Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

PATRICK PARIS -- FILTHY PIECE OF SHIT PEDOPHILE, GET OUT NOW! 31.01.08 04.03.00

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Nomen Nescio

unread,
Jan 31, 2008, 6:50:09 AM1/31/08
to

THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- MORALLY BANKRUPT SHITBAG. GET OUT FILTHY PEDOPHILE!
PATRICK PARIS -- FILTHY STINKING WORTHLESS PEDOPHILE, GET OUT!
PATRICK PARIS -- YOU FILTHY STINKING PIECE OF PIG SHIT PEDOPHILE, GET OUT!
PATRICK PARIS -- YOU STINKING FILTHY PEDOPHILE, GET OUT NOW!

On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:24:42 -0500, Joe Fox <Ny...@none.invalid> said
in alt.usenet.offline-reader.forte-agent:

>Excuse the top-post, but it seems to me that a really good ng to find
>solutions involving email anonymity would be alt.privacy.anon-server

Anon servers don't give you anonymity from anyone but the receiver.

Subject: PATRICK PARIS -- HATEFUL FILTHY BASTARD PEDOPHILE GET THE FUCK OUT! 31.01.08 04.03.00

noright to privacy I will
track them down like the
skunks they areAnd yes
I think that content is
something that must be
looked at andwhen it is
found to fall into the
scumbag category
Yes I am just mentioning that
according to
myjudgement may and
will be used to censor the
post I will not I
meanpossibly and in the
future allow Eelbash to
be used as a conduit
forevery species of
filthThen we have those
harassed by the enemy
out to crush them not
concerned with giving them
a fair price they can live
on And unfortunately
what the US says on
those matters still carries
the day worldwideAt the
moment I dont have to
tools to do the job
properly a keywordsearch
program is needed but
when I do the temptation
to use it may
beoverwhelmingPlease
out to crush them not
note that none of this is
the case now I am simply

note with your thoughts on
how such measures
disclaimer and forced From
header would affect your
posting here or to any
will continue to prioritize
action to monitor Internet
use without notifying the
person in question It is a
technical newsgroup for
the best ways to
discourage unwanted
posting through
remailersLike other
owners of Internet cafes
Savoni had to obtain a new
public communications
business license and
purchase tracking
software that costs up to

Subject: PATRICK PARIS -- GET THE FUCK OUT YOU FILTHY STINKING SCUMBAG PEDOPHILE! 31.01.08 04.03.00

On 8 Nov 2005, Anonymous <Use-Author-Supplied-Address@[127.1]> wrote:
>On Tue, 08 Nov 2005, Eelbash Admin <ad...@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
>>
>>On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 18:30:05 +0100, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>>
>>Some very angry and disturbed tripe, below.
>>
>>
>>>>The Eelbash remailer is a last-hop remailer.
>>>
>>>>It provides full FROM headers.
>>>
>>>>Disclaimers are put into newsgroups as needed.
>>> Oh great, tampering with mail again. Fuck you.
>>>
>>>>If all else fails, the newsgroup will be temporarily blocked.
>>> How the hell are we supposed to know if they are blocked?
>>
>>I'll let you know here.
>>
>>>
>>>>The Eelbash remailer allows PLAIN TEXT messages only.
>>> All the easier for you to read them. You perverted fucking asshole.
>>
>>Don't talk nonsense; all it means is that html is not allowed, and
>>binaries are not allowed.
>
>Eelbash, you are a liar. LIAR.
>
>What it actually means is that messages do not have to be encrypted to be
>accepted. HTML and binaries ARE accepted, if they are encrypted.

I have not bothered to look at his cap string. Nor will I. But the way he
stated it implies that he will not accept encrypted messages. Only plain
text:

"The Eelbash remailer allows PLAIN TEXT messages only."

Can anyone really feel safe using his re-mailer? I sure as hell don't. Does
he have any clue what he is doing? Do you want to trust your confidential
mail to him?

BTW, twisty was concerned with altering the content of mail, not the issue
of permitting floods. Read his comments again. He has blocked attempted
floods. Freedom of speech does not give one the right to flood. Freedom of
speech does mean that the contents of a message cannot be altered by a
self-appointed censor.

0 new messages