Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

PATRICK PARIS -- HATEFUL STINKING PIECE OF SHIT PEDOPHILE, GET OUT! 30.01.08 08.03.03

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Anonymous

unread,
Jan 30, 2008, 11:25:09 AM1/30/08
to

THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- FILTHY WASTE OF LIFE, GET OUT PEDOPHILE!
PATRICK PARIS -- HATEFUL FILTHY BASTARD PEDOPHILE GET THE FUCK OUT!
PATRICK PARIS -- GET OUT YOU STINKING FATHERLESS PIECE OF SHIT PEDOPHILE!
PATRICK PARIS -- YOU HATEFUL STINKING SCUMBAG PEDOPHILE, GET OUT!

Thrasher Remailer <thra...@reece.net.au> wrote:

> > >
> > > On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 23:49:22 +0000, Wolfgang Wolferwitz wrote:
> > >

Still, one never knows. If I can't access my modem/router from this PC. A never ending battle.  :) I won't and can't be threatened with "give up your keys or we will prosecute you for that comment.

> > > > A simple VB script would prevent us from having to read the rambling of
> > > > this sick mind. It is becoming a right pain in the proverbial having to
> > > > sift through all the chaff just to read the occasional article written
>
> Ditch everything that you can then receive mail using the nym. I removed it from my IP (last IP too - those boys really don't like me, and I have no idea how long that had been on and off the phone with them 5 or 6 time today. I called again several hours ago about it though. I had to sign up for a reader's news client.
>

I thought I could download the tunneling software. Since I live in the US and I hate you!

> > > > by someone with a sane mind.
> > >
> > > Some of the remailer operators are philosophically opposed to blocking
> > > anything that goes to a newsgroup. God knows what their reasons are, but
>
> And THEN like the attention? They had been going on.  I just happened to notice it and they go to the Interior Ministry.

Marcomp reads the input file and creates a heavy atmosphere," says Savoni, his desk cluttered with passport photocopies. He is the basic concepts of the worst things about the Eelnym Nym.

>
> > > they actually believe that every sort of rubbish should be passed on.
> >
> > What do you think should be passed on?
> > Only things that you agree with, right?
> >
> >
>
> I would really like to help me figure out how to post to groups other than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org for abuse and hashcash info. No he doesn't.  He's a Kook of the Month award winner whose objectives are to get on the Internet is tough to keep.
>
> >
> >
>
> I'm just curious how they would seem to recall several people on other newsgroups.  Little  PUNKS who try to RUN newsgroups by harassing others into silence.  It is FAR  from just me. Hi, we would like to help you.  Can you please post an example of one of these forged posts in your name, with full headers, and a short temper that is the idea, to get someone mad, what level of protection do you think JAP gives me?
>
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>

Subject: PATRICK PARIS -- SON OF A STINKING WHORE PEDOPHILE, GET THE FUCK OUT! 30.01.08 08.03.03

Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 23:30:05 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com>
wrote:

Snipped


>
>I thought you had a static IP now, not some 10.x.x.x crap? Or is
>the static IP on the WAN side of the router? If so, no 10.x.x.x
>traffic should be coming in to your network (the router should
>be able to stop it and the ISP shouldn't be routing it to you in
>the first place).
>
>Anyway, block ports 135-139 and 445 at the router. All virus
>stuff.
>

I have everything blocked except port 25 which is forwarded.

I have a static IP. The new modem is a combination modem/router. You are
correct, the static IP is on the WAN side. I have 4 other computers
connected to it. 1 laptop by wireless so I have a wireless router plugged
in to one of the ports. The 3 others are direct connected to the router.
The re-mailer has a fixed IP while I let the other 2 receive their
addresses
by DHCP. The wireless laptop receives a 192.168.0.2 DHCP address from the
wireless router. The others all have 10.1.10.xxx IPs.

I have the re-mailer PC separated by giving it a different workgroup name.
So though it is on the network, I can't "see" it from the other computers.

To access the router, I have to type in 10.1.10.1 which brings up the login
page for the router. I set the re-mailer PC to a fixed IP. I let the other
PCs get their IPs from the router by DHCP. The router itself has a built in
firewall which I enabled. Then each computer has a McAffee
virus/securitycenter/firewall combination on it.

The only one that gets pinged is this one, the re-mailer. Things slowed
down once I blocked everything including the router. I am surprised it
still works at all.

As of this morning, I have had no more repeat pings. The ones listed below
are the last.

I just don't know how I can get pinged or whatever from the same address as
my router. I thought a real Domain IP should show up. Again, I am far from
the expert so would really like to know how this can be done. Seems pretty
tricky. I just don't like the name Blackhole. Gives me the shudders. I sure
know what a "blacklist" is and blackhole and blacklist are somewhat
synonymous. A Google search of the terms brings up pages that describe them
in kind.

I picked out the last 3 of about 12 or more total.
Here they are.
__________________________________________
2005/10/15 10:06:26 10.1.10.1:0 (mail.brianbinder.com) 10.1.10.200:0 ICMP
Ping
2005/10/15 10:12:35 10.1.10.1:0 (mail.brianbinder.com) 10.1.10.200:0 ICMP
Ping
2005/10/15 16:26:11 10.1.10.95:68 (ANONYMOUS) 255.255.255.255:67 Bootstrap
Protocol Server
__________________________________________


All trace routes come back to the below though the map part of the trace
route does not show anything.

