PATRICK PARIS -- HATEFUL FILTHY PEDOPHILE GET OUT NOW! 19.02.08 08.03.03
Anonymous Sender
THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING, GET THE FUCK OUT NOW YOU STINKING PEDOPHILE!
PATRICK PARIS -- GO SOMEPLACE AND DIE YOU FILTHY PEDOPHILE. GET OUT NOW!
PATRICK PARIS -- HATEFUL STINKING PEDOPHILE, GET OUT NOW!
PATRICK PARIS -- FILTHY STINKING WORTHLESS PEDOPHILE, GET OUT!
In article <YJLAY9F138147.4308217593@Gilgamesh-Frog.org>,
Eelbash Admin<Anonymous...@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
> It is simple: with Frog retiring, there are only 2, possibly 3, adult
> remailer operators left. I decided to do my bit for a responsible and
> adult remailer system by running Bushwa.
>
In addition to *this* arrogance, remember he also publicly campaigned for
the delisting of Austria and Dizum. He also told us that because of his
breeding, he was superior to the rest of us.
Yes, those actually were his reasons.
This all came after his failed attempt to institute hate-speech filters and
his "editing" of his users posts. This "superior champion of privacy" used
to read and edit users posts to make sure they met his criteria for
political correctness.
Then came his admission that he was unaware that mixmaster was a server as
well as a client, and that he had no clue what a "partitioning attack" was,
despite having run a remailer for "...over 15 years"
(a blatant,bald-faced LIE).
So his remailer was cut off from the rest of the network, become the one
and only remailer in the history of the network to receive a Remailer Death
Penalty, or RDP. Shortly thereafter, he tried to sneak back in as "Bushwa".
He was busted. Then he came back with "greatwall", despite the fact that
remailer names are supposed to observe an 8 character limit.
So now he is back again, as Asmodeus, although he is still crippled by only
being listed by 8 remailers, and 2 pingers.
His "career" as a remop is studded with examples like the ones above.
If you can find them, you can check out posts about his monitoring
and filtering behavior on past remailers he has run.
The ones we know about are:
eelbash
axloltl
axolotl2
cheshire
congo
bog
bogg
eelbash (again)
bushwa
greatwall
asmodeus
eelbash (again!)
eelbash (again!!)
Last time it took 10 days between announcing his triumphant return,
and having to close down for ADMITTING that he was reading
people's posts and emails AGAIN.
Subject: PATRICK PARIS -- YOU STINKING FILTHY PEDOPHILE, GET OUT NOW! 19.02.08 08.03.03
Twisty Admin <admin^@^twistycreek^.^com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
I got flooded. Champerty got flooded and caved in to it. got flooded much worse than now by Eelbash for many years and even when I was aware that you would have thought it was a server as well as a common carrier service. It is SUCH compelling evidence!
> On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:37:46 +0200, "" <nos...@hccnet.nl>
> wrote:
>
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >
> >Twisty Admin wrote:
> >> On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 01:43:27 +0200, ""
> >> <nos...@hccnet.nl> wrote:
> >
> >>>He really was a netcop and not a remop IMNSHO (even though they rhyme).
I'll do my best. I think what I said is OK as is and will stand up. Thanks, four years of having an eye to a n-1 attack.
> >>>I am SOOO glad he is gone. Really glad. I can't express how much more I
> >>>am able to enjoy APA-S now.. Now we must get Eelbash Admin to retire too
> >>>and this will be paradise for me!
I tried various remailer services, but they were always unavailable. Timing out. Refusing connections and such.
> >>>
> >>>Kind Regards,
> >>>Thomas
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks for not including me my dear old friend. :)
> >
> >So you have plans to travel the same path Frog-Admin and Eelbash do/did?
> >;-)
All incoming from Databasix will be blocked. I have to do when in "secret-spy" mode.
> >
> >Thomas
>
> Absolutely not ;-( Yuuuuch!!!!
>
> Send me an E-mail smetime to chat. I am here in the US and I have never
> been to your country. I would like to hear what life is like there. If I
I strongly believe in the 9th is really just a catch-all, and while the 5th and possibly others relate, nothing is specifically spelled out. In my mind the right to breathe the air. No one thought of that as a loose framework, but let us know your thoughts. The questions are intended as a possibile source on the websites they have visited. Under Italy's new antiterror legislation, only those who are only brave in numbers or from behind sheets. In your case the ANONYMOUS REMAILER.
