gm...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
>>>>You're the one who whined: "And I have repeatedly said that I don't
>>>>waste MY time with 'skeptics' and 'atheists'."
>>>>
>>>>Were you lying?
>>>
>>> I don't call a 2-line rebuke "a response."
>>>
>>>>Oh, by the way, John Wolf started the cross posting.
>>>
>>> And there was this guy standing next to you holding a gun to your head
>>> DEMANDING that you respond!
>>>
>>> I know. Happens to me all the time!
>>
>>Skippy, *you* are the one who said you don't have anything to do with us
>>yet here you are posting into alt.atheism. Why don't you set up a filter
>>to knock out anything xposted to this ng?
>>
>>Because you don't mean what you say maybe?
>
> Interesting how that works! YOu feel like YOU ought to be able to
> cross-post as much as you like! But Christians who do are ....
>
> well, we won't even GO there!
>
> To say NOTHING of we who simply "respond."
But Weatherly said that his two-line "rebuke" wasn't a response. Here, he
give us a few more, after telling us that he doesn't waste his time with
skeptics and atheists. And he includes one of his substanceless, broken
record responses:
> If you were only 1/100th as clever and smart as you think you are!
>
> tsk tsk
Now, according to what appears in KNode, here, Weatherly, who doesn't waste
his time with atheists and skeptics, has responded to atheists and skeptics
19 times in this thread, alone, over the space of just five days. That's
just *this* thread.
I guess he lied again, huh?
Dave
>>john w wrote:
>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>> On 26 Aug 2006 20:24:05 -0700, "Dave" <hor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >john w wrote:
>>> >> x-no-archive: yes
>>> >> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:54:21 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
>>> >
>>> >[Snip]
>>> >
>>> >> >Any time you want to leave alt.atheism is fine with us...
>>> >>
>>> >> I'm not in alt.atheism. I'm in alt.religion.christian.baptist.
>>> >>
>>> >> Any time you folk want to stop cross-posting to/and polluting the
>>> >> baptist group (and wasting my bandwidth) is fine with me.
>>> >>
>>> >> :-)
>>> >>
>>> >> You DO see how that works, don't you?
>>> >>
>>> >> (I was sure you would)
>>> >
>>> >As already pointed out, this is hypocrisy on the part of Weatherly.
>>> >It's okay for him to invade other newsgroups, but it's not okay for
>>> >others to invade what he views as *his* newsgroup.
>>> >
>>> >Of course, there's always the fact that no one is forcing Weatherly to
>>> >read or respond to newsgroup postings by anyone, but he does it, and
>>> >then hypocritically yammers at others.
>>>
>>> I've discussed and explained this enough that anyone with a moderate
>>> degree of intellect would understand.
>>
>>Weatherly has never "explained" or "discussed" this with anyone.
>>However, since he's claiming that he has, he's free to provide a Google
>>link to a post that he's made in which he's done that. I wonder why he
>>can't do that...
>
> Interesting! You suggest that I provide a Google link, and then in the
> same paragraph, you say I can't.
>
> You ask questions, and you answer them without even giving the other
> person an opportunity.
I see that Weatherly never did quite figure this out...
> You might as well be talking to yourself.
>
> I also have not yet seen any motivation from you for why I should
> cooperate with you on ANYTHING.
Just as Weatherly has never figured out that his motivation should include
things like honesty, credibility, integrity, and a Christian standard for
behavior. Those constitute fair motivation, I should think. It's
interesting, but not surprising, that Weatherly is not motivated by them.
Budikka666
> x-no-archive: yes
This from the asshole who copyrights his messages on Usenet? What a
fucking mornon you are. And yes, you're running, you just don't have
the guts to admit it.
And it's not apple pie. It's egg on your face. Buh-bye now.
Budikka
Michael Gray
- Refer: <ld93f2ld68othut83...@4ax.com>
>x-no-archive: yes
:
>And there was this guy standing next to you holding a gun to your head
>DEMANDING that you respond!
>
>I know. Happens to me all the time!
At last, some honesty.
I actually believe you.
Michael Gray
wrote:
- Refer: <JKhJg.3971$B14.3505@dukeread03>
>john w wrote:
>
>> x-no-archive: yes
>> On 25 Aug 2006 14:11:25 -0700, "Joshua Aaron" <tennes...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> article may be used elsewhere without express written consent of the
>> author
>>>horne...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>...Its amazing that the lack of reaading comprehension of my first post
>>>>seems to be lacking from these atheists.
>>>
>>>What it is more amazing is to view your lack of spelling ability in
>>>this post. What is reaading anyway?
>>
>> For his lack of spelling and poor grammar, he makes some good points.
>>
>> Are you afraid to address the issues he raises?
>
>I see that Weatherly has already been challenged to explain the "issues"
>that he represents were raised, and so far in the thread, has not done so.
>It's also amusing that Weatherly also presumes to criticize spelling and
>grammar and did not generally comment on these "issues," either, yet would
>criticize someone else for not doing that. Weatherly is nothing if not a
>hypocrite.
He is both.
A "Nothing" and a "Hypocrite".