Attn all Computer web designers
Bible John
design please reply.
Okay on my published works page
http://johnw.freeshell.org/bible/published_works.htm
I have many bible messages/bible studies. The messages were originally
created in MS Word, and from there I converted them to HTML format.
Often when I do this the htm files look different and in some cases
words are missing from the original MS Word document.
I want my messages and study curriculum (when I decide to add it) to
look good enough for a pastor to print off and use. Would you suggest I
add the original MS Word documents to the page or convert them all to a
.pdf format? Pdf files take up allot of disk space, and cant always be
viewed on all computers and because I am using Word 98 for the older Mac
os I will need to save each file as a post script file and then have OSX
convert them to pdf files. This can take some work. Or do you suggest
I just clean up my already current htm files? I suppose htm files will
work, but oftentimes professional curriculum and messages are in a pdf
format as html files seem tom look different on each computer you visit.
Thanks for the tips. I chose Mac OSX over Windows XP being that OSX is
based on a much stabler Unix over a Windows NT.
John
--
BA Church Education Ministries AS Business/IT specialist
CERM- Church Education Resource Ministries
http://johnw.freeshell.org/bible/
http://johnw.freeshell.org/bible/unbeliever_list.htm
2 Tim 4:2
AIM: Crucifyself03
Spelling and grammar errors left
in for those that
need their life fulfilled by correcting me
John McWilliams
> Those of you in these boards that are well experienced in web page
> design please reply.
>
> Okay on my published works page
>
> http://johnw.freeshell.org/bible/published_works.htm
>
> I have many bible messages/bible studies. The messages were originally
> created in MS Word, and from there I converted them to HTML format.
> Often when I do this the htm files look different and in some cases
> words are missing from the original MS Word document.
>
> I want my messages and study curriculum (when I decide to add it) to
> look good enough for a pastor to print off and use. Would you suggest I
> add the original MS Word documents to the page or convert them all to a
> .pdf format? Pdf files take up allot of disk space, and cant always be
> viewed on all computers and because I am using Word 98 for the older Mac
> os I will need to save each file as a post script file and then have OSX
> convert them to pdf files. This can take some work. Or do you suggest
> I just clean up my already current htm files? I suppose htm files will
> work, but oftentimes professional curriculum and messages are in a pdf
> format as html files seem tom look different on each computer you visit.
>
group in the event you are looking for information and not trolling.
If there's something the other groups want to talk about, great. Please
remove the mac. groups from that if you would.
--
John McWilliams
NotMe
http://www.foxitsoftware.com/pdf/rd_intro.php
"Bible John" <john.d...@x-files.gov> wrote in message
news:john.doggett-FD25...@News-West.newsfeeds.com...
Pastor Dave
<m...@privacy.net> spake thusly:
>Might offer a link to an alternative PDF reader.
>
>http://www.foxitsoftware.com/pdf/rd_intro.php
I saw the way cool "copy & paste" feature,
which Adobe doesn't have.
Tell me, does it have the ability to zoom
in and out, like Adobe? And will it replace
Adobe as the default, so that when I go
to load a PDF file on the Internet, it will
be called up, instead of Adobe?
Also, when I scroll, will it also scroll in
real time, like Adobe 7? Or will I not
see the pages moving until I let go,
like previous versions of Adobe?
>"Bible John" <john.d...@x-files.gov> wrote in message
>news:john.doggett-FD25...@News-West.newsfeeds.com...
>| Those of you in these boards that are well experienced in web page
>| design please reply.
>|
>| Okay on my published works page
>|
>| http://johnw.freeshell.org/bible/published_works.htm
This page has errors. I immediately noticed
the error in teaching that the Sabbath was
changed from Saturday to Sunday. That is
not supported by any Scripture. In fact, the
NT shows that Paul, for example, would go
into the synagogues and teach on the Sabbath.
The Christians gathered on the first day of
the week. That does not mean that the
Sabbath changed.
--
Pastor Dave
http://www.ecclesia.org/truth/solution.html
"The word 'believe' comes from an Old English word,
'bylive'. What we believe, is what we live by.
Don't tell me you believe, if you don't live by it."
- Adrian Rogers
http://www.delusionresistance.org/creation/christ_scientific_creation.html
Pastor Dave
<m...@privacy.net> spake thusly:
>Might offer a link to an alternative PDF reader.
>
>http://www.foxitsoftware.com/pdf/rd_intro.php
Okay, I went ahead and downloaded it. :)
It's a nice little reader and fast too!
One question that maybe you can answer...
