Atheist Dave Horn slanders me
Bible John
And you are? You cant even debunk my bible messages line by line. Go
and take your pick on my website. Bible Bob is a terrorist but at least
he tries and sometimes succeeds at debunking my points. Well when we
get to Greek its obvious that Bob is more educated. Bible Bob is
probably the most educated of all the terrorists and atheists in
free.christians. Exegetical bible messages take the most time of them
all, and everytime I know Bob will be a challenge.
<as any
reading of his activities in free.christians would reveal. He's
probably even a bit disturbed,>
Was a out patient in a mental hospital a long long time ago, but was
cleared back in 1994. I have no serious illnesses and am fine according
to the last time I saw someone and that was earlier this year. I am not
a concern and am in good mental health, unless you question the
suggestion of the PHD that I saw.
<but Gastrich doesn't care about that.
While feigning sympathy, he'll use Wolf's "pain and distress" selfishly
as a means to attack an enemy. The fact is that Gastrich cares about
Gastrich and no one else, and Wolf should already know that Gastrich
will turn on him in a second, if he thought he had any reason. It's
happened before. It'll happen again. >
Well it was my fault.
John
--
CERM-Church Education Resource Ministries
http://johnw.freeshell.org/bible/
John 14:6 Jesus answered, łI am the way and
the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father
except through me.
AIM-Crucifyself03
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Dave
Bible John wrote:
> <Quite frankly, John Wolf isn't the brightest tool
> in the shed,
>
> And you are?
Well, let's put it this way: I'm brighter than you.
> You cant even debunk my bible messages line by line.
How do you know that? I haven't tried. There you go again, making
things up.
Snip
> <as any reading of his activities in free.christians
> would reveal. He's probably even a bit disturbed,>
>
> Was a out patient in a mental hospital a long long time
> ago, but was cleared back in 1994.
Go back. Or, at least, get into treatment.
> I have no serious illnesses...
As opposed to...?
> ...and am fine according to the last time I saw
> someone and that was earlier this year.
What does "fine" mean? "Not a danger to himself or others?"
> I am not a concern and am in good mental health, unless
> you question the suggestion of the PHD that I saw.
I'll question it, in large part, because *you* posted it.
At the very least, I suspect a bit of attention deficiency, and you do
tend to wander from the point, sometimes.
> <but Gastrich doesn't care about that. While feigning
> sympathy, he'll use Wolf's "pain and distress" selfishly
> as a means to attack an enemy. The fact is that Gastrich
> cares about Gastrich and no one else, and Wolf should
> already know that Gastrich will turn on him in a second,
> if he thought he had any reason. It's happened before.
> It'll happen again. >
>
> Well it was my fault.
He convinced you of that, did he? He bore no responsibility?
Dave
And how many times do I have to tell you that I'm not an atheist? If
you can't even get *that* right, how can you be trusted on even
slightly more complex subjects?
Bible John
"Dave" <hor...@gmail.com> wrote:
Then what are you?
Dave
> In article <1130384023.1...@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> "Dave" <hor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > By the way, "Bible" John, what was the slander?
> >
> > And how many times do I have to tell you that I'm not
> > an atheist? If you can't even get *that* right, how
> > can you be trusted on even slightly more complex subjects?
>
> Then what are you?
I see that you refuse to answer the question. All right, I figured
that. I also see that you won't acknowledge this consistent error that
you make. That's par for the course. But the answer to you is simply,
"not a Christian." And beyond that, does it matter?
rogue
Bible John wrote:
> <Quite frankly, John Wolf isn't the brightest tool in the shed,
> BJ
> And you are? You cant even debunk my bible messages line by line.
JERRY
You don't get it. YOUR BIBLE MESSAGES ARE IRRELEVENT BECAUSE THEY
START FROM AN ASSUMPTION THAT THE BIBLE IS TRUE. No one HAS to debunk
your bible messages line by line. And you won't debate that issue with
an atheist, preferring to run from the debate. Instead, you debate
others who hold that same assumption that the bible is true so you can
argue whether or not your particular interpretation is more valid than
theirs. I call these "invisible friend" arguments, because you are
arguing that your invisible friend is better than their invisible
friend.
