FW/1 .NET port

[John Allen]

Hey list.

I am about to embark on some .NET work.

I was wondering if anyone has done/considered/thought about porting FW/1 to .NET.

Is this even a stupid question?

John

[Eapen]

Don't think anyone has done it yet - but someone has ported FW/1 to PHP.

https://github.com/rickosborne/php-fw1

http://rickosborne.org/blog/2011/02/php-fw1/

[James Holmes]

With MVC3 available in .NET a FW/1 port is unnecessary.

--
WSS4CF - WS-Security framework for CF
http://wss4cf.riaforge.org/

[John Allen]

I saw the PHP port.

Ill look into the MVC3 stuff. Hopefully it is as clean of a solution.

Thanks.

--
FW/1 on RIAForge: http://fw1.riaforge.org/

FW/1 on github: http://github.com/seancorfield/fw1

FW/1 on Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/group/framework-one

[Sean Corfield]

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:46 AM, James Holmes <james....@gmail.com> wrote:
> With MVC3 available in .NET a FW/1 port is unnecessary.

Yeah, in general no one writes frameworks for .NET languages because
an MVC framework is essentially built-in.

For the record: I don't do PHP ever (so I'm grateful for Rick
Osborne's port but I would never be able to support it) and I don't do
Windows ever (so the same goes for anyone who decides to port FW/1 to
.NET).
--
Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/
Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://www.getrailo.com/

"Perfection is the enemy of the good."
-- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880)

[James Holmes]

On 26 March 2011 00:33, Sean Corfield <seanco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:46 AM, James Holmes <james....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> With MVC3 available in .NET a FW/1 port is unnecessary.
>
> Yeah, in general no one writes frameworks for .NET languages because
> an MVC framework is essentially built-in.

.NET MVC is also convention based, comes out of the box with SES URL
routes and now (with MVC3) comes with a templating engine (Razor) that
replaces that awful aspx rubbish (which was a leftover from winforms).
So people familiar with FW/1 won't find anything too strange moving to
it.

[John Allen]

Thanks James.