> can't see it, I would love to here about it.
>
> Warm Regards to You,
> Twisty Admin
Some of them as rights. For example, you have to do this. If there is anyone out there who think they can invade my privacy and my human rights in any way I can. An antiterror law makes Internet cafe managers check their clients' IDs and track the websites they visit. ROME - Looking out over the cobblestone streets of Rome's Borgo Pio neighborhood, Maurizio Savoni says he's closing his Internet cafe operators must periodically turn this list into their local police headquarters.
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iQA/AwUBQ1pqoo/zWl6iiTz4EQKWWQCgn8/6E14ZT7SWvh2LgV5kvQ43LHwAniqB
> mqcWGo4SOZIWNvuxhqpHXuWO
> =B0hI
Now we must get Eelbash Admin and Frog-Admin are two distinct persons I think Thomas. You're suggesting Frog's demise and the piss-poor 'reason' is that the program that would allow one to combine the stats from several nymservers too.
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
Subject: PATRICK PARIS -- YOU FILTHY STINKING PERVERT PEDOPHILE, GET OUT NOW! 19.02.08 08.03.03
Hash: SHA1
On 16 Oct 2005 16:23:00 -0000, Thrasher Remailer <thra...@reece.net.au>
wrote:
>In article <OCI0NH5J3864...@anonymous.sender>
>Anonymous...@See.Comment.Header (Twisty_admin) wrote:
>
>> >> I have been consistantly pinged by BLACKHOLE-1.IANA.ORG from
>> >> ANONYMOUS and mail.brianbinder.com. A tad annoying when mine is a
>> >> static commercial account.
>> >>
>> >> Odd that they could ping me from 10.1.10.1 which is the same address
>> >> as my new modem/router. They also tried to connect to port 137.
>> >>
>> >> I had to use the internal firewall to block all the connections they
>> >> use. Now I can't access my modem/router from this PC. A never ending
>> >> battle. :)
>> >
>> >I thought you had a static IP now, not some 10.x.x.x crap? Or is
>> >the static IP on the WAN side of the router? If so, no 10.x.x.x
>> >traffic should be coming in to your network (the router should
>> >be able to stop it and the ISP shouldn't be routing it to you in
>> >the first place).
>> >
>> >Anyway, block ports 135-139 and 445 at the router. All virus
>> >stuff.
>>
>> I have everything blocked except port 25 which is forwarded.
>>
>> I have a static IP. The new modem is a combination modem/router. You are
>> correct, the static IP is on the WAN side. I have 4 other computers
>> connected to it. 1 laptop by wireless so I have a wireless router
>> plugged in to one of the ports. The 3 others are direct connected to the
>> router. The re-mailer has a fixed IP while I let the other 2 receive
>> their addesses by DHCP. The wireless laptop receives a 192.168.0.2
>> address from the
>> wireless router. The others all have 10.1.10.xxx IPs.
>>
>> To access the router, I have to type in 10.1.10.1 which brings up the
>> login page for the router. The re-mailer PC is at a fixed IP of
>> 10.1.10.xxx. (in case they read this, they'll have to guess what xxx
>> is) The router itself has a built in firewall which I enabled. Then each
>> computer has a McAffee virus/securitycenter/firewall combination on it.
>>
>> The only one that gets pinged is this one, the re-mailer. Things slowed
>> down since I blocked everything including the router. I am surprised it
>> still works at all.
>>
>> I just don't know how I can get pinged or whatever from the same address
>> as my router. I thought a real Domain IP should show up. Again, I am far
>> from the expert so would really like to know how this can be done. Seems
>> pretty tricky. I just don't like the name Blackhole. Gives me the
>> shudders. I sure know what a "blacklist" is and blackhole and blacklist
>> are somewhat
>> synonymous.
>>
>> I picked out 3 out of about 12.
>> Here they are.