If I make it the default reader, since there
is no real installation, I guess I would go into
file associations, to reestablish Adobe as
the default?
And to repeat my other question, will it, since
it is the default, open up when I read a PDF
file through the web? I would think it would.
Thanks for the link! :)
Pastor Dave
<news-gr...@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> spake thusly:
>On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:08:01 -0400, "NotMe"
><m...@privacy.net> spake thusly:
>
>
>>Might offer a link to an alternative PDF reader.
>>
>>http://www.foxitsoftware.com/pdf/rd_intro.php
>
>Okay, I went ahead and downloaded it. :)
>
>It's a nice little reader and fast too!
>
>And to repeat my other question, will it, since
>it is the default, open up when I read a PDF
>file through the web? I would think it would.
I tried it out. It doesn't do it. Adobe still
comes up when viewing a PDF from my
web browser.
NotMe
BTW Please try not to cross post to such divergent groups focus on the
specific group (not no 's') that you feel are best suited to respond to the
spacific question
I understand the program reader does all the stuff Adobe's reader does. Why
not visit the site and see for yourself if it will do what YOU want it to
do?
"Pastor Dave" <news-gr...@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:g7b4g19itj4pe198s...@4ax.com...
NotMe
| On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:31:27 GMT, Pastor Dave
| <news-gr...@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> spake thusly:
|
| >On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:08:01 -0400, "NotMe"
| ><m...@privacy.net> spake thusly:
| >
| >
| >>Might offer a link to an alternative PDF reader.
| >>
| >>http://www.foxitsoftware.com/pdf/rd_intro.php
| >
| >Okay, I went ahead and downloaded it. :)
| >
| >It's a nice little reader and fast too!
| >
| >And to repeat my other question, will it, since
| >it is the default, open up when I read a PDF
| >file through the web? I would think it would.
|
| I tried it out. It doesn't do it. Adobe still
| comes up when viewing a PDF from my
| web browser.
|
|
Doc Watson
<john.d...@x-files.gov> said the following funny stuff in this here
little old new 'froup:
>
>Those of you in these boards that are well experienced in web page
>design please reply.
I created and designed my web page -- it's http://www.romath.com/
Please access it and see what you think. If I can help you in any way,
I'll be happy to.
Doc
Bible John
Doc Watson <docwatson@yup> wrote:
> I created and designed my web page -- it's http://www.romath.com/
>
> Please access it and see what you think. If I can help you in any way,
> I'll be happy to.
>
> Doc
Hey Doc and thanks for the offer.
Well take a look at my Published works page and tell me how I can
improve the bible messages format. I want pastors and others to use my
messages for sermons, bible studies, and other CE uses. Should they be
converted to pdf, word or remain as they are in the lame html format?
John
--
BA Church Education Ministries AS Business/IT specialist
CERM- Church Education Resource Ministries
http://johnw.freeshell.org/bible/
http://johnw.freeshell.org/bible/unbeliever_list.htm
2 Tim 4:2
AIM: Crucifyself03
Spelling and grammar errors left
in for those that
need their life fulfilled by correcting me
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Muffin
<jw<no>@yoo.hoo> wrote:
> When -- IF
>
> you ever decide to allow / ask a professional writer/ editor /
> proofreader to gve your prose a final "polish", let me know--- IN
> HERE.
>
> "It's what I do."
>
> jw
>
No it is what you stuff up
And you are NOT a professional writer except of a couple of paragraphs
about singing Christmas tree, how to deflect bullets with a Bible (so long
as it isn't a KJV) and a tail (sic) about a dead cat
Thats a part from a few sex yarns you supposedly flogged on the internet
and prefer not to talk about
Pastor Dave
<m...@privacy.net> spake thusly:
>
>"Pastor Dave" <news-gr...@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:3fh4g1hfvja0tf7r5...@4ax.com...
>| On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:31:27 GMT, Pastor Dave
>| <news-gr...@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> spake thusly:
>|
>| >On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:08:01 -0400, "NotMe"
>| ><m...@privacy.net> spake thusly:
>| >
>| >
>| >>Might offer a link to an alternative PDF reader.
>| >>
>| >>http://www.foxitsoftware.com/pdf/rd_intro.php
>| >
>| >Okay, I went ahead and downloaded it. :)
>| >
>| >It's a nice little reader and fast too!
>| >
>| >And to repeat my other question, will it, since
>| >it is the default, open up when I read a PDF
>| >file through the web? I would think it would.
>|
>| I tried it out. It doesn't do it. Adobe still
>| comes up when viewing a PDF from my
>| web browser.