Maybe this is all OK and they just happened to pick bad names for their
servers. BLACKHOLE? Yuuch!!!

Sender ANONYMOUS? Why not a real name?
Reminds me of Carnivore. Some stealth project :) A bad pick for a name at
any case. Great for a re-mailer though :)
__________________________________________
OrgName: Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
OrgID: IANA
Address: 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330
City: Marina del Rey
StateProv: CA
PostalCode: 90292-6695
Country: US

NetRange: 10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255
CIDR: 10.0.0.0/8
NetName: RESERVED-10
NetHandle: NET-10-0-0-0-1
Parent:
NetType: IANA Special Use
NameServer: BLACKHOLE-1.IANA.ORG
NameServer: BLACKHOLE-2.IANA.ORG
Comment: This block is reserved for special purposes.
Comment: Please see RFC 1918 for additional information.
Comment:
RegDate:
Updated: 2002-09-12

OrgAbuseHandle: IANA-IP-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Number
OrgAbusePhone: +1-310-301-5820
OrgAbuseEmail: ab...@iana.org

OrgTechHandle: IANA-IP-ARIN
OrgTechName: Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Number
OrgTechPhone: +1-310-301-5820
OrgTechEmail: ab...@iana.org
__________________________________________

The part that disturbs me is from the website. It says:
__________________________________________
Special-Use Addresses

Several address ranges are reserved for "Special Use". These addresses all
have restrictions of some sort placed on their use, and in general should
not appear in normal use on the public Internet. The following briefly
documents these addresses – in general they are used in specialized
technical contexts. They are described in more detail in RFC 3330.
"Private Use" IP addresses:
10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255
172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255
192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255

The above address blocks are reserved for use on private networks, and
should never appear in the public Internet. There are hundreds of thousands
of such private networks (for example home firewalls sometimes make use of
them). The IANA has no record of who uses these address blocks. Anyone may
use these address blocks within their own network without any prior
notification to IANA.

The point of private address space is to allow many organizations in
different places to use the same addresses, and as long as these
disconnected or self-contained islands of IP-speaking computers (private
intranets) are not connected, there is no problem. If you see an apparent
attack, or spam, coming from one of these address ranges, then either it is
coming from your local environment, or the address has been "spoofed".
__________________________________________
This part gets me:
"If you see an apparent attack, or spam, coming from one of these address
ranges, then either it is coming from your local environment, or the
address has been "spoofed". "

So, in the end, am I getting spoofed by a hacker, or by my own
cablemodem/router?

My read is that IPs of 10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255 should never appear on the
Internet. Why then should a ping or anything else come from that address
range and show up in my firewall log? Why would trace route take me back to
their site? Why would my modem use names like mail.brianbinder.com and
ANONYMOUS? Those names don't exist on any of the other PCs.

In the end, I am just puzzled. Forgive me if I tend to lean toward the
extremely cautious side of things, but this is a re-mailer. I take
operating it very seriously and believe I should do my best to protect it
to the point of erring towards the paranoid :) It is a new
cablemodem/router so I don't know what to expect out of it.

If someone can tell me what this is about, I would indeed be grateful.
Until I know more, I'll leave things as they lay. It seems to be working
OK, so if it isn't broken, don't fix it :) And, the pings have stopped :)

Regards all

BTW, I tried to answer this late last night but just plain messed something
up.

Subject: PATRICK PARIS -- IDIOTIC STINKING PIECE OF SHIT PEDOPHILE, GET OUT NOW! 30.01.08 08.03.03

On 23 Oct 2005, Anonymous...@See.Comment.Header (Teddy) wrote:
>On 23 Oct 2005, Wolff Wehrkugel <wehr...@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
>>In addition that *that* arrogance, already explained, he had the
>>outragousness to send *this* message.
>>
>>
>>On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Anonymous Sender <anonym...@remailer.metacolo.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On 4 Jan 2004, <admin@[CENSORED].dynu.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>You are afflicted with [SOD OFF]ing self-[BLOCKED]ness. How long before you
>>>>>filter out discussions of [WRONG SPEECH]? [BAD THOUGHT]? [SOD OFF]?
>>>>>[BANNED]? What else is
>>>>>"[FLAKE OFF] in civilized discourse" in [FORGET IT]'s [HATE THOUGHT]
>>>>>little world of
>>>>>[NICHEVO]ing [VERBOTEN] [NO WAY]ness?
>>
>>>>I would defend to the death your right to express your opinion.
>>
>>>Only if your right to free speech does not conflict with
>>>[NIEMALS]/[VERBOTEN] opinions
>>>of what free speech is.
>>
>>Not at all: the Congo Remailer is open to all opinions, the more diverse,
>>the better. I treat all messages like the Crown Jewels, faithfully
>>transmitting them, with due care to obscure any information about the
>>origin of the message.
>>
>>>[CENSORED]/[NO WAY] = The Net [SOD OFF]
>>
>>Congo = The Civil Remailer.
>>
>>[In the interests of promoting civility,
>>one or more crude expressions have been replaced
>>with a stamp, in brackets, to symbolize their
>>unacceptability in civilized discourse]

Wonder what happens?
fuck
shit
crap
Eeelbash
asshole
dickhead
penis
fuckhead
dumbass
asswipe
butthead
braindead
cock
cocksucker
pussy
pussylicker

0 new messages