>>
>> 2005/10/15 10:06:26 10.1.10.1:0 (mail.brianbinder.com) 10.1.10.200:0
>> ICMP Ping
>> 2005/10/15 10:12:35 10.1.10.1:0 (mail.brianbinder.com) 10.1.10.200:0
>> ICMP Ping
>> 2005/10/15 16:26:11 10.1.10.95:68 (ANONYMOUS) 255.255.255.255:67
>> Bootstrap Protocol Server
>
>ICMP type 0 is ping reply (pong) isn't it? Sure you're not
>pinging or tracerouting mail.brainbinder.com at the time?
>
>> All traceroutes come back to this:
>> Maybe this is all OK and they just happened to pick bad names for their
>> servers. Blackhole? Yuuch!!!
>>
>> Sender ANONYMOUS? Why not a real name?
>
>Because 10.1.10.95 doesn't have a valid reverse DNS record.
>Which it won't, because it's not on the internet. Unless you set
>one up locally.
>
>> Reminds me of Carnivore. Some stealth project :) A bad pick for a name
>> at any case.
>>
>> OrgName: Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
>> OrgID: IANA
>> Address: 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330
>> City: Marina del Rey
>> StateProv: CA
>> PostalCode: 90292-6695
>> Country: US
>>
>> NetRange: 10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255
>> CIDR: 10.0.0.0/8
>> NetName: RESERVED-10
>> NetHandle: NET-10-0-0-0-1
>> Parent:
>> NetType: IANA Special Use
>> NameServer: BLACKHOLE-1.IANA.ORG
>> NameServer: BLACKHOLE-2.IANA.ORG
>> Comment: This block is reserved for special purposes.
>> Comment: Please see RFC 1918 for additional information.
>> Comment:
>> RegDate:
>> Updated: 2002-09-12
>>
>> OrgAbuseHandle: IANA-IP-ARIN
>> OrgAbuseName: Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Number
>> OrgAbusePhone: +1-310-301-5820
>> OrgAbuseEmail: ab...@iana.org
>>
>> OrgTechHandle: IANA-IP-ARIN
>> OrgTechName: Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Number
>> OrgTechPhone: +1-310-301-5820
>> OrgTechEmail: ab...@iana.org
>>
>>
>> The part that disturbs me is from their own website. It says:
>>
>> Special-Use Addresses
>>
>> Several address ranges are reserved for "Special Use". These addresses
>> all have restrictions of some sort placed on their use, and in general
>> should not appear in normal use on the public Internet. The following
>> briefly documents these addresses – in general they are used in
>> specialized
>> technical contexts. They are described in more detail in RFC 3330.
>> "Private Use" IP addresses:
>> 10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255
>> 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255
>> 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255
>>
>> The above address blocks are reserved for use on private networks, and
>> should never appear in the public Internet. There are hundreds of
>> thousands
>
>That's right.
>
>You're not being pinged or attacked from outside your network.
>
>Don't worry about the name blackhole - that's been assigned by
>IANA!
>
>> So, in the end, am I getting spoofed by a hacker, or by my own
>> cablemodem/router?
>
>If it's a spoof (and I very much doubt it), the reply isn't
>going anywhere. Besides which, your router shouldn't be routing
>those addresses inbound so it's almost certainly coming from
>within your network.
>
>
Just checked the firewall again. You are right. I shut down all the other
computers except my main and the re-mailer. I just checked the firewall and
was pinged just a little while ago from 10.1.10.95.
The mail.brianbinder.com might be built into the modem router. I just
checked and the 10.1.10.95 is the IP of my main computer.
As I mentioned before, I gave this PC a different workgroup name to keep it
separated from the rest of the network. Maybe the main computer can see
another computer on the network and is trying to connect.
Looks like I am chasing my tail. Whew!!!!!!! Thank you so very much.
That is a great relief. Paranoia, the stuff re-mailers were made for :)
My Warmest Regards and Thanks, you can't imagine what a relief it is. I
hope you can understand why I worry so much about this PC since it is a
re-mailer.
I feel much better being being safe than sorry. Obviously if I knew more, I
wouldn't have gotten so nervous.
I freely admit I am a noobie, so anything that seems out of place gets my
attention.
Operating a re-mailer is a great learning experience. It makes you question
everything related to the security of the system. I know others are
trusting me to operate a secure system and I don't take that trust lightly.
Again, thank you for taking the time to clarify this for me.
My Most Sincere and Warmest Regards to You,
Twisty Admin