>|
>|
>Perhaps you need to 'de-select' adobe?
Please explain. I would appreciate the help.
Thanks!
Pastor Dave
<docwatson@yup> spake thusly:
>On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:34:22 -0700, Bible John
><john.d...@x-files.gov> said the following funny stuff in this here
>little old new 'froup:
>
>>
>>Those of you in these boards that are well experienced in web page
>>design please reply.
>
>
> I created and designed my web page -- it's http://www.romath.com/
Do you live in FLA?
Btw, no offense, but that noise is annoying. :)
Dave
> x-no-archive: yes
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:34:22 -0700, Bible John
Snip
> When -- IF
>
> you ever decide to allow / ask a professional writer/
> editor / proofreader to gve your prose a final "polish",
> let me know--- IN HERE.
Well, since you killfiled him, it's going to be a bit problematic,
isn't it?
> "It's what I do."
If it were me, I'd get someone with a better clue about what he's
doing. If your own articles are any indication, it may or may not be
what you do, but you suck at it.
G.T.
"Doc Watson" <docwatson@yup> wrote in message
news:rr35g1pe2puj982t6...@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:34:22 -0700, Bible John
> <john.d...@x-files.gov> said the following funny stuff in this here
> little old new 'froup:
>
> >
> >Those of you in these boards that are well experienced in web page
> >design please reply.
>
>
> I created and designed my web page -- it's http://www.romath.com/
>
Gack.
Greg
Doc Watson
>In article <rr35g1pe2puj982t6...@4ax.com>,
> Doc Watson <docwatson@yup> wrote:
>
>> I created and designed my web page -- it's http://www.romath.com/
>>
>> Please access it and see what you think. If I can help you in any way,
>> I'll be happy to.
>>
>> Doc
>
>Hey Doc and thanks for the offer.
>
>Well take a look at my Published works page and tell me how I can
>improve the bible messages format. I want pastors and others to use my
>messages for sermons, bible studies, and other CE uses. Should they be
>converted to pdf, word or remain as they are in the lame html format?
>
>
>John
Good morning sir.
I accessed your site, and personally, I see nothing wrong with
leaving the html pointers which enlarge the text when clicked on. I do
have a code that is used to bring up the text in mouseover, but the
problem is, the pointer must remain over the title in order to
properly view the text. I was going to use it in my Christian
Encouragement section, but some of the verses I'm using are very long,
and the mouseover is not the most practical for that. So instead, I am
planning to use mouseover for the section titles in it, and simply
have the html pointer to bring up the passages when clicked, like
yours.
Best of luck with your site; looks good. I don't know if I have been
of any help at all, but if I can help you with anything in it, please
don't hesitate to give me a shout. My address is romathATromathDOTcom
When you get the time, please access my site: http://www.romah.com/
and while there, please take a look at the Christian Encouragement
section, as well as sign the Guest Book, will you?
Take care, and God bless
Doc
Doc Watson
<news-gr...@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> said the following funny
stuff in this here little old new 'froup:
>On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 21:15:28 -0400, Doc Watson
><docwatson@yup> spake thusly:
>
>>On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:34:22 -0700, Bible John
>><john.d...@x-files.gov> said the following funny stuff in this here
>>little old new 'froup:
>>
>>>
>>>Those of you in these boards that are well experienced in web page
>>>design please reply.
>>
>>
>> I created and designed my web page -- it's http://www.romath.com/
>
>Do you live in FLA?
>
No, I live in Canada.
>Btw, no offense, but that noise is annoying. :)
What noise am I making in offering to help if I can, Dave?
Doc Watson
following funny stuff in this here little old new 'froup:
>jw wrote:
I agree with this post 100 % - 500 % were it possible.
Doc Watson
said the following funny stuff in this here little old new 'froup:
>
>"Doc Watson" <docwatson@yup> wrote in message
>news:rr35g1pe2puj982t6...@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:34:22 -0700, Bible John
>> <john.d...@x-files.gov> said the following funny stuff in this here
>> little old new 'froup:
>>
>> >
>> >Those of you in these boards that are well experienced in web page
>> >design please reply.
>>
>>
>> I created and designed my web page -- it's http://www.romath.com/
>>
>
>Gack.
>
>Greg
>
I don't expect everyone to like it, Greg. You're entitled to your
opinion.
Robibnikoff
"jw @yoo.hoo>" <jw<no> wrote in message
news:rdt4g19jhbt8s01hj...@4ax.com...
snip
>
> you ever decide to allow / ask a professional writer/ editor /
> proofreader to gve your prose a final "polish", let me know--- IN
> HERE.
>
> "It's what I do."
What? Add a couple of grunts and moans?
--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
galia
"jw @yoo.hoo>" <jw<no> wrote in message
| x-no-archive: yes
| On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 07:28:06 -0400, Doc Watson <docwatson@yup> wrote:
| copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this
| post can be reproduced ANYWHERE w/o expressed written consent of
| author
| you!
|
| You whiny thing!
|
| jw
|
You are just jealous....lol
Dave
> x-no-archive: yes
> On 16 Aug 2005 21:00:21 -0700, "Dave" <hor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this
> post can be reproduced ANYWHERE w/o expressed written consent of
> author
How am I "WAY behind on reality," exactly?
> ...I have stated in here NUMEROUS times that I DELIBERATELY
> do not post "polished" prose in here.
Rrriiiggghhhttt...but you expect others to believe that you are
qualified to polish the prose of others.
> I have also explained why.
I didn't see it, and given that you are a raging liar, I wouldn't
believe it.
> See elsewhere.
Cite a link.
> And the point of not posting polished prose in here is
> part of why I choose to not archive, and why the childish
> dozen or so choose to very illegally and abusively archive
> my posts ANYWAY.
I think you're an idiot, a liar, and a ranting lunatic. However, I do
think that you are aware enough of your many previous gaffes to know
that archiving simply leaves fodder for those that can rightfully go
after you for the stupid things that you say and do. That's why you
don't archive--that and the fact that nearly everything you post is a
testament to your lousy "christianity," exposing you as a fraud.
> .... anything else on your "whine" list?
Don't have one of them, but yours never fails to entertain me.
[archived]
Dave
snip
> >Well take a look at my Published works page and tell
> >me how I can improve the bible messages format.
>
> Doc improve it?
>
> LOL!!!
>
> ROTFLMAO!!!
Yeah, I know that feeling. I had it when I saw you post "it's what I
do."
What you "do" is stupidity and incompetence.
> Ok, BJ, so you don't want me involved!
>
> I withdraw my offer!
Interesting, since you also told "Bible John" that you had killfiled
him.
> You crawl so low, BJ, that you are going to get one of
> the worst HATERs in the group to edit your web page?
Wait a minute...I thought you withdrew your "offer."
> You ARE insane!
>
> "Bad luck!"
>
> (I wouldn't want to lie and wish you "good luck")
You already lied when you said you had him killfiled. So what's one
more, eh?
Pastor Dave
<docwatson@yup> spake thusly:
>>> I created and designed my web page -- it's http://www.romath.com/
>>
>>Do you live in FLA?
>>
>No, I live in Canada.
>
>>Btw, no offense, but that noise is annoying. :)
>
>What noise am I making in offering to help if I can, Dave?
The web page noise, not your words here. :)
JohnH
> x-no-archive: yes
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:10:48 -0700, Bible John
> <john.d...@x-files.gov> wrote:
> copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this
> post can be reproduced ANYWHERE w/o expressed written consent of
> author
> > Doc Watson <docwatson@yup> wrote:
> >
> >> I created and designed my web page -- it's http://www.romath.com/
> >>
> >> Please access it and see what you think. If I can help you in any way,
> >> I'll be happy to.
> >>
> >> Doc
> >
> >Hey Doc and thanks for the offer.
> >
> >Well take a look at my Published works page and tell me how I can
> >improve the bible messages format.
>
>
> LOL!!!
>
> ROTFLMAO!!!
>
>
> I withdraw my offer!
>
> HATERs in the group to edit your web page?
>
>
>
> "Bad luck!"
>
> (I wouldn't want to lie and wish you "good luck")
>
John? Whatever happened to your mantra, "let go, and let God?" And
what about your instructions to others that they "grow up, and move
on?" You still don't have any rational answers for why you don't
practice what you preach, huh John?
>
JohnH
>
> jw
galia
"JohnH" <johnhe...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1124306868.9...@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
LOL .... keeper!!!!
| >
| > jw
|
Scott Ellsworth
Doc Watson <docwatson@yup> wrote:
For what it is worth, I would probably create a page for each topic,
then move the content for that topic to said new pages. Some CSS would
give you a consistent look for them, but that is your call.
I try to put no more than a screenfull or two on any one page, unless
the topic demands it. I would also move the sound it plays when first
accessed to one of those new pages, as it is quite intrusive. No
problem, of course, with that on an individual page, but was a bit
jarring.
Take it for what you paid for it.
Scott
--
Scott Ellsworth
sc...@alodar.nospam.com
Java and database consulting for the life sciences
Muffin
<jw<no>@yoo.hoo> wrote:
==
> On 16 Aug 2005 21:00:21 -0700, "Dave" <hor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this
> post can be reproduced ANYWHERE w/o expressed written consent of
> author
> Since you are WAY behind on reality, I have stated in here NUMEROUS
> times that I DELIBERATELY do not post "polished" prose in here.
>
> I have also explained why.
>
> See elsewhere.
>
> And the point of not posting polished prose in here is part of why I
> choose to not archive, and why the childish dozen or so choose to very
> illegally and abusively archive my posts ANYWAY.
>
>
> .... anything else on your "whine" list?
>
>
> jw
Muffin
<jw<no>@yoo.hoo> wrote:
==
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:10:48 -0700, Bible John
> <john.d...@x-files.gov> wrote:
> copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this
> post can be reproduced ANYWHERE w/o expressed written consent of
> author
> >In article <rr35g1pe2puj982t6...@4ax.com>,
> > Doc Watson <docwatson@yup> wrote:
> >
> >> I created and designed my web page -- it's http://www.romath.com/
> >>
> >> Please access it and see what you think. If I can help you in any way,
> >> I'll be happy to.
> >>
> >> Doc
> >
> >Hey Doc and thanks for the offer.
> >
> >Well take a look at my Published works page and tell me how I can
> >improve the bible messages format.
>
> Doc improve it?
>
> LOL!!!
>
> ROTFLMAO!!!
>
> Ok, BJ, so you don't want me involved!
>
> I withdraw my offer!
>
> You crawl so low, BJ, that you are going to get one of the worst
> HATERs in the group to edit your web page?
>
> You ARE insane!
>
>
> "Bad luck!"
>
> (I wouldn't want to lie and wish you "good luck")
>
> jw
Muffin
<jw<no>@yoo.hoo> wrote:
===
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 07:28:06 -0400, Doc Watson <docwatson@yup> wrote:
> copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this
> post can be reproduced ANYWHERE w/o expressed written consent of
> author
Muffin
<hor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think you're an idiot, a liar, and a ranting lunatic. However, I do
> think that you are aware enough of your many previous gaffes to know
> that archiving simply leaves fodder for those that can rightfully go
> after you for the stupid things that you say and do. That's why you
> don't archive--that and the fact that nearly everything you post is a
> testament to your lousy "christianity," exposing you as a fraud.
>
Absolutely
Muffin
<news-gr...@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 07:27:19 -0400, Doc Watson
> <docwatson@yup> spake thusly:
>
>
> >>> I created and designed my web page -- it's http://www.romath.com/
> >>
> >>Do you live in FLA?
> >>
> >No, I live in Canada.
> >
> >>Btw, no offense, but that noise is annoying. :)
> >
> >What noise am I making in offering to help if I can, Dave?
>
> The web page noise, not your words here. :)
>
>
> --
>
> Pastor Dave
>
> http://www.ecclesia.org/truth/solution.html
>
> http://tinyurl.com/ce97m
>
> "The word 'believe' comes from an Old English word,
> 'bylive'. What we believe, is what we live by.
> Don't tell me you believe, if you don't live by it."
> - Adrian Rogers
>
Sorry but this is quite incorrect - I think you are once again the victim
of a piece of wishful thinking on the part of a preacher who really should
know better.
The word believe is in fact probably derived in a tortuous but well
recorded pattern from the same root as the German word "glauben"
An example of just how tortuous the path a word follows over centuries is
found in the words "fox" and "vixen" which are BOTH derived from the same
root word in German (Fuchs - female Fuchsin)
Believe - often formerly spelt beleeve - came down to us via forms such as
the Saxon "geliefan" and Anglian "gelefan". The modern German "glauben"
is found in Middle High German as "gelouben" There is some possibility
that the actual derivation is in fact the same as the word "love" in the
sence of "to hold dear"
Your preachers error seems to be of the same ilk as the error that
confuses truth with loyalty - however there is more justification for that
confusion in that whilst the concept of truth is philosophically one that
in English is quite strongly derived from Hellenist philosophy, the actual
word is taken from the old German word for loyalty
It is interesting to examine the physical path whereby a word evolved.
But it is often a mistake to think that that derivation in fact is the
sole origin of its present meaning. The meaning of words is derived not
through evolution in the simple sense of physical change to the word - it
comes mainly from cultural usage.
If you examine the worlds best dictionary - The Oxford dictionary - which
is several feet thick you will find that derivations are given from two
distinct source paths - One is the actual physical form of the word - The
other its its cultural use as indicated by its appearance in documents etc
I strongly recommend examining a set of these volumes of the Oxford dictionary
+++++++++++++++++
Tom McDonald
You do seem to have a fondness for cats. If you were God, would
you have made millions of cat species? :-)
--
Tom McDonald
http://ahwhatdoiknow.blogspot.com/
JohnH
>
JohnH
>
> | >
> | > jw
> |
galia
Not that I feel like a fisherman, but I guess you do have a point!
<ARBG> (a real big grin)
Doc Watson
<news-gr...@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> said the following funny
stuff in this here little old new 'froup:
>On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 07:27:19 -0400, Doc Watson
><docwatson@yup> spake thusly:
>
>
>>>> I created and designed my web page -- it's http://www.romath.com/
>>>
>>>Do you live in FLA?
>>>
>>No, I live in Canada.
>>
>>>Btw, no offense, but that noise is annoying. :)
>>
>>What noise am I making in offering to help if I can, Dave?
>
>The web page noise, not your words here. :)
You mean the spaceship taking off?
Doc Watson
<tmcdon...@nohormelcharter.net> said the following funny stuff in
this here little old new 'froup:
>
> You do seem to have a fondness for cats. If you were God, would
>you have made millions of cat species? :-)
I love animals, yes, and have all my life.
As for my being God, beats me- I ain't God!! :o)
ujb
I know what noise he finds grating, but it doesn't sound like anything
taking off!
ujb
G.T.
"Doc Watson" <docwatson@yup> wrote in message
Sound on anyone's index page is highly annoying.
BTW, did you design that page as a counterexample of a well-designed site?
Greg
Dave
> x-no-archive: yes
> On 17 Aug 2005 10:47:26 -0700, "Dave" <hor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this
> post can be reproduced ANYWHERE w/o expressed written consent of
> author
> >
> >snip
> >
> >> >Well take a look at my Published works page and tell
> >> >me how I can improve the bible messages format.
> >>
> >> Doc improve it?
> >>
> >> LOL!!!
> >>
> >> ROTFLMAO!!!
> >
> >Yeah, I know that feeling. I had it when I saw you post
> >"it's what I do."
> >
> >What you "do" is stupidity and incompetence.
>
> Same to ya!
Wow. "I know I am but what are you." What a rousingly clever
come-back.
> And I doubt seriously if you have seen any of my published
> work.
Probably not. Incest porn isn't my thing.
JohnH
alright. If not, just have the lil' woman do it, or whatever!
>
> <ARBG> (a real big grin)
>
JohnH
> x-no-archive: yes
>
Just like I thought, you still don't have a rational answer for why you
don't practice what you preach.
>
> Good point!
>
Just like I thought, you still don't have a rational answer for why you
don't practice what you preach.
>
> And when are YOU going to start demonstrating the life YOU preach?
>
Just like I thought, you still don't have a rational answer for why you
don't practice what you preach.
>
> All I hear/ see from you is the old sermonette about "Do as I say, not
> as I do."
>
Just like I thought, you still don't have a rational answer for why you
don't practice what you preach.
>
> Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm?
>
IOW, you still don't have a rational answer for why you don't practice
what you preach, huh John?
>
JohnH
>
> jw
> >>
> >>
> >> jw
RAS
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 18:41:22 -0400, "NotMe"
> <m...@privacy.net> spake thusly:
>
>
>>"Pastor Dave" <news-gr...@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> wrote in message
>>news:3fh4g1hfvja0tf7r5...@4ax.com...
>>| On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:31:27 GMT, Pastor Dave
>>| <news-gr...@nospam-tampa-bay.rr.com> spake thusly:
>>|
>>| >On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:08:01 -0400, "NotMe"
>>| ><m...@privacy.net> spake thusly:
>>| >
>>| >
>>| >>Might offer a link to an alternative PDF reader.
>>| >>
>>| >>http://www.foxitsoftware.com/pdf/rd_intro.php
>>| >
>>| >Okay, I went ahead and downloaded it. :)
>>| >
>>| >It's a nice little reader and fast too!
>>| >
>>| >And to repeat my other question, will it, since
>>| >it is the default, open up when I read a PDF
>>| >file through the web? I would think it would.
>>|
>>| I tried it out. It doesn't do it. Adobe still
>>| comes up when viewing a PDF from my
>>| web browser.
>>|
>>|
>>Perhaps you need to 'de-select' adobe?