> BJ
> Go
> and take your pick on my website. Bible Bob is a terrorist but at least
> he tries and sometimes succeeds at debunking my points. Well when we
> get to Greek its obvious that Bob is more educated. Bible Bob is
> probably the most educated of all the terrorists and atheists in
> free.christians. Exegetical bible messages take the most time of them
> all, and everytime I know Bob will be a challenge.
JERRY
Bob isn't educated. Instead, he takes a Strong's dictionary and
applies the meaning for a particular word in the original text that
most closely supports his interpretation of the text. His
interpretations can vary widely with what every other translator of the
text comes up with. That isn't education.
rogue
Bible John wrote:
> In article <1130384023.1...@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> "Dave" <hor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > By the way, "Bible" John, what was the slander?
> >
> > And how many times do I have to tell you that I'm not an atheist? If
> > you can't even get *that* right, how can you be trusted on even
> > slightly more complex subjects?
>
> Then what are you?
>
Why? Why does everyone need to fit into a neat little box with a label
for you? Are you really that insecure? Haven't you figured out yet
that people are far more complex and so are their beliefs? People
don't fit into neat little categories. Some or most of their actions
may, but their beliefs can't be tucked away that simply.
Just Mark - John Wolf's biggest fan
"Bible John" <john.d...@x-files.gov> wrote in message
news:john.doggett-25EA...@News-West.newsfeeds.com...
: <as any
: reading of his activities in free.christians would reveal. He's
: probably even a bit disturbed,>
:
: Was a out patient in a mental hospital a long long time ago, but was
: cleared back in 1994. I have no serious illnesses and am fine according
: to the last time I saw someone and that was earlier this year. I am not
: a concern and am in good mental health, unless you question the
: suggestion of the PHD that I saw.
[forehead smack - "Idiot!"] This helps to explain soooo much.
Somebody used the phrase "like booing during the Special Olympics"
yesterday. I guess I've been doing that.
My apologies to you, John Wolf.
Enough.
Kamikaze pig missionaries
breathlessly exclaimed:
><Quite frankly, John Wolf isn't the brightest tool in the shed,
Facts are not slander, Johnboy.
>And you are? You cant even debunk my bible messages line by line. Go
>and take your pick on my website. Bible Bob is a terrorist
Unsupported assertions of a derogatory nature are slander, Johnboy.
------------------------------------------------
Conflict over the exact will/purpose/nature of God cannot ever be
resolved, since there are no facts to go on.
D Silverman FLAHN, SMLAHN
AA #2208
Just Mark
"john w @yow.how>" <jw<no> wrote in message
news:62u1m15gpva35t43t...@4ax.com...
: x-no-archive: yes
: On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 15:27:36 GMT, "Just Mark - John Wolf's biggest
: fan" <nunyab...@nospam.com> wrote:
: copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this
: can be used anywhere else without expressed written permission of the
: author.
: >
: >"Bible John" <john.d...@x-files.gov> wrote in message
: Since you bring it up, before I knew you were an atheist, JM, you were
: very kind, very considerate, very accommodating, very "intellectual."
:
: Since I learned and commented on you being an atheist and being
: somewhat deceptive-- as well as intellectually dishonest-- you have
: taken every cheap shot.
So, before YOU learned "x" about me...you considered me "a good guy". After
YOU learned "x"....your perception shifted, and I became "a bad guy". "x"
was always there; the change is that you learned about "x".
Sounds like you're in control of what you think of me. There's not much I
can do about that.
:
: You don't come right out and say-- "so what do you know? You're
: mentally ill? "
:
: But I can read between the lines. I thought you were above that!
Again, you're in control. What you choose to hear in my posts is up to you.
I'm not going to defend ideas you might project on me. They're yours, not
mine.
:
: Now, there you go, doing it to BJ!
I apologized. I couldn't care less about how you perceive it; it wasn't
about you. I'm not interested in gaining your approval, respect, etc.
:
: Wasn't it you, recently who commented on how "unethical" it would be
: to take cheap shots at the mentally ill?
I don't knowingly do so.
:
: And we have contributed MUCH.
:
: DaVinci
: Van Gogh
: Rembrandt
: Virginia Wolfe
: Edgar Alan Poe
:
:
: john w
: >
: