Fantasy Rules Committee Google Group

286:22a

wurm.ourobo...@gmail.com (Ouroboros) — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:52:29 UT

KERIM SIGHTED DEADWOOD WON AT DICE SENT TELEGRAM EIGHTEEN SEVENTY
SEVEN APRIL TWENTY THREE NOONISH STOP INTERCEPTED DECODED READS
WEIGHTED DICE CONFIRMED GOLD SALTED PURCHASED PLOT REGARDLESS NEXT
CENTURY SELL URANIUM RIGHTS DEVELOP TIMESHARE FISHING CABINS STOP
TELEX CHARGES DERIVED FROM WORD COUNT EACH DIGIT CHARGED SAME SINGLE

Re: [frc] True temporal Hijinks?

y.ke...@gmail.com (Kerim Aydin) — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:27:46 UT

The rule that it contradicts (#3, subject-labeled in sending as #2)
was received by me (and by headers, went through the whole system)
about 10 hours before the earliest possible time for this rule, so
INVALID is the right call.

Re: [frc] 286:22

davidni...@gmail.com (David Nicol) — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:23:35 UT

Gilbert Gottfried references may be grounds for invalidity on strictly
aesthetic grounds IMO.
anyway the requirement for misleading penultimate sentences never was
anyway, so trying to subvert it doesn't matter.

Round summary up to #21

y.ke...@gmail.com (Kerim Aydin) — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:19:32 UT

Unless I missed one, next should be #22
Restriction Summary
1. Each rule must further a plan to stop the Judge (Kerim).
2. none
3. Each rule must describe Kerim's actions.
4. Unsuccessful (due to 3).
5. none
6. none
7. Invalid (due to 3).
8. Each rule must clarify immediately preceding rule.

Re: [frc] 286:22

y.ke...@gmail.com (Kerim Aydin) — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:14:31 UT

I'm wondering if the requirement of 15 (FUTURE RULES DESCRIBE UNLIKELY
PAIRS HISTORIC HIJINKS IN REVERSE CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER STOP) is met
here? Thoughts?
In any case this is #21.

Re: [frc] True temporal Hijinks?

ais...@bham.ac.uk (Alex Smith) — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:14:08 UT

If it's valid, its restriction only starts applying once it reaches the
Google Groups server (which you can check on the FRC website). If it
contradicts a rule made long enough before it was /sent/ that its author
really should have seen that rule first (or contradicts the ROs), it's
INVALID; otherwise, if it contradicts a rule made before it

True temporal Hijinks?

y.ke...@gmail.com (Kerim Aydin) — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:08:32 UT

On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Allison From Palmdale
Given both the nickname here and the temporal hijinks of the round,
I'm hesitant to bring this up, but what's advice on where to put this
one in sequence, given the two-day delay in the middle of the delivery
process that leapfrogged it over several submissions? (fortunately

Re: [frc] Re: 286:8

y.ke...@gmail.com (Kerim Aydin) — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:00:59 UT

On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Allison From Palmdale
I really like this restriction, but 286:3 requires reporting Kerim's
actions, and again I can't find it in here (indirect references such
as adding "from Kerim" after "protect the Wizard" would count as it
implies my actions, but this doesn't have it indirectly). Invalid.

Re: [frc] 286:19

y.ke...@gmail.com (Kerim Aydin) — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:54:42 UT

And I would have gotten away with it too, if it hadn't been for you
kids! I'll accept "spring" as a time and this is the epitome of
historical hijinks, although not quite "pairs" of different event I'll
stretch the point as it's the meeting of two things here. Valid.

Re: [frc] 286:18

y.ke...@gmail.com (Kerim Aydin) — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:50:43 UT

Valid. But I took the ferry, and time is like a boat.

Re: [frc] 286:17

y.ke...@gmail.com (Kerim Aydin) — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:47:52 UT

Valid. Of course, if you're traveling in time, the sun's movements
could be west OR east... just one more trick in the international time
criminal's book.

Re: [frc] 286:16

y.ke...@gmail.com (Kerim Aydin) — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:44:46 UT

Valid. Foiled again!

Re: [frc] 286:15

y.ke...@gmail.com (Kerim Aydin) — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:42:40 UT

Valid. (Maybe I'm heading to Mornington Crescent?)

Re: [frc] 286:14

y.ke...@gmail.com (Kerim Aydin) — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:40:04 UT

Valid. Dates are important!

286:22

davidni...@gmail.com (David Nicol) — Thu, 07 Jan 2010 19:23:17 UT

WHAT IS AND IS NOT LEGERDEMAIN NEED NOT BE CONSISTENT STOP
JUDGE KERIM RAPED AND MURDERED A YOUNG GIRL IN NINETEEN NINETY STOP