>
>
> Please explain. I would appreciate the help.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
'Start'/'Control Panel'. Go to 'Tools', at the top of the Control Panel
pane; then, 'Folder Options', 'File Types'. Scroll down to .pdf
extension, highlight, and click 'Change'. Browse to the folder with the
program you want to use, click on the executable.
RAS
Pastor Dave
<rst...@rocketmail.com> spake thusly:
>>>| >>Might offer a link to an alternative PDF reader.
>>>| >>
>>>| >>http://www.foxitsoftware.com/pdf/rd_intro.php
>>>| >
>>>| >Okay, I went ahead and downloaded it. :)
>>>| >
>>>| >It's a nice little reader and fast too!
>>>| >
>>>| >And to repeat my other question, will it, since
>>>| >it is the default, open up when I read a PDF
>>>| >file through the web? I would think it would.
>>>|
>>>| I tried it out. It doesn't do it. Adobe still
>>>| comes up when viewing a PDF from my
>>>| web browser.
>>>|
>>>|
>>>Perhaps you need to 'de-select' adobe?
>>
>>
>> Please explain. I would appreciate the help.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>'Start'/'Control Panel'. Go to 'Tools', at the top of the Control Panel
>pane; then, 'Folder Options', 'File Types'. Scroll down to .pdf
>extension, highlight, and click 'Change'. Browse to the folder with the
>program you want to use, click on the executable.
Did that already. It will work if I open a PDF file
that I have saved locally, but not if I open one
through a link in my browser. It must have
something to do with the Acrobat BHO that
Adobe installs. My concern now, is that if I
uninstall Acrobat completely, I won't be able
to open a PDF file from a web link at all.
--
Pastor Dave
http://www.ecclesia.org/truth/solution.html
"The mark of a society that's on its last leg, is when
there is no fear of God." - Adrian Rogers
"The burden of Babylon, which Isaiah the son
of Amoz did see. Howl ye; for the day of
the LORD is at hand; it shall come as a
destruction from the Almighty. Therefore
shall all hands be faint, and every man's
heart shall melt:" - Isaiah 13:1,6-9
(prophecy regarding Babylon, fulfilled in
539 B.C.)
Dave
> x-no-archive: yes
> On 17 Aug 2005 10:47:26 -0700, "Dave" <hor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this
> post can be reproduced ANYWHERE w/o expressed written consent of
> author
> >
> >snip
> >
> >> >Well take a look at my Published works page and tell
> >> >me how I can improve the bible messages format.
> >>
> >> Doc improve it?
> >>
> >> LOL!!!
> >>
> >> ROTFLMAO!!!
> >
> >Yeah, I know that feeling. I had it when I saw you post "it's what I
> >do."
> >
> >What you "do" is stupidity and incompetence.
>
>
> Sniff.
>
> jw
>
> snipped the hate
Oh, right. Let's look at what you snipped:
[Restored portion]
jw> Ok, BJ, so you don't want me involved!
jw> I withdraw my offer!
Interesting, since you also told "Bible John" that you had killfiled
him.
jw> You crawl so low, BJ, that you are going to get one of
jw> the worst HATERs in the group to edit your web page?
Wait a minute...I thought you withdrew your "offer."
> You ARE insane!
> "Bad luck!"
> (I wouldn't want to lie and wish you "good luck")
You already lied when you said you had him killfiled. So what's one
more, eh?
[End restored portion]
So what you snipped was my pointing out your lie. There was no "hate."
Your lies and evasions simply continue, as does your fradulent
"Christianity."
Falcon
>jw wrote:
>
>> (I wouldn't want to lie and wish you "good luck")
>
>You already lied when you said you had him killfiled. So what's one
>more, eh?
Liar John is a pretender and seems to relish in telling tall tales
that have no basis in fact except in his imagination.
--
Ciao,
Falcon
Dave
Snip
> >> snipped the hate
> >
> >Oh, right. Let's look at what you snipped:
> >
> >[Restored portion]
> >
> >jw> Ok, BJ, so you don't want me involved!
> >
> >jw> I withdraw my offer!
> >
> >Interesting, since you also told "Bible John" that you
> >had killfiled him.
> >
> >jw> You crawl so low, BJ, that you are going to get one of
> >jw> the worst HATERs in the group to edit your web page?
> >
> >Wait a minute...I thought you withdrew your "offer."
> >
> >> You ARE insane!
> >
> >> "Bad luck!"
> >
> >> (I wouldn't want to lie and wish you "good luck")
> >
> >You already lied when you said you had him killfiled. So
> >what's one more, eh?
> >
> >[End restored portion]
> >
> >So what you snipped was my pointing out your lie.
>
> What lie?
>
> I changed my mind.
Oh, right...after three days of my pointing it out, this is the best
you can do, huh?
You claimed to killfile BJ, and you were responding to him in pretty
short order after that. You changed your mind almost immediately, but
I pointed it out a couple of days ago and pretty soon after the alleged
killfiling. You even snipped away portions where I pointed out this
lie and didn't answer them. *Then* you decide to tell us that you
changed your mind because you know I nailed you on it, and you can't
get away from it.
You certainly are entitled to change your mind, but I don't think
that's what happened.
> It turned out I realized that BJ is so deceitful, so
> childish, so immature, that it seemed wiser to continue
> to watch him.
Uh, huh. Pot, meet kettle.
> And I don't remember you ever checking in with me or
> anyone else.
That's not required. You post in a group I read. Sucks to be you.
> Why would I check in with you?
I never said you should. Look up _non sequitur_.
> jw
>
>
> > There was no "hate."
>
> > Your lies and evasions simply continue,
>
> Your nose continues to grow.
"I know I am but what are you." Clever.
> MYOB.
Post in a group I read, and it becomes my business. If you want to
spew your bilge against someone and not have others comment, use email.
> >as does your fraudulent "Christianity."
>
> And if I ever thought you thought I was a good Christian,
> I'd probably repent and shoot myself.
I obviously forgot more about how to be a good Christian than you'll
ever know.
> You don't get to judge Christians.
Sure I do. These are, in the end, secular forums, and you are just one
of far too many who fails to understand that the methods (that is, the
witness) is as important as the message.
> The One who does says I'm "ok."
Uh, huh...just like he told you that other thing, right, and I asked
you what he sounded like?
You're as full of shit as they come, pal...and you're a phony.
Dave
Snip
> He fails to realize/ or doesn't care-- that what he is
> doing in here is called "harassment", and is illegal.
Not in Usenet. These are public forums. Anything posted here is open
to response, regardless as to whether or not a coward like you wants
people to respond to him or not.
> He may just realize it, since he hides behind a phony
> name.
Or it may be that you don't know what you're talking about.
Falcon
>On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:57:20 -0700, Falcon <Falco...@verizzon.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On 18 Aug 2005 17:40:06 -0700, "Dave" <hor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>jw wrote:
>>>
>>>> (I wouldn't want to lie and wish you "good luck")
>>>
>>>You already lied when you said you had him killfiled. So what's one
>>>more, eh?
>>
>>Liar John is a pretender
>
>Pathological liar Phony Falcon gets off finding people he thinks he
>can rip.
>
>He fails to realize/ or doesn't care-- that what he is doing in here
>is called "harassment", and is illegal.
It seems, liar John, that you have still not asked your doctor to
help you understand what "Public" means. If you do not want your
posts to a public place answered then start posting in a private
location and then the public will not respond. Noodle on it.
>He may just realize it, since he hides behind a phony name.
Again, Liar John, the only thing even remotely "criminal" is your
unethical behavior of deliberately placing yourself where you admit
to everyone you cannot cope. The only thing "criminal" is your total
lack of personal responsibility.
--
Ciao,
Falcon
JohnH
> x-no-archive: yes
> copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this
> author
> >On 18 Aug 2005 17:40:06 -0700, "Dave" <hor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>jw wrote:
> >>
> >>> (I wouldn't want to lie and wish you "good luck")
> >>
> >>You already lied when you said you had him killfiled. So what's one
> >>more, eh?
> >
> >Liar John is a pretender
>
> can rip.
>
absolutely no reason, at all, to single you out. Your statement is
illogical, ludicrous, delusional, and probably a little looney-tunes.
>
> He fails to realize/ or doesn't care-- that what he is doing in here
> is called "harassment", and is illegal.
>
>
> He may just realize it, since he hides behind a phony name.
>
Here's a word of knowledge for you. There are, in fact, several people
here, maybe even scores and scores of them, literally, who are actually
bright enough to take advantage of the Internet's anonymity. I
didn't fully understand the wisdom of this at first, but you, who is
older and, thus, supposedly wiser, should have realized this long
before me.
Now, for you to sit there, judging and implying that Falcon is doing
something illegal, is just another example of many where you regularly
practice your strangely-skewed, very odd, frequently zany, and often
perverse notions of Christian behavior, which are nothing more than
your sum bodily parts yet remaining fleshly, earthly, and carnal. You
have one foot in the Spirit, but the other foot is still dragging in
the dirt. You're like a struggling dog (or child) that always has to
be first collared and then dragged to the tub.
Luv ya',
JohnH
>